- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, Administrator
Awww! And you still took the time to came over and ask for help that will benefit him. That is so sweet.unhappy betrayed woman and a mother
What does Jabi mean?Docterror wrote:Awww! And you still took the time to came over and ask for help that will benefit him. That is so sweet.unhappy betrayed woman and a mother
Too bad I am not buying any of this!
Getting to the legal matter in hand, the next step for your husband is not ILR but further extension for the EEA2. He needs a total of 5 years on the EEA2 before he gets the ILR... and, he is not given a spouse visa, but a Residence Card/Permit.
Friends tend to call me so. It's an acronym for Just Another Brilliant Individual. I am very humble. I could not make it my user-id as someone else had taken it up before me.SYH wrote:What does Jabi mean?
Stop looking in the mirror so that reading words sounding similar will not remind you of what you had just seen!Makes me think of Jabba the hut
Actually it is a little too good to be true from my world of reality too.tinux wrote:why not??????? not everyone is as bad as you think. You sounds like a police man :DDocterror wrote: Too bad I am not buying any of this!
.
Don't get me wrong. I have no objections to anybody playing you for a fool. It is just I who refused to believe that somebody is that 'naive'.tinux wrote: why not??????? not everyone is as bad as you think. You sounds like a police man
Shame on anyone that would try to shame you, those that would call you dirty only dirty their own mouths and minds.I been though the shame to represent myself, as a dirty a ... what ever you name it, girl,
Actually, it doesn't make legal sense either.Docterror wrote: Yes, Naive is the word. Here is someone with a story that says that they married in 2004 and had a child in 2005, in just an year and yet the father refused to be named on the Birth certificate. She accepted that! (My line of thought... may be not his child.. atleast according to him)
So, let me get this right. Since they are not divorced yet in the eyes of the law, the marriage is still subsisting and the OP does not need the 'enstranged' husband's consent to register the birth of the child and put 'Him' on the baby's BC as the father (come on Amanda!)?avjones wrote:Actually, it doesn't make legal sense either.Docterror wrote: Yes, Naive is the word. Here is someone with a story that says that they married in 2004 and had a child in 2005, in just an year and yet the father refused to be named on the Birth certificate. She accepted that! (My line of thought... may be not his child.. atleast according to him)
If the parents are married, either parent can register the birth and put BOTH parents' names down. The husband of a married woman is presumed to be the father of the baby.
If the parents are unmarried, the father can't register the birth alone. The mother can register it alone, but the father must attend to have his details put on the birth certificate.
For example, my parents were married before they had children. My mother, alone, registered my birth, and my father, alone, registered my sisters' and brother's births. I am not married, so both of us had to register our son's birth.
This is all true only if the birth took place in the UK. But from what I can decipher from the cryptic message, there is a chance that the birth took place in an other country.If the parents are married, either parent can register the birth and put BOTH parents' names down. The husband of a married woman is presumed to be the father of the baby.