apache1 wrote:I send a cover letter addressed to the home secretary summarizing all what in the application but I haven't actually said I was applying for a DLR. In the response I had. It said " on ... the appellant completed a FLR(0) application form for applying to further leave to remain as domestic worker in a private... the application was refused on ... on the basis that the appellant had not entered the UK with entry clearance as a domestic worker...therefore
What's maddening me right now, is the judge recognized that I made a mistake but still they carried on and build the whole case on that error!
I wouldn't be surprised if the office did this but I expected, at least, a judge to be fair.
The reason I asked the question was, if you have any thing in your initial application pack which could prove that you applied for some thing different from that domestic worker category and then we could use this to prove that ticking the wrong box was indeed a mistake and judge has made an error to point out this mistake while it was evident. This might be a way to fight in UT.
Further, I asked a simple question to Obie that if we are fighting against refusal of application then its difficult to fight without having some evidence which could prove that it was a mistake and not an intention. However, there HO did not question your eligibility (if there would be no such mistake) for DLR
The judge's statement
"it's evident that he has indeed applied to further leave to remain as domestic worker..."
is a fact and could be argued if we have some evidence saying otherwise and included with original application.
These are my thoughts to prepare you for UT.
I wish you Good luck.
Regards,
