- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, Administrator
ThanksObie wrote:Well the Lawyer is in some way right and in some way not right.
You are under the 10 years route, if he felt Edgehill was engaged in your case and you should have been issues under the Old rules, they he ought to have written to them about that.
He cannot simply proceed on that basis and live you on a short fall of several months , when he has not brought this to their attention .
I have given you the answer and the caselaw.oamalik wrote:Guess no one has the answer to my question.Any way to update the thread i consulted one of my work collegues who also has an immigration law firm as well.He said that I will need to write to home office about the situation.They may or may not accept this as it is too late.Then I will need to file for judicial review where it could get accepted.They would have accepted if I did write them in time during my first FLR period of 2.5 years.He also said there has been a ruling that cases which fall under that specific period of old rules will have the same old rules applied to them.Any one has info regarding that?
Spoke to my solicitor again and he has the same answer that I should need not worry as I can apply for ILR after this second FLR period of 2.5 years.Any way in both situation all is not doom n gloom.May be another advice i will get from another reputable solicitor.
Any way lates news is as follows
Application Date : 8/8/15
Fee Deducted : 10/8/15
Biometric Letter & Acknowledgement : 19/8/15
Biometric Done : 26/8/15
Decesion : 16/10/15 Granted
BRP : 23/10/15
Thanks for your response.Its quite confusing really with different opinions with different people.My collegue said that the cases that were sent to the home office on 8 July 2012 also had decesions with new rules but they were later rectified under old rules when questioned the home office.so the answer i got from my solictior and my collegues are also right in some way or not?i am just asking your opinion?Obie wrote:I have given you the answer and the caselaw.oamalik wrote:Guess no one has the answer to my question.Any way to update the thread i consulted one of my work collegues who also has an immigration law firm as well.He said that I will need to write to home office about the situation.They may or may not accept this as it is too late.Then I will need to file for judicial review where it could get accepted.They would have accepted if I did write them in time during my first FLR period of 2.5 years.He also said there has been a ruling that cases which fall under that specific period of old rules will have the same old rules applied to them.Any one has info regarding that?
Spoke to my solicitor again and he has the same answer that I should need not worry as I can apply for ILR after this second FLR period of 2.5 years.Any way in both situation all is not doom n gloom.May be another advice i will get from another reputable solicitor.
Any way lates news is as follows
Application Date : 8/8/15
Fee Deducted : 10/8/15
Biometric Letter & Acknowledgement : 19/8/15
Biometric Done : 26/8/15
Decesion : 16/10/15 Granted
BRP : 23/10/15
just that you wanted a second opinion , which you are entitled to..
Thank you.Yes I have the same opinion.I will consult some other firm regarding that.Before I was waiting for the application outcome.Now that sorted I will have to work this out too.Thanks for your helpObie wrote:Well your solicitor has acted in an incompetent manner. He ought to have informed them of the legal position when last application was made.
Its odd, that he is proposing to notify them in 2018.
Yes but its beter than waiting 7.5 yearsObie wrote:It is a bit late on the Day and Home office may seek to resist it.
I will have to fight another few years for that i guess loloamalik wrote:Yes but its beter than waiting 7.5 yearsObie wrote:It is a bit late on the Day and Home office may seek to resist it.
Further updateObie wrote:Very well so. I accept.
But the courts will have difficulty accepting this, without more, when you failed to challenge it all this whiles.
In law and judicial proceedings, timing is of utmost importance.