can anyone please help me
sorry about a long post.x
permission to appeal is granted
reasons for decision{including any decision on extending time}
1, the appellants seed permission to appeal against the determination of first-tier tribunal jude andonian promulgated on 18/08/2014 whereby the appellants"appeals against the decisions of an entry clearance office to refuse their applications for permission to enter the united kingdom for the purposes of settlement were dismissed.
2,within the grounds of application the appellants"legal representatives laid great emphasis on the claim that the judge has made an arguable error of law in considering the issue of"sole responsibility" by reference to paragraph 301(i)(b) of the immigration rules, which requires that the appellants"sponsor in the united kingdom (their mother) has had sole responsibility for them.
3,the judge correctly considered the facts of the case as known to him but fond the the appellants" grandmother, with whom they
had been living for the past nine years was in fact sharing responsibility with her daughter (the appellants"mother) and thus, it could not be said that the appellants" mother had sole responsibility for her children.
4,Iam satisfied that it is arguable that the judge did not give sufficient weight to the case of TD (sole responsibility) YEMEN (2006
) ukait 0049 IN WHICH IT IS ACCEPTED THAT AN ABSENT PARENT MAY STILL BE EXERCISING SOLE RESPONSIBILITY FOR A CHILD OR Children despite the fact that the child or children remain with parents or other relatives.
5,the judge appeared to consider that because the appellants" grandmother saw to all their day-to-day necessities including matters relating their health, education and welfare generally without referring every single decision back to there mother,meant that the mother was not exercising sole responsibility within the meaning of the immigration rules.
6, I find that finding may arguable constitute an error of law and as a consequence permission to appeal is granted....
what are my chance at upper tribunal oral hearing?
