ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

New Judgement

General UK immigration & work permits; don't post job search or family related topics!

Please use this section of the board if there is no specific section for your query.

Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, Administrator

Locked
Shondra Sharma
Senior Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:13 am

New Judgement

Post by Shondra Sharma » Fri Oct 31, 2014 12:49 am


Shondra Sharma
Senior Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:13 am

Re: New Judgement

Post by Shondra Sharma » Fri Oct 31, 2014 7:25 pm

What you make of it this judgement? Any hope in future? Please can someone comment? @amber, @vinny

maj-server
Newly Registered
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2014 4:48 pm

Re: New Judgement

Post by maj-server » Sat Nov 08, 2014 5:43 pm

well, the applicant applied to the Secretary of State only for definite leave to remain, and made no request for indefinite leave to remain, I believe he should have applied for ILR in the 1st place.

Shondra Sharma
Senior Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:13 am

Re: New Judgement

Post by Shondra Sharma » Sat Nov 08, 2014 6:49 pm

There is no provision to apply ILR in the first place. In my case me and my partner both overstayer got a 30 month leave to remain because our child is british(child born and brought up in uk for 10 years category).

vinny
Moderator
Posts: 32785
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2007 7:58 pm

Re: New Judgement

Post by vinny » Sun Nov 09, 2014 6:29 am

This is not intended to be legal or professional advice in any jurisdiction. Please click on any given links for further information. Refer to the source of any quotes.
We do not inherit the Earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children.

Shondra Sharma
Senior Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:13 am

Re: New Judgement

Post by Shondra Sharma » Sun Nov 09, 2014 9:57 am

But in 2.5 leave to remain, not allow to take public fund, even british child can't able to take child benefit. 3 year DLR is look like a mini ILR, able access every public funds, that's why its not a problem.

Shondra Sharma
Senior Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:13 am

Re: New Judgement

Post by Shondra Sharma » Mon Nov 10, 2014 10:12 am

On this judgement court decides restrict the lenght of stay is unlawful but court didn't say its should be a law 7 years child application people can get ILR instead of 2.5 year leave to remain. Court says depending on the individual circumsatnces, they might get ILR, like length of long residence in uk, child spent whole their life in uk etc. How could we fight for this?

Shondra Sharma
Senior Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:13 am

Re: New Judgement

Post by Shondra Sharma » Tue Nov 18, 2014 10:30 am

Any comment on this please?@vinny, obie

shyahasson
Newly Registered
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2014 11:09 pm

Re: New Judgement

Post by shyahasson » Thu Nov 20, 2014 11:25 pm

HI,
I need your help please.

I am a british citizen and working abroad. My wife is not a british citizen and I have two british citizen daughters from my wife. she has a multi family visiting visa for five years. this year my old daughter is in the school in the uk and staying with her mom and her new born sister. all of them are living with my dad. my question is that can My wife apply to stay with her dependent daughters as she is the only one the in the uk responsibly for them for upbringing. if not can she apply for an extension at least to stay with my daughter while she finish her school.

Kind regards,

shyahasson

lucky007
Newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2014 1:41 pm

Re: New Judgement

Post by lucky007 » Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:24 am

Shondra Sharma wrote:Any comment on this please?@vinny, obie

Hey Shondra,

I met the barrister last week. who had been in court of appeal on behalf of client. I had asked him all questions related to court of appeal judgement.

1. appeals were dismissed because all parties were not applied for ILR

2. its also depend on ur first application if you applied for ILR that's fine if not than u r not in position to claim ILR.

3. one of appellant wrote letters to HO after applied DL and demand for ILR but court of appeal said in his judgement he didn't use appropriate form ILR and pay fee for ILR.

4. but court of appeal mentioned in his judgement this policy is unlawful in which HO give 2.5 yrs or 3yrs DL.

5. he said may be HO will go to supreme court or change the policy wait two or three weeks more.

Shondra Sharma
Senior Member
Posts: 641
Joined: Mon Jul 01, 2013 8:13 am

Re: New Judgement

Post by Shondra Sharma » Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:53 pm

Hi@lucky007 thanks for your kind information. First place I didn't apply for ILR, because I am looking some sort of stay first, obviously being an overstayer for a long time, its tough life. What happened if HO office didn't go to court or lost in supreme court again? Whoever applied ILR in the first place like this category, can HO only grant ILR for them only? What about the other people like me got a 2.5 year leave to remain on 10 year route settlement? Please update this news on coming days. God bless.

Locked
cron