ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, Administrator
Hi,sagareva wrote:yes, but there is admin review -- a slightly dubious process in w2hich home office reviews itself
in practice though, this is not necessarily bad. in over 90% t1g cases it is possible to file them in a way where it will be 100% approvable and defensible under the rules. those get refused sometimes due to lower level caseworker ignorance, a person either being mistaken, or not understanding or overlooking something. there is no point to litigating this -- AR provides a venue to return this to HO and it will then be looked at by more sophisticated employees. this could become an effective stage at which most mistakes are resolved.
if you really do have a crucial question of law to litigate there may still be a JR option, so if the case has an inherent weakness you cannot avoid you have to plan on how to present it. everyone should also look at making a subtle human rights claim with every application where that is practicable.
sagareva wrote:yes, but there is admin review -- a slightly dubious process in w2hich home office reviews itself
in practice though, this is not necessarily bad. in over 90% t1g cases it is possible to file them in a way where it will be 100% approvable and defensible under the rules. those get refused sometimes due to lower level caseworker ignorance, a person either being mistaken, or not understanding or overlooking something. there is no point to litigating this -- AR provides a venue to return this to HO and it will then be looked at by more sophisticated employees. this could become an effective stage at which most mistakes are resolved.
if you really do have a crucial question of law to litigate there may still be a JR option, so if the case has an inherent weakness you cannot avoid you have to plan on how to present it. everyone should also look at making a subtle human rights claim with every application where that is practicable.
adnaankhan1 wrote:sagareva wrote:yes, but there is admin review -- a slightly dubious process in w2hich home office reviews itself
Many thanks for reply, it feels a bit peace , any idea how long it could take for admin review to receive the full response etc , so if that could be declined again, I could apply for 10 years route , gap is 4-5 months bw 5 years and 10yrs route
adnaankhan1 wrote:Wondering if someone could help,
My tier 1 general dependant been away from UK for 6 months continually in total 5 years period, will this gap be make any problem , as a main applicant there's a limit to stay out of country
Thanks
sagareva wrote:yes, but there is admin review -- a slightly dubious process in w2hich home office reviews itself
in practice though, this is not necessarily bad. in over 90% t1g cases it is possible to file them in a way where it will be 100% approvable and defensible under the rules. those get refused sometimes due to lower level caseworker ignorance, a person either being mistaken, or not understanding or overlooking something. there is no point to litigating this -- AR provides a venue to return this to HO and it will then be looked at by more sophisticated employees. this could become an effective stage at which most mistakes are resolved.
if you really do have a crucial question of law to litigate there may still be a JR option, so if the case has an inherent weakness you cannot avoid you have to plan on how to present it. everyone should also look at making a subtle human rights claim with every application where that is practicable.