sah10406 wrote:
I maintain that OP's situation is dicey and not clean-cut, although happy to have been corrected about some of my concerns.
Why dicey?
I am of the view that there is a decent prospect of success, at present if her husband is earning 18600, she passes her English language test, after birth the chances are even much greater, if she has not committed a criminal offense.
I may be inclined to say, that the SSHD my have insurmountable in removing her, if her history, is as she has presented.
I respect your view sah10406, it may be at variance with mine, that is clearly part of a healthy debate. There is no reason to be offensive towards other, if you don't like their view, or threatening them that they will be jailed, when they are not in violation of section 84 in no way.
I believe you stand to learn a lot through humility that looking down your nose at people.
I joined this forum several years back as a student, and you can be rest assured that i have gained enormously more experience here than I have at the lecture theatre . I have even learned a lot from people Like Casa and Wanderer ( Even though we don't see eye to eye on many things).
You have to drop this attitude . There is no reason for a decent profession to conduct themselves in this way.