- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
The Surinder Singh route can now also be used by the extended family members including unmarried partners in a durable relationship. This became possible following a court judgement towards the end of 2014.SonOfConstantine wrote:Hello everyone - this is my first post, so please excuse me if this topic has already been covered elsewhere. I am a UK citizen, and my girlfriend of 5 years is a US citizen. She has been, until recently, working under a tier 2 work visa, but that employment has now ended. We were planning on applying for the UK partnership visa, but I don't meet the income requirements unfortunately. My question is, does the Surinder Singh route (using Ireland for the sake of argument) recognise long term partners, or is legal marriage necessary? And if it is the latter, would the Home Office in the UK block any application made by me and her to get married in the UK now that her work visa has ended? I know that marriage wouldn't make much/any difference to a UK partnership visa given the strict financial requirements, but if it would help in Ireland we might consider it.
Thanks for your help!
Casa i wish it was as simple as that. In the Case of Capello , which I believe you are referring to, the Home Office has appealed the decision. Permission was refused by the Upper Tribunal, and I believe it was sought at the Court of Appeal. We will see whether the Court of Appeal grants or not.The Surinder Singh route can now also be used by the extended family members including unmarried partners in a durable relationship. This became possible following a court judgement towards the end of 2014.
Have you been living together and if so, for how long?
The problem with marrying in the UK if your girlfriend no longer has a valid visa, is that you would have to register your intent to marry with a Home Office designated Registry Office. The Registrar is then legally bound to notify the Home Office who can then extend the notification period from 20 to 70 days. This will enable them to interview you both if they choose, before the wedding can take place. If your girlfriend has no legal status here, they could remove her from the UK before you are able to marry...although in any event, marriage will not give her legal residency.
Obie, I know that you have been fairly positive in the past about an EEA unmarried partner application with less than 2 years co-habitation being accepted as a 'durable' relationship. Are you now more cautious and if so, how do you view the OP's situation here? As you know, I'm generally reluctant give false hope.Casa wrote:Obie wrote:Casa i wish it was as simple as that. In the Case of Capello , which I believe you are referring to, the Home Office has appealed the decision. Permission was refused by the Upper Tribunal, and I believe it was sought at the Court of Appeal. We will see whether the Court of Appeal grants or not.Casa wrote: The Surinder Singh route can now also be used by the extended family members including unmarried partners in a durable relationship. This became possible following a court judgement towards the end of 2014.
Have you been living together and if so, for how long?
The problem with marrying in the UK if your girlfriend no longer has a valid visa, is that you would have to register your intent to marry with a Home Office designated Registry Office. The Registrar is then legally bound to notify the Home Office who can then extend the notification period from 20 to 70 days. This will enable them to interview you both if they choose, before the wedding can take place. If your girlfriend has no legal status here, they could remove her from the UK before you are able to marry...although in any event, marriage will not give her legal residency.
The Home Office refuses to accept the rationale of the judgement.
But a recent tribunal may help , but that too is too cumbersome to make much sense of, although it found that not meeting the requirement of Regulation 9 is not the end of a matter.
So unfortunately the Home office has still not changed its policy following that judgement.