Post
by avjones » Sun Nov 29, 2015 10:15 am
Sorry, I'm a barrister, not actually bringing my own case.
If it's the first hearing at the Upper Tribunal, it's an "error of law" hearing. That means the Home Office will be saying that the First Tier Tribunal Judge erred in law in his determination.
If there isn't an error of law, that's it. If there is, the decision must be re-made. There may or may not be a further hearing to re-make it.
I am not, and cannot, offer legal advice to particular people. I can only discuss general areas of immigration law.
People should always consider obtaining professional advice about their own particular circumstances.