Zambrano - UKBA announces its interpretation...

Right... Zambrano no accessing benefits (not resident for Income Support / JSA / ETC)

Shouldnt the case law of Shah v Barnet LBC in 1983, which the guidance paraphrases as someone:-
living lawfully in the United Kingdom voluntarily and for settled purposes as part of the regular order of their life for the time being, whether they have an identifiable purpose for their residence here and whether that purpose has a sufficient degree of continuity to be properly described as “settled”.

have the Zambrano cases which are currently ongoing sited this case law yet?

http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitec ... iew=Binary

-----

and this was a divorce case, but focused on Habitually Residency (the husband argued the UK could not handle the case as the wife was not habitually resident in the uk) - this case does site ALOT of HR case law though....
http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed907
Marinos v Marinos [2007] EWHC 2047 (Fam)

New Zambrano case: Good news and bad news for Zambrano carers.

EU derived rights of residence not automatically lost if crime is committed

CS v UK C-304/14

Marin v Spain C-165/14

vinny wrote:EU derived rights of residence not automatically lost if crime is committed

Until Brexit.