- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
lets see how our decisions will go i hope shah05 they also didnt got the permission to got UTShah05 wrote:Indeed it is a good news. Let's hope for the best.
Hi sad.1 & everyone else!sad.1 wrote:Aodendal.....can you please share with us your refusal points and you already know that you are not eligible to work after the visa meanwhile you have not received it from HO you carry on and all you can do is to give your employer your solicitor letter stating that your visa appeal was approved and now you are waiting for visa hope this can help. Really happy that HO can turn down by FTT.
Thank you.sad.1 wrote:wow you have gone thru from such a hard time but dont worry Allah all the mighty is always there to help his creatures. you can work just present your documents to them that you won the appeal and then you can carry on working really happy to hear that so i hope you will get your visa soon and all of us get some relief as this is really pianful you waiting from 2013 i am waiting since august 2012.....but still going thru with patience and prayer. thanks
Yes keep us up to date - my timeline and reasons is very similar to yours - but the judge ruled the HO representative could not prove any facts why my visa was refused in the first place - the judge stated that the grounds they used " revealed no arguable material error of law"KingNothing wrote:Dear All,
Good news for all of us. In my case FTT has REFUSED the HO application to challenge the decision to UTT. However they have told them they may appeal directly from UTT only if a Point of Law arising from FTT is observed.
Decision:
The grounds contend the judge erred in misconstructing the Immigration Rules and in incorrectly applying the "Evidential Flexibility" policy.
The Judge allowed the appeal to limited extent only. The judge's reasoning is carefully set out in a detailed and thorough determination. The various claimed defects in the application were all found to fall within the terms of the policy or under paragraph 245AA. The judge's conclusions were open to him. The grounds do not identify an arguable error of law.
Permission is REFUSED.
So My appeal was allowed and then HO Challenged and now their challenge request is Refused. Do you have any idea what might happen now?
Will HO usually carry on and ask UTT Directly? I also read somewhere about exhausting the court if I am right. Can anyone advise?
I wish you all good luck and hope you get good news as well...
Hearing Date: 28/12/2013
Decision Date: 06/02/2014
HO Challenge Request: 17/02/2014
HO Challenge Refusal: 04/03/2014
KingNothing wrote:Dear All,
Good news for all of us. In my case FTT has REFUSED the HO application to challenge the decision to UTT. However they have told them they may appeal directly from UTT only if a Point of Law arising from FTT is observed.
Decision:
The grounds contend the judge erred in misconstructing the Immigration Rules and in incorrectly applying the "Evidential Flexibility" policy.
The Judge allowed the appeal to limited extent only. The judge's reasoning is carefully set out in a detailed and thorough determination. The various claimed defects in the application were all found to fall within the terms of the policy or under paragraph 245AA. The judge's conclusions were open to him. The grounds do not identify an arguable error of law.
Permission is REFUSED.
So My appeal was allowed and then HO Challenged and now their challenge request is Refused. Do you have any idea what might happen now?
Will HO usually carry on and ask UTT Directly? I also read somewhere about exhausting the court if I am right. Can anyone advise?
I wish you all good luck and hope you get good news as well...
Hearing Date: 28/12/2013
Decision Date: 06/02/2014
HO Challenge Request: 17/02/2014
HO Challenge Refusal: 04/03/2014