PSW refusal and submitted Judicial Review..

Only for UK Tier 1 (Post-Study Work) points system

Moderators: vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, ca.funke, Amber, sushdmehta, John, ChetanOjha, batleykhan, push, JAJ, Casa, archigabe, sbrennan

Postby vishwen » Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:24 pm

dear mahe,

if you been awarded after 4th april 2012, then your case wil be the same like KHATEL CASE, but don't worry, the ukba might withdraw thier decision just one day before the hearing. Two of my friends their appeal has been withdrawn before the hearing date.

SO,, mahe you don't need to worry at all. if you need more information let me know.

thanks

vishwen
vishwen
Junior Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:02 pm

Postby vishwen » Fri Mar 08, 2013 6:29 pm

DEAR ALL,

TODAY I RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE ROYAL COURT OF JUSTICE ( HIGH COURT ), THAT MY APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW HAS BEEN PASS ON TO THE JUDGE, AND THE HEARING WILL BE DECIDED BY NEXT WEEK.

I WILL KEEP ALL OF YOU UPDATE, REGARDING THE JUDICIAL REVIEW.

THOSE WHO ARE WAITING FOR THE JUDICIAL REVIEW, NEED TO WAIT, AS I'M THE FIRST PERSON WHOSE CASE BEEN PASS TO THE JUDGE.

HOPEFULLY IT WILL BE A GOOD NEWS.
vishwen
Junior Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:02 pm

Postby wasimraza121 » Fri Mar 08, 2013 9:05 pm

Who will represent you ?

Is it going to be khatel case?
May Almighty bless you

vishwen wrote:DEAR ALL,

TODAY I RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE ROYAL COURT OF JUSTICE ( HIGH COURT ), THAT MY APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW HAS BEEN PASS ON TO THE JUDGE, AND THE HEARING WILL BE DECIDED BY NEXT WEEK.

I WILL KEEP ALL OF YOU UPDATE, REGARDING THE JUDICIAL REVIEW.

THOSE WHO ARE WAITING FOR THE JUDICIAL REVIEW, NEED TO WAIT, AS I'M THE FIRST PERSON WHOSE CASE BEEN PASS TO THE JUDGE.

HOPEFULLY IT WILL BE A GOOD NEWS.
wasimraza121
Junior Member
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:13 pm

Postby rajabrave » Sat Mar 09, 2013 12:34 pm

vishwen wrote:DEAR ALL,

TODAY I RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE ROYAL COURT OF JUSTICE ( HIGH COURT ), THAT MY APPLICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW HAS BEEN PASS ON TO THE JUDGE, AND THE HEARING WILL BE DECIDED BY NEXT WEEK.

I WILL KEEP ALL OF YOU UPDATE, REGARDING THE JUDICIAL REVIEW.

THOSE WHO ARE WAITING FOR THE JUDICIAL REVIEW, NEED TO WAIT, AS I'M THE FIRST PERSON WHOSE CASE BEEN PASS TO THE JUDGE.

HOPEFULLY IT WILL BE A GOOD NEWS.

Yes vishwen,everybody hoping u'll get good news,but my Question is to u,have they send u consent order to u earlier & is it your hearing in court of appeal???
because they sent me a Consent order on 30th jan,which i signed & send back to them on 7th Of Feb.so please reply with detail because i have also applied JR & waiting for result...Plz reply thanks
rajabrave
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:35 pm

Postby vishwen » Sat Mar 09, 2013 3:00 pm

dear rajabrave,

yes, they sent me a consent order, stated that they wanted to put my application on hold, while they seek to appeal in the court of appeal against khatel case. but my solicitor are not stupiud, and we didn't sign the consent order, instead we propose them to granted my psw, then i will withdraw my JR.
my solicitor write to the court, and let them know we are against the consen order.

i bet you make a big mistake, you should not sign the consent order.

so now, my file has been pass to the judge, hopefully i will get the permission for judicial review granted.

rajabrave, let me know if you need omre information.
vishwen
Junior Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:02 pm

Postby rajabrave » Sat Mar 09, 2013 4:54 pm

So what is the further chances for me,so what can i do further,because if they refuse again ,so is there any chance to appeal against them in court??? Plz reply me thanks
rajabrave
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:35 pm

Postby vishwen » Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:30 pm

dear rajabrave,

why at the first place did you sign the consent order. your solicitor didn't tell you, it means that you are agreed to their proposal. then i think you need to wait for khatel case to be decided in the court of appeal, and don't know how long it will takes. like me i filed my case for jr since beginnig of november 2012, and it took nearly 5 months for my file to be passed to the judge. 3 times, the treasury solicitor send me consent order to sign, but my solicitor refused everytime to sign and we will not agreed any of their proposal.
i can't say, whether your JR will be granted or not, but at the moment you have to wait, and nobody knows how long it will takes.

if you need more explanation let me know.
vishwen
Junior Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:02 pm

Postby rajabrave » Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:38 pm

vishwen wrote:dear rajabrave,

why at the first place did you sign the consent order. your solicitor didn't tell you, it means that you are agreed to their proposal. then i think you need to wait for khatel case to be decided in the court of appeal, and don't know how long it will takes. like me i filed my case for jr since beginnig of november 2012, and it took nearly 5 months for my file to be passed to the judge. 3 times, the treasury solicitor send me consent order to sign, but my solicitor refused everytime to sign and we will not agreed any of their proposal.
i can't say, whether your JR will be granted or not, but at the moment you have to wait, and nobody knows how long it will takes.

if you need more explanation let me know.


So it mean my JR still be valid but will have to wait khatel case bcx i signed?? Bcx i m confused about this...yes my solicitor ask me to sign and send them & wait for khatel case,so if you have hearing next week,cam it be make any impact on my JR??? Plz reply
& one more Question after Consent Order can anyone still have the right of appeal in high court,??? Plz explain this..I really appreciate this to give me time..Thanks
rajabrave
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:35 pm

Postby vishwen » Sat Mar 09, 2013 6:58 pm

dear rajabrave,

your application for JR still valid,but the only thing is that you are giving them time, so it means that your file will not pass to the judge, because the ho is appealing against khatel case, so untill you don't get a decision from khatel case, your JR will be pending.i don't understand the point of appealing if you sign the consent order, it has nothing to do for appealing.

rajabrave i think you are confused and it seems you don't understand how the all process work.
vishwen
Junior Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:02 pm

Postby rajabrave » Sat Mar 09, 2013 7:14 pm

vishwen wrote:dear rajabrave,

your application for JR still valid,but the only thing is that you are giving them time, so it means that your file will not pass to the judge, because the ho is appealing against khatel case, so untill you don't get a decision from khatel case, your JR will be pending.i don't understand the point of appealing if you sign the consent order, it has nothing to do for appealing.

rajabrave i think you are confused and it seems you don't understand how the all process work.

Thanks brother for explaining me,Now i m much clear,yeh i have made a mistake to give them time,Anyways hoping for the Best...& Best of luck to you Aswel..Please let us know outcome of ur Hearing..Thanks Again for helping..GOD Bless U...:)
rajabrave
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:35 pm

Postby vishwen » Sat Mar 09, 2013 9:17 pm

of course i will let u know what will happen next week, just pray that the permission for judicial review been granted.
vishwen
Junior Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:02 pm

Postby laghari_iam » Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:26 pm

any one have any clue on when HO will get a hearing date against khatel case in court of appeal? and how long does is usually take to get a hearing date in court of appeal? its already been 1 month since the permission been granted.
laghari_iam
Junior Member
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:37 pm

lil news.

Postby laghari_iam » Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:29 pm

ok now i've some news to tell ya guys i've just been told this by a frnd i dont know if this is true or not.

HO got permission to go for court of appeal but their grounds were week that's why they been refused and now they've gone for administrative review or something.

hope they get refuse again.
laghari_iam
Junior Member
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:37 pm

Re: lil news.

Postby wasimraza121 » Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:11 pm

laghari_iam wrote:ok now i've some news to tell ya guys i've just been told this by a frnd i dont know if this is true or not.

HO got permission to go for court of appeal but their grounds were week that's why they been refused and now they've gone for administrative review or something.

hope they get refuse again.



brother do not listen to rumours share only reliable information.
thanks
[/b]
wasimraza121
Junior Member
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:13 pm

Postby laghari_iam » Thu Mar 14, 2013 9:20 am

Then why they ain't got any hearing date yet? It's been a month.
laghari_iam
Junior Member
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:37 pm

Postby wasimraza121 » Thu Mar 14, 2013 3:28 pm

laghari_iam wrote:Then why they ain't got any hearing date yet? It's been a month.


No news yet. It takes 4 weeks to maximum of 10 months to get the final result of court of appeal[/b]
wasimraza121
Junior Member
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:13 pm

Postby rajabrave » Sat Mar 16, 2013 2:40 am

vishwen wrote:of course i will let u know what will happen next week, just pray that the permission for judicial review been granted.

So brother what happened to ur judicial review ...have u got permission or not?????
rajabrave
Newbie
 
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:35 pm

Postby vishwen » Sat Mar 23, 2013 4:19 pm

[b]Dear All,

I received a letter from ukba on the 18 march 2013, and they said they reconsider my application FOR THE 3rd time and this time they mentioned a different date of award in the letter and also they mentioned that the course completion date is after 4th april 2012. And this time they give me RIGHT OF APPEAL.

WHAT ON EARTH IS GOING ON ?

THE CASE IS ALREADY BEEN CHALLENGED IN THE HIGH COURT AND ITS ALMOST 5 MONTH SINCE MY JR IS PENDING,even my solicitor don't know why we received another letter from ukba after 5 months.

HOW CAN SOMEBODY APPEAL, WHEN THE CASE ALREADY IN THE HIGH COURT...... ANY SUGGESTION ??????????????????
vishwen
Junior Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:02 pm

Postby wasimraza121 » Sat Mar 23, 2013 10:58 pm

vishwen wrote:Dear All,

I received a letter from ukba on the 18 march 2013, and they said they reconsider my application FOR THE 3rd time and this time they mentioned a different date of award in the letter and also they mentioned that the course completion date is after 4th april 2012. And this time they give me RIGHT OF APPEAL.

WHAT ON EARTH IS GOING ON ?

THE CASE IS ALREADY BEEN CHALLENGED IN THE HIGH COURT AND ITS ALMOST 5 MONTH SINCE MY JR IS PENDING,even my solicitor don't know why we received another letter from ukba after 5 months.

HOW CAN SOMEBODY APPEAL, WHEN THE CASE ALREADY IN THE HIGH COURT...... ANY SUGGESTION ??????????????????


I think they are just killing time.
if you look at these points just give your opinion. what you think as a just reader abt the case.

[b]43. So everything depends on Mr Malik’s second submission. He can support that submission by seven observations:

(i) The most important is Lord Justice Pill’s decision that applications for variation including applications for variation of points based system claims for leave are continuing applications starting when the application is first lodged but remaining open until it is decided.

(ii) Both Lord Justice Sullivan and Lord Justice Pill in AQ concluded that even when there is an historic timeline in PBS cases, that historic timeline is to be decided as at the date of decision rather than the date of application.

(iii) Lord Justice Sullivan in Alam had identified the mischief to which section 85A was directed: reliance by the Tribunal on fresh evidence that was never placed before the decision maker; but in this case the material evidence was before the decision maker at the time of the decision.

(iv) There is an inconsistency of approach in the decision itself; the Secretary of State did award each claimant twenty points for the post graduate degree in the first block of Table 10 but not the 15 points for the application being within twelve months of obtaining the qualification in block 4. If the Secretary of State’s reliance on section 85A in its strictest sense was a good one then the qualification itself should have been excluded from the award of points since it was not a piece of information provided in the application when it was first made.

(v) Te Secretary of State’s submission involves reading into the words of section 85A the qualifying words ‘application first made’ rather than leaving ‘application’ to bear its natural meaning which as Lord Justice Pill has explained is a continuing one . There was no need to read into the section such a word to make sense of the statutory purpose, which was concerned with material that the Secretary of State has not had a chance to consider prior to making a decision.

(vi) It would be inconsistent with principles of statutory construction to apply a permissive meaning to the strict words in the absence of an unambiguous statement of intention by the legislation.

(vii) It was always open to the Secretary of State to make a decision on the applications shortly after the 6 April 2012 when the points based system route in question had been withdrawn. However her officials had specifically waited until the awarding bodies had made their awards and communicated with them to clarify the date of the award. There is little purpose in the Secretary of State inquiring and receiving information before the decision is made and then depriving the Tribunal from having access to that information or regard to it on the appeal.


UKBA is trying to uphold the deceision of Ali case which was in upper tribunal ignoring the Court of Appeal ref. case AQ pakistan. But the irony is they are trying to convince the court of appeal by ALI ! ! ! !
wasimraza121
Junior Member
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:13 pm

Postby vishwen » Sun Mar 24, 2013 8:28 am

dear wasimraza,

the points you mentioned are very good and clear to understand.

i think the ukba is very confused and they are trying to clear the mess,
because some students who been awarded after 4th april 2012 has got their visa, and i got eveidence of that as well.

but the question is that when they refused me last year, because of date of award, i send them PAP, then afterwards, they withdraw the original decision and said they will re-considered the case again. after one month, they send a letter and refused again, this time i went for JR, 2 weeks ago, i received a leeter from the high court that my file has been pass to the judge for permission for JR. Now, on thursday, i received a letter from ukba, saying they consider my case again, and refused again which mean for the 3rd time, and this time they give me right of appeal.So wasimraza, how will you explained this situation to me, its very confused right now.
vishwen
Junior Member
 
Posts: 86
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 5:02 pm

PreviousNext

Return to UK Tier 1 (Post-Study Work) visas

 


  • Related topics
    Views
    Replies
    Last post

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests