- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Remember you can apply 28days before the end of the qualifying period.psridh wrote:Hi,
I just completed booking an appointment for a family group. The earliest and the only appointment i could manage was
for Croydon on the 15th of June 2010. But I'm completing my 4 years period on 19th June although my HSMP visa is valid until march 2011. Is that too close. Thats like 3 days before 4 year completion period. Do you think they'll see me ?
Also on the FAQ, it says
The following people cannot be considered as part of your family group:
•Persons over the age of 18
•Other relatives making a separate application in another category
Does this mean my dependent wont be able to apply with me ?
please help, thanks
thanks for the info!!!!!!!!!!!psridh wrote:Hi,
I just completed booking an appointment for a family group. The earliest and the only appointment i could manage was for Croydon on the 15th of June 2010.
Dear Sushdmehta,sushdmehta wrote:If you selected "SET(O) excluding long residency" as type of application and included your spouse details by selecting "Add family member" (or something similar) at the time of registering, you should be fine.
With regards to Croydon PEO, I had a hard time explaining to the clerk(s) who screened my application (initial screening on the ground floor) that dependents of HSMP migrants covered by HSMP JR do not need to spend 2 years in UK as dependent to be eligible for ILR. (In my case, the dependent had entered UK 3 days before the ILR appointment). He told us that dependent's ILR would be refused if we decided to pay and get the application processed. It was obvious that he had no clue of the immigration rules and the policy guidelines issued by UKBA for those protected by HSMP JR. So, I told him that we want to get the application processed and would take our chances with the caseworker. He stamped "vaild" on the first two pages but wrote "not eligible" on the dependent details page and advised us to go upstairs (payment & processing).
When the caseworker saw our application (and the remarks by the clerk), she questioned the dependent's immigration history, went to consult with someone inside, and upon her return informed us that the dependent was indeed eligible for ILR.
Moral of the story - If the clerks tell you that your dependent isn't eligible for ILR because he/she has not spent 2 years in UK as your dependent, tell him that you would like to get the application processed and will discuss the case with the "caseworker" responsible for considering and deciding on the application.
regards
Many thanks gidoc, i'll make sure i take a copy with me, this time i'm doubling up on everything ... rest is fate or destiny. thanksgidoc wrote:Just to add, do carry a copy of the HSMP JR as even in my case, the case worker did not know about a certain rule and I had to show her a copy. She said "I have learned something new today" upon reading it.
Best regards
Dependent(s) of HSMP migrants protected by HSMP JR are covered under immigration rules 194 - 196F unlike dependents of Tier 1 migrants who are covered under immigration rules 319A - 319K. Requirements for ILR for dependents of HSMP migrants (196D) do not include any condition that the dependent must have lived in UK as a dependent to become eligible for ILR. On the other had, ILR requirements for Tier 1 dependents clearly specify such a condition (319E(d)).psridh wrote: if you could point me to where i can find the ILR guidelines to support the claim 'dependants of HSMP holder (covered under JR ruling) need not spent 2 yrs in UK'. THis is just in case if i end up in trouble.
Thanks sushdmehta,sushdmehta wrote:Dependent(s) of HSMP migrants protected by HSMP JR are covered under immigration rules 194 - 196F unlike dependents of Tier 1 migrants who are covered under immigration rules 319A - 319K. Requirements for ILR for dependents of HSMP migrants (196D) do not include any condition that the dependent must have lived in UK as a dependent to become eligible for ILR. On the other had, ILR requirements for Tier 1 dependents clearly specify such a condition (319E(d)).psridh wrote: if you could point me to where i can find the ILR guidelines to support the claim 'dependants of HSMP holder (covered under JR ruling) need not spent 2 yrs in UK'. THis is just in case if i end up in trouble.
regards
Thanks, I think I'm all set for the big day, will let you guys know how it goes, thanks againsushdmehta wrote:194-196F not only covers dependents of HSMP migrants but dependents of migrants in other economic categories (e.g.- WP). Only HSMP migrants protected by HSMP JR (and their dependents) are exempt from LITUK test at the time of ILR, by virtue of the JR judgment. Migrants in other categories (and their dependents) are required to pass LITUK test for their ILR application to be considered valid.
This said, HSMP migrants protected by HSMP JR (and their dependents) must pass LITUK test before they can apply for naturalisation.
regards
hi sushdmehta,sushdmehta wrote:194-196F not only covers dependents of HSMP migrants but dependents of migrants in other economic categories (e.g.- WP). Only HSMP migrants protected by HSMP JR (and their dependents) are exempt from LITUK test at the time of ILR, by virtue of the JR judgment. Migrants in other categories (and their dependents) are required to pass LITUK test for their ILR application to be considered valid.
This said, HSMP migrants protected by HSMP JR (and their dependents) must pass LITUK test before they can apply for naturalisation.
regards
Once your wife gets ILR, she will not be subject to any such restriction. It is only during the period of temporary residence that this restriction applies.psridh wrote:hi sushdmehta,sushdmehta wrote:194-196F not only covers dependents of HSMP migrants but dependents of migrants in other economic categories (e.g.- WP). Only HSMP migrants protected by HSMP JR (and their dependents) are exempt from LITUK test at the time of ILR, by virtue of the JR judgment. Migrants in other categories (and their dependents) are required to pass LITUK test for their ILR application to be considered valid.
This said, HSMP migrants protected by HSMP JR (and their dependents) must pass LITUK test before they can apply for naturalisation.
regards
I was wondering if you'd be able to advice me on the below?
My wife's dependant visa was stamped with the wrong endorsement as I'd feared - 'No employment as a doctor in training'. This is despite me trying to convince the home office in chennai that she's a dependant of a HSMP visa holder protected under the JR ruling of 2009.
Now i'm due to apply for my ILR including my wife in just a few weeks from now. Is there any possibility of convincing the case worker to fix the right endorsement for my wife this time ? She's been tentatively offered a training post if she can manage to get the right endorsement, any advice will be much appreciated. thanks