- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Sorry to hear that. Quite strange 4 biomteric for your dependent and all of them didn't work.Ditima98 wrote:Eeish, I am in hot soup- I put in an application (FLR) at the end of March 2015. The first biometrics batch came through around mid April. Mine and my mrs where successful-my daughter's failed. The Post Office branch where we did the scanning wrote us a note and date stamped it to pass it over to HO.
For the second, third and fourth attempt, it was the same. When I did the fourth one in the second week of this month, 4 days after the fail, I got a letter that the applications for all the 3 of us have been invalided and and our details passed on to the Law Enforcement for removal by force if I do not make arrangements to move out on my own by the end of next week. In all the four instances, I made sure I did the biometrics within the 15 days (although I should admit-just at the end of 15 days in all instances) time lapse and also always got a note from the Post Office. They have also give us an opportunity to put in a fresh application before the 28 days elapses from the date of letter invalidity.
I am seeking advise on two questions;
Should I put in a fresh application or challenge the decision by launching a Judicial review. What are the advantages and pit falls of going for either two.
I would be very grateful for any of your input. Can't sleep, I have accrued 9 years 7 months and as u can see, only few months to attain 10 years and now this........
Previous out of time application is not a problem as long as u got the visa at the end and out of time is not more than 28 daysDitima98 wrote:Thanks Zee Ali-most appreciated for your valuable feedback.
Indeed I was also shocked that even at the fourth time of asking, it failed-honestly. One surprising thing is that after the second one failed, I sensed danger and thus made numerous pleas via emails and even wrote requests to HO to allow me make an appointment for PEO but they kept sending fresh ones and saying I go and do it each time I phoned them, but they failed still.
I was too , for the idea that I submit fresh applications fast but my Lawyer is not for the idea. He says since I have had one other out of time application in the past (had an in time tier 4 refusal yrs back, appeal given, later withdraw appeal and submitted fresh application), another of an out of time application will cause headache if am luck, time comes for ILR. He says its better we fight for the decision to be over-turned because it was unlawful. He is positive we can succeed since I have got all the evidence-notes from the Post Office and the fact that we did all the scanning attempts within the 15 days time lapse.
Have just had a meeting with him today and we have agreed that if they fail to respond to the letter he has written to them to rescind their decision, we will wait until just before the lapse of 28 years to put in a fresh applications-just as the last resort. My only worry is that, am already under intense pressure from my Uni and my new Landlord to give them something pertaining my immigration status. And should my employer come asking before it is sorted, that will the end of my 20 hours a week job which has been very hardy.
Thanks
Agree with Omor4real. I believe u were the main applicant. but at the moment focus should be on to keep your stay unbroken and continuing because u r very close to complete 10 years.Omor4real wrote:if you and your Mrs were able to do yours at first and 1 dependant can't why invalidate. Did you cancel everything because 1 person scan was not working.
I know of a friend that couldn't do her bio metric at the post office, she tried 3 to 4 times as well but HO gave appointment to go to Croydon. You are probably unlucky.
Hope the review turn out well. What about making fresh application and keeping all the prove you have to support that the fault is from them and not you. Then when you make ILR you can use it to support the reason for the second out of time application.
I don't believe Section 3C(5) will be engaged in the circumstances you mentioned above.Zee ali wrote:
JR for what? They didn't give u any decision but invalid your application. In 28 days time put a new application and than vary it once u eligible for 10 years, Thats the only option i can see
@Obie I never said that. Op has no other viable option. If have, kindly guide usObie wrote:I don't believe Section 3C(5) will be engaged in the circumstances you mentioned above.Zee ali wrote:
JR for what? They didn't give u any decision but invalid your application. In 28 days time put a new application and than vary it once u eligible for 10 years, Thats the only option i can see
Frankly, I can't understand this mindset with legal shenanigans and game playing for advantage; looking for the best angle, talking of appeals, reconsiderations, JR.Ditima98 wrote:To be honest, I would be lying if I said I was not ball delaying to see the days go tantalizing which is to my adv considering my situation, but well I had wanted to take full advantage of the situation, I made sure that I played within their rules, ie, within 15 days lapse, made all the efforts by making follow ups and documenting all the correspondence between I, my Lawyer and the HO and am sure this will come hardy when time comes for ILR.
@Obie Thanks for your reply. I totally agree with u what u said u always talk about immigration law and implication of the law. But u also know exceptions happen. And its also depend on caseworker. I read 1 or 2 success stories on this board where people successfully varied out of time applications and got ILR.Obie wrote:Well I apologise if that was not what you were seeking to say.
I understood your post to indicate that OP can make another application in 28 days and vary to ILR .
Well I have 2 difficulty with that preposition .
1. There is no guarantee that this 28 day applocation will be outstanding at the time of the OP eligibility for ILR.
2. Even if it is , I believe the power to vary an application from one thing to another derives from section 3C.
If the op cease to have a section 3C rights , which appears to be the case, there will be no power to vary from one thing to another . Does it make sense to you ?
Sorry I misconstrued what you had said.
jupiter2016 wrote:Thanks a lot ditima , one more thing for how long 3c will carry on? If you got any idea let us know please , thanks in advance .