- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Business visitor. Not possible to change immigration status from within UK.ultragujar wrote:1- what visa will she get if she applies to give her plab 2 exam in uk????????????/
Possible.ultragujar wrote:2-if she enters as a student in uk as per tier 4 then can she file a new case for spouse visa from london only......is it allowed to change ur immigration status when ur on a student visa in uk by fulfilling all the requirements for spouse visa....................
hi all....batleykhan wrote:In what way would this be classed as deception. The ECO is already aware that you had got married before you got your DA.Therefore carrying out a second nikkah after obtaining a DA and reapplying would in my opinion make no difference. Also it is not an offence for the same couples under Pakistani or Islamic or law to carry out a second nikkah to the same person.would have been to get your nikah done again in Pakistan after your divorce absolute and show the ECO that you got married after the divorce absolute. This however could be regarded as deception as in fact you had done your nikah with your Pakistani wife before, so may not be a good option and i would not recommend this.
Re-registering your marriage should not be a problem as long as you pay the fees. You will obviously have to use this date as your official marriage date and not the first one
I would think that Minty second point is more likely to be deception as applying for a fiance visa, when infact teh ECO is already aware that you are married albeit not for Uk Immigartion legislations.
Interesting that the OP choose to ignore this pointavjones wrote:that's the confusing bit, then. You got ILR on the basis of the marriage, but you'd already gone through a divorce you considered valid before that. So the marriage wasn't present and subsisting, unless I've missed something.
On the face of it, looks pretty dodgy.pennylessinindia wrote:Interesting that the OP choose to ignore this pointavjones wrote:that's the confusing bit, then. You got ILR on the basis of the marriage, but you'd already gone through a divorce you considered valid before that. So the marriage wasn't present and subsisting, unless I've missed something.