ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

SET M - Waiting times

Family member & Ancestry immigration; don't post other immigration categories, please!
Marriage | Unmarried Partners | Fiancé/e | Ancestry

Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, Administrator

Locked
marty06
Newly Registered
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:39 am

Post by marty06 » Fri Dec 18, 2009 11:34 am

My wife's Set (M) visa was sent special delivery on Wednesday evening, exactly 12 weeks after the Home office receiving it. But Royal Mail have lost it. Despite it being sent via their most secure method. They won't do anything about it until 28 days later. The Home Office have told us we'll have to buy new passports, then apply all over again, including paying the fee. Unbelievable. I bought the Royal Mail compensation, so hopefully that will cover some of the costs, but the thought of going through the whole process again is a nightmare, not to mention having lost all of our supporting documentation.

marty06
Newly Registered
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:39 am

Post by marty06 » Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:38 am

My wife's visa and our passports have now arrived, three days late.

In the meantime I did some research into what would happen if the documents had all gone missing, and thought I'd post it here in case anyone else finds themselves in this situation. This is a bit long, but I hope by explaining it at length someone will be saved the headache that I went through trying to resolve this and get answers from the Border Agency!

As far as I can tell, whatever is being sent, whether visas from the Border Agecy or DVDs from Amazon, it is always the sender's responsibility to protect the item until the recipient acknowledges receipt (i.e. you sign the little machine that the postman gives you on the doorstep). The sender remains responsible for the item during its time within any mail system, such as the Royal Mail. The sender has 'contracted' with the mail delivery service to pass on the item to the recipient, and any loss during this stage needs to be resolved by the sender and the mail delivery service [incidentally, this also applies to all those Ebay sellers that say 'we take no responsibility for items lost in the post': such statements wouldn't hold up in a court of law]

Therefore, the Home Office were wrong to tell me that I would have to claim compensation from Royal Mail and repay the visa application if the documents had been lost. Legally the documents were still the Home Office's responsibility, and they contracted with Royal Mail to send them to me. If they had wanted to claim compensation from Royal Mail, that's up to them, but they must make sure that the recipient is adequately compensated for the lost documents (i.e. they would have to pay for new passports, a new visa application and anything else that you'd included and lost - including the actual Special Delivery prepaid envelope itself if you sent one!) This means that whether or not they can reclaim costs from Royal Mail, it doesn't affect their legal duty to compensate me to the full amount that I had lost. Nor technically should Royal Mail's failure to process any claim in a timely manner effect the Border Agency's willingness to compensate you for your loss. i.e. they can't wait until Royal Mail have refunded them before they refund you, although it is reasonable to suppose that the investigation into the missing item might take a month or so to process and the Border Agency do have a right to confirm that the items are really lost before compensating you for them.

The tricky thing here - and why it gets confusing - is that many visa applicants include a prepaid, self-addressed Special Delivery envelope in the original package. This gives you the sense that you are somehow responsible for the safe return of the document, and makes you believe the fact that it is up to you to deal with Royal Mail if it goes missing. This fact is compounded because Special Delivery offers compensation (up to £500 as standard) for failed deliveries. It is therefore natural to think 'I purchased the Special Delivery envelope, so it is me that will need to claim the Compensation which comes as part of the purcahse'. Indeed, the person at the Home Office enquiry office said something like this to me.

This is, in fact, not true. All you've done by sending a Special Delivery envelope for the return of the goods is paid for the postage: it would be like including a stamp, or even 30p for the price of a stamp. You've simply purchased and then passed on a pre-paid envelope to someone else to use. Sure, if they use it then it will work for your benefit (i.e. you will be able to track the item if you took a note of the tracking number), but it does not make you liable for the item until you have received it back and signed to confirm this. They will still be the sender of the item, and they will still therefore be in a contract with Royal Mail which is solely between them and Royal Mail.

This fact is supported by the fact that, when you buy your prepaid Special Delivery envelope, you can't actually purchase any additional insurance (which would extend the cover from the standard £500 to £2500) or the consequential loss insurance (which covers you for any costs that flow from the loss of items). All you can buy is the cost of the service itself. This is because it will not be you who is sending the item: these insurances can only be bought by the sender, because compensation can only be paid to the sender of the item (after all, imagine a situation where Amazon had sent you a DVD, it doesn't arrive, then you claim compensation for it from Royal Mail as well as asking for your money back from Amazon: it would be an easy way to work the system!) So when the Home Office say 'you must claim compensation from Royal Mail' , well, you can't actually claim compensation beyond the standard £500 nor could you have insured the documents yourself (and as we all know the cost of the visa alone is much more than this) because Royal Mail adheres to the principle that liability resides with the sender, not the recepient. They simply do not allow the recepient to buy insurance [again, this also applies to all those Ebay sellers who offer you 'extra insurance': this is false advertising - it is not your duty to buy 'insurance' for the item because any loss would not be down to you to bear.]

It's also confirmed by the fact that you can, if you want, opt not to send a Special Delivery envelope and just ask for the things to be returned 'Signed for'. This would mean the Border Agency pays for the postage rather than you. In this scenario you wouldn't feel responsible for claiming compensation because none is available from Royal Mail and you haven't actually purchased anything. But it can't be the case that by buying a better delivery service you become more liable than if you opted for the lower one! In fact, whatever delivery service you chose, the Border Agency remains responsible the documents. They are no more or less liable if the documents get lost using Signed For than Special. All that Special gets you, the applicant, is the ability to track the item from start to finish and a gaurenteed next day delivery. (Special also allows the Home Office to claim that £500 compensation if they wanted, plus any other insurance they may have). So all this advice equally applies if you opt for Signed For: don't let them tell you that you should have gone for Special if you wanted to insure it. To use my analogy again - a DVD that fails to turn up from Amazon is not your responsibility whether or not you opted for '3-5 days first class post' or 'Next Day Courier Delivery service'.

One third and final illustration is that, although you can guess that the item with your tracking number which has been lost is, in fact, your passports, documents and visa, you've actually got no proof of this: they may have sent you back the envelope empty or filled with fluff. You don't even know that some Border Agency employee is not in league with a Post Office employee to activate the tacking and then steal the passports. My point is: how can it be up to you to claim compensation when you don't actually have any legal proof that the thing you are trying to be compensated for has actually been lost. All you know is that the special delivery envelope you bought has entered the mail system. But maybe the envelope got sent out wrongly and they actually still have your passports in their office? Again, it's only the sender that can state categorigcally and in a court of law: I posted this envelope, containing these items, on this date and it has been lost

So here is my advice:

1. Make sure you keep the initial letter that the Border Agency send confirming they received your documents. This is your proof that they actually have them and that they therefore remain their responsibility until you have confirmed to them that they are back in your possession (which you do by signing)

2. The Home Office will not register an item as lost until 28 days after it was sent. However, Royal Mail told me they will accept a Special Delivery item as lost after 10 days.

Therefore, my suggestion to anyone that loses their documents is to wait the ten days (don't ring up the Enquiry number - they don't know anything about lost documents, they don't have the right information and they tell you they can't do anything) and then write or fax the Border Agency informing them that you believe the items they sent are lost. Make it clear in the letter that you expect them to fully compensate you for the lost items (including any additional costs incurred by you - e.g. having to travel to an embassy to get a new passport) and state that the documents remain the responsibility of the Border Agency. State that you also expect your visa application to be reinstated quickly and without you having to submit a new application. Ask them to explain the process of reissuing the visa and promise to co-operate with any documents that they do no need (they will need your new passport, for example), underlining the fact that you will expect all delivery costs for these documents (i.e. when you send them to them) to be reimbursed.

3. If there is no response, resend the letter after 28 days.

Make sure you send the letters by 'signed for' so you can prove they got them. There's no need to do Special because the letter does not have an inherent value. All you would need to do if these letters get lost is resend them and claim the cost back for failed delivery from Royal Mail.

4. When resending passports (or indeed sending them the first time), make sure you send them Special Delivery and purchase the correct level of insurance (£500 as standard - if you need more buy it and reclaim it from the Border Agency). Remember - all that I said above applies to you when you are sending documents, so make sure you are properly insured so the Royal Mail will pay you compensation if they lose your passports again!

5. If the Border Agency refuse to play ball, refuse to pay, or are slow, seek advice from a Citizen's Advice Bureau and ask a British citizen to write to their MP on your behalf.

6. If, in the end, the documents do turn up, then Royal Mail does allow the recipient of a Special Delivery item to make a claim for the failure to meet the guaranteed delivery time (but obviously not to claim the value of the contents as you now have them back). This is as long as the sender does not also make a claim, in which case priority goes to the sender. As it is unlikely the Border Agency will make a claim - and likely that you want nothing to do with the Border Agency ever again by this point! - it is easier to use this option at this stage than ask for the Home Office to reclaim it, so go ahead and put in the compensation form.

I hope all this might prove helpful to someone and if anyone else has any corrections or clarifications please go ahead and make them - as I say, this was all the product of my frantic search for information yesterday.

shanman
Newly Registered
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:04 pm

ILR SET(M) recieved

Post by shanman » Mon Dec 21, 2009 7:08 pm

Me and my wife applied for ILR SET(M) on the 8th of October, we got our response on the 10th of October confirming they have received it. Payment was taken a couple of days later.

We got our passports back today, her ILR stamped the 16th of December.

10.5 week wait, slightly shorter than the average but still, a hell of a wait!

Hope everyone else waiting gets good news soon. I know its a painful and achingly frustrating experience.

Merry Christmas.

mrs b
Newly Registered
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2008 11:40 am
Location: Manchester

Post by mrs b » Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:01 am

SET M posted 15 Sept 09
Received 17 Sept 09
Ack Letter received 22 Sept
ILR Stamped 20 Dec 09
Home delivery 05 Jan 10

To everyone who posts on these boards..... Thank u millions.. ... These timeline updates kept us sane......Ours took around 14 weeks due Christmas.

To those who are still waiting, please stay strong and keep your heads up. 8)

From Sin's wife :D ,,,,,,,,New year, New life

sodedra
Newly Registered
Posts: 28
Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:29 pm

Post by sodedra » Tue Jan 05, 2010 1:22 pm

mrs b wrote:SET M posted 15 Sept 09
Received 17 Sept 09
Ack Letter received 22 Sept
ILR Stamped 20 Dec 09
Home delivery 05 Jan 10

To everyone who posts on these boards..... Thank u millions.. ... These timeline updates kept us sane......Ours took around 14 weeks due Christmas.

To those who are still waiting, please stay strong and keep your heads up. 8)

From Sin's wife :D ,,,,,,,,New year, New life

hi i sent set m on the 12th oct
acknoledgement letter recieved
payment taken outits just waiting now
its been 12 weeks
hopfully migt get it this week,
what time did you recieve it?

Mel10
Newly Registered
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 9:58 pm
Location: London

Advice acted on

Post by Mel10 » Sun Jan 10, 2010 10:44 pm

marty06 wrote:
buzz_killington wrote:P
Anyway, I'm sorry for the post. I just feel really angry about the whole thing. I just can't understand how they can justify those sort of time frames like 14 weeks, 6 months. Given the fact that apparently it takes them around 2 hours or so to do it on the same day if you pay extra £200, how come there such a difference in processing times.

Well, we applied in November and I'm not gonna wait for 14 weeks before I go back to them. You place travel restriction on criminals but not on law abiding people. If we don't get back the paperwork before the end of December comes January I will be complaining and raising this issue with the local MP, MEP etc.
I'm right with you on this! I've written to my MP and MSP raising the issues that (a) this is a tax on marriage (b)the fee is disproportionate to the actual cost of processing straightforward visas (c) the service provided for such a high figure is lousy; no other business that you paid £820 to would expect you just to wait in the dark for six months without any sort of update or promise (d) it is unacceptable to limit freedom of movement for law abiding citizens/residents for such a long time.

I'd urge everyone else to do the same; even if you've now got your passport back, please take the time to write for the sake of ending this terrible process for others. You can find and email your MP directly from this website: www.writetothem.com
Hi Marty06,
I am still in the early stages of sending off my husbands ILR visa app (sent 3rd Dec, received confirmation 1 week later), but came across this site searching for information on the length of time it took and was pretty upset with the results... My husband wished we had paid more for fast track service after reading these comments, but £820 was a struggle enough!!
Anyway, I took your advice and emailed my local MP on 28th Dec asking for answers on why there is such a wait with no certainty on when the visa will be returned or anyway to track the progress, How they justify the costs, especially between the two services, etc.. On 7th Jan I received a letter from him, he said he had wrote to the Home office asking for answers to my questions..good so far. I was amazed he had responded so fast and done something about it already. I will post his response when I get it.

To all,
I would also urge everyone to do the same, with enough complaints to the Home office, with the backing of your MP, it may save others in the future from this torment.

marty06
Newly Registered
Posts: 9
Joined: Mon Nov 23, 2009 9:39 am

Post by marty06 » Mon Jan 18, 2010 9:44 am

Mel10 - that's great. I wrote to both my MP and MSP and have also received a similar reply, promising they will raise the matter with the Home Office. Even if nothing gets changed quickly, sometimes it is good to alert MPs to these things that they haven't previously been aware of. All the best with your application.

nini5
Newly Registered
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Oct 24, 2009 9:17 pm

granted ilr

Post by nini5 » Sun Jan 24, 2010 1:39 pm

SET M posted 16 nov 09
Received 17 nov 09
Ack Letter received 22 nov 09
ILR Stamped 21 jan 10
Home delivery 23 Jan 10
good luck to everyone

cass12
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2009 12:20 pm
Location: London

Post by cass12 » Thu Jan 28, 2010 4:38 pm

vickivic wrote:Think Positive... i was in your shoes i know the feeling i was worried because they took over 14 weeks to process my application. Wish you all the best :)
Well, I think I've set a new record for this message board.

Sent ILR SET M application: 3 Sept
Received by Home Office: 4 Sept
Acknowledgement letter dated: 5 Sept
Received passport back with ILR: 28 January

Pretty pathetic service. Nearly 5 months. I suspect they lost it somewhere during the process, but they wouldn't acknowledge that during my many calls to them.

nellis83
Newly Registered
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:52 am

Post by nellis83 » Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:00 pm

Just wanted to bump this message to see how people were getting on.

My info:

Submitted ILR form - 2/1/10
Received acknowledgement - 5/1/10

Only been 4 weeks so I fear quite a long wait yet....so frustrating!

doodles1810
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:00 pm
Location: London

Set (M) waiting....

Post by doodles1810 » Wed Feb 03, 2010 2:34 pm

Hi everyone,

I applied for my visa on the 11th of Jan 2010, money got taken out of my account on the 12th and I received letter on 13th.

I stupidly had no idea that we could wait up to six months to get our passports back. I know it's only been 3 weeks, but I have already today emailed my local MP about it.

I just feel that 6 months is a joke, if they can take my money a day after I sent my application, surely they can work on it the very next day? I'm so worried that it's lying in a pile on someones desk being forgotten simply because they know they have 6 months to work on them.

My husband and I already paid for a holiday that we would like to take in March this year. (we did this last year already)

Can someone tell me if the HO will send back my husbands passport so that he could at least go on holiday? I don't care if i can't go in the end, but i'd like him to still go with our friends.

I am so worried, it's making me sick. Don't know what to do! Please someone just say something! I just feel so so bad for my husband!

Good luck to everyone else though!

jonbon
Newbie
Posts: 31
Joined: Tue Aug 31, 2004 1:39 pm

Post by jonbon » Wed Feb 03, 2010 4:20 pm

your husband can get his passport back. just call home office. also, the fees is taken by the department in Durham while apps are processed in Sheffield! maybe thats one reason for delay!

daswilts
Newly Registered
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:25 am
Location: Swindon, UK

Post by daswilts » Thu Feb 04, 2010 12:26 pm

My CP Partner applied for Set(m) and send on the 12th Jan, money taken 14th Jan and acknowlegement letter 15th Jan.

We checked the website and already knew it could take 14 weeks to 6 months so haven't booked our planned holiday in June until we get our passports back. I am supprised by the number of people who havent check these waiting times out after already applying for CP and married partners visas.

The cost is high to fund other projects so your £820 doesnt go towards improving the speed of applications from the HO. It does seem that a lot of the waiting time is due to the HO having to wait for other agencies to comfirm your details such as banks employment etc. This is why some cases which are staightforward can take longer than cases that aren't

What I would like to know is has anyone on here still waiting for their ILR after the 6 months?

nellis83
Newly Registered
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:52 am

Post by nellis83 » Mon Feb 08, 2010 6:27 pm

Keep your hopes up guys. My wife was granted SET(M) ILR at the weekend, after only 4 1/2 weeks wait.

Submitted form - 2nd Jan
Acknowledgement Letter - 5th Jan
ILR Stamped - 2nd Feb
Passport Received- 6th Feb

Chuffed to bits. Glad I went the postal route in the end!!

kindley
Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: there
Contact:

Post by kindley » Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:18 pm

nellis83 wrote:Keep your hopes up guys. My wife was granted SET(M) ILR at the weekend, after only 4 1/2 weeks wait.

Submitted form - 2nd Jan
Acknowledgement Letter - 5th Jan
ILR Stamped - 2nd Feb
Passport Received- 6th Feb

Chuffed to bits. Glad I went the postal route in the end!!
Congratulations! That was so cool.
Always Seek Further Opinion (ASFO)

kindley
Member
Posts: 137
Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 10:09 pm
Location: there
Contact:

Post by kindley » Mon Feb 08, 2010 8:23 pm

Did anyone on here applied on form SET (M) in December or at the end of December? If yes, what response have you got from HO?
Always Seek Further Opinion (ASFO)

asimKHAN
Newly Registered
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:17 pm
Location: sheffield
Contact:

APPLIED FOR ILR MORE THEN 6 MONTHS

Post by asimKHAN » Mon Feb 08, 2010 10:34 pm

HI, I HAD APPLIED FOR ILR(SET M) MORE THEN 6 MONTHS AGO ,NO REPLY FROM HOME OFFICE RANG THEM SO MANY TIMES BEFORE 14WEEKS THEY WERE SAYING AND IT CAN TAKE UPTO 14 WEEKS THEN AFTER 14 WEEKS THEY STARTED SAYING THAT 95 APPLICATIONS CAN BE DECIDED WITHIN 6 MONTHS AND NOW ITS MORE THEN 6 MONTHS,NOW THEY HAVE NO ANSWER ,6 MONTHS IS THERE STANDARD,IT MEANS LIKE UK IMMIGRATION HAVE NO STANDARD,IT WILL BE THE WORST IMMEGRATION I HAVE EVER HEARD OFF AND EXPERIENCED OFF,MAY BE THEY HAVE DOUBLE STANDARDS,MY APPLICATION WAS VERY SIMPLE AND STRIGHT,I HAVE A CHILD,LIVING TOGHETHER PURCHASE OWN HOME PAYING TAX FROM THE DAY FIRST DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO NOW,BUT NOW I NEED SOME GOOD SOLICITOR ADDRESS I AM NOT BOTHER ABOUT THIS VISA ,I AM ABOUT I HAVE SPENT ALOT OF MONEY 1000'S IF I TAKES BACK I WILL LOOSE ALL MONEY,I NEED SOME GOOD SOLICITOR NUMBER OR ANY ADVISE.

mochyn
Diamond Member
Posts: 1038
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:02 pm

Re: APPLIED FOR ILR MORE THEN 6 MONTHS

Post by mochyn » Tue Feb 09, 2010 12:11 am

asimKHAN wrote:HI, I HAD APPLIED FOR ILR(SET M) MORE THEN 6 MONTHS AGO ,NO REPLY FROM HOME OFFICE RANG THEM SO MANY TIMES BEFORE 14WEEKS THEY WERE SAYING AND IT CAN TAKE UPTO 14 WEEKS THEN AFTER 14 WEEKS THEY STARTED SAYING THAT 95 APPLICATIONS CAN BE DECIDED WITHIN 6 MONTHS AND NOW ITS MORE THEN 6 MONTHS,NOW THEY HAVE NO ANSWER ,6 MONTHS IS THERE STANDARD,IT MEANS LIKE UK IMMIGRATION HAVE NO STANDARD,IT WILL BE THE WORST IMMEGRATION I HAVE EVER HEARD OFF AND EXPERIENCED OFF,MAY BE THEY HAVE DOUBLE STANDARDS,MY APPLICATION WAS VERY SIMPLE AND STRIGHT,I HAVE A CHILD,LIVING TOGHETHER PURCHASE OWN HOME PAYING TAX FROM THE DAY FIRST DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO NOW,BUT NOW I NEED SOME GOOD SOLICITOR ADDRESS I AM NOT BOTHER ABOUT THIS VISA ,I AM ABOUT I HAVE SPENT ALOT OF MONEY 1000'S IF I TAKES BACK I WILL LOOSE ALL MONEY,I NEED SOME GOOD SOLICITOR NUMBER OR ANY ADVISE.
If your application was simple and straightforward why did you not apply in person?

nellis83
Newly Registered
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:52 am

Re: APPLIED FOR ILR MORE THEN 6 MONTHS

Post by nellis83 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 5:51 am

mochyn wrote:If your application was simple and straightforward why did you not apply in person?
Perhaps for the two reasons I didn't:

1) It's significantly more expensive

2) Booking an appointment is seemingly impossible. (It's obviously possible, but I never had any joy)

daswilts
Newly Registered
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:25 am
Location: Swindon, UK

SET(M)

Post by daswilts » Tue Feb 09, 2010 9:38 am

We also didn't apply in person as it looked like getting an appointment in time would not be easy. Also we didn't want to spend even more money.However, now that I've seen that things can take a long time I wish we had spend the extra £200 for a 24 hour turn around.

My partner applied for his ILR on 12 Jan so it's still early days for us and although should be a straight forward case, it seems that it bears no relatsionship to how long the application takes.

Anyone else applied in early Jan?

mochyn
Diamond Member
Posts: 1038
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2009 10:02 pm

Re: APPLIED FOR ILR MORE THEN 6 MONTHS

Post by mochyn » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:18 am

nellis83 wrote:
mochyn wrote:If your application was simple and straightforward why did you not apply in person?
Perhaps for the two reasons I didn't:

1) It's significantly more expensive

2) Booking an appointment is seemingly impossible. (It's obviously possible, but I never had any joy)
When my wife wanted to apply for ILR after passing her Life in the UK test I went straight on line and found 3 appointment times at Croydon.
The average waiting time is 14 weeks and the extra expense far outweighed the benefits accrued

nellis83
Newly Registered
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:52 am

Re: SET(M)

Post by nellis83 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:23 am

daswilts wrote:We also didn't apply in person as it looked like getting an appointment in time would not be easy. Also we didn't want to spend even more money.However, now that I've seen that things can take a long time I wish we had spend the extra £200 for a 24 hour turn around.

My partner applied for his ILR on 12 Jan so it's still early days for us and although should be a straight forward case, it seems that it bears no relatsionship to how long the application takes.

Anyone else applied in early Jan?
Applied on the 2nd Jan, and had ILR granted last weekend.

daswilts
Newly Registered
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:25 am
Location: Swindon, UK

Post by daswilts » Tue Feb 09, 2010 10:52 am

Yes I saw your post earlier regarding your getting your IRL granted after applying on 2nd Jan. I'm guessing that your case was very straight forward. I am expecting our case to be the same but it does seem also to depend on where you're from. My partner is from Brazil which doesn't seem to be such an issue as those who have partners from Africa or Asia reading some of the other forums.

Where is your partner from orignally?

nellis83
Newly Registered
Posts: 29
Joined: Mon Feb 01, 2010 11:52 am

Post by nellis83 » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:25 am

daswilts wrote:Yes I saw your post earlier regarding your getting your IRL granted after applying on 2nd Jan. I'm guessing that your case was very straight forward. I am expecting our case to be the same but it does seem also to depend on where you're from. My partner is from Brazil which doesn't seem to be such an issue as those who have partners from Africa or Asia reading some of the other forums.

Where is your partner from orignally?
Canada, so I guess that fits with your theory. Pretty straightforward, but other straightforward ones have taken much longer. Luck of the draw it sounds like. Mine was processed in Sheffield.

daswilts
Newly Registered
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Feb 02, 2010 9:25 am
Location: Swindon, UK

Post by daswilts » Tue Feb 09, 2010 11:41 am

Well congrats on getting your IRL. Did you get it back via the special delievery envelope you provided or did they return it via the post office or another carrier?

I'm trying to track our special delivery but I've heard that they dont seem to bother to use that method to return the Passports etc.

Locked