- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
Why was it rejected in May , yet it took 3.5 months for you to recieve response /refusal notice?. If that is the case I can understand why the AIT or BHC are saying your appeal was lodged out of time.Applied 29th April 09
rejected 8th May 09
Recieved response 18th Auguast 09
Lodged Appeal 2nd Sep 09,
ISLakhan19 wrote:Could anyone be kind enough to advise me of the prefix to the tracking number if the case was submitted in Islamabad, i would be extremely appreciative of your advice, many thanks
i have the numbers but do not know the letters that go before
Why was it rejected in May , yet it took 3.5 months for you to recieve response /refusal notice?. If that is the case I can understand why the AIT or BHC are saying your appeal was lodged out of time.batleykhan wrote:You can do one of two things:
Get your hubby to make a new application ensuring you correct the reasons that he was refused on first time around and hope for the best.
As far as your appeal goes
Applied 29th April 09
rejected 8th May 09
Recieved response 18th Auguast 09
Lodged Appeal 2nd Sep 09,
It measn the ECO has this length of time to get the appeal bundle of papers to the AIT in UK,so they can set a date for hearing here in teh UK.This system in Pakistan is rubbish. They should have emailed or contacted me. But no. Kept the papers for long time. AIT said they are not expected all docs to be recieved until 16th March 10. What does that mean?
At the front of the bundle write down all the docs that you are sending.So therefore i have hole punched corners of the orginal documents and placed a treasury tags to secure them ensuring they dont get lost or misplaced this time.So what i want to know is that Holepunching original documents does not compromise their legality or does it ? Batley khan if you could please advise
Hi everyone, I am new to the forum, however I do have an update on this issue.b92753 wrote:Visa refused for following reason
My settlement visa has been refused for the following reason
"I not that you were in pakistan on 24th june 2009 and while you have provided a marriage certificate this document is not evidence of a valid marriage under the pakistan Muslim family ordinance 1961. For your marriage to be valid it must be registered with the union council where you married. You have not provided a Nikah Nama or any evidence that your marriage has been registered.
I am therefore not satisified that you are married to a person present and settled in the united kingdom or who is on the same occasion being admitted for settlement and refuse your application under paragraph 281 section (i) if the immigration rules"
However i did submit a Nikah Nama which was certified and attested and also translated in english and attested. Why did they refuse ?? I didnt the MFLO 1961 was extended to pakistan ? And therefore having the nikha namah attested by the mufti and or the (kutchery) was sufficient ?
Also...LONDON: The British High Commission (BHC) in Islamabad has been accused of refusing hundreds of legitimate spouse visa applications from Azad Kashmir on the basis of confusion created by the recently-changed Nikah forms in Azad Kashmir.
The BHC has recently started refusing applicants with marriage certificates issued in the AJK en bloc on the basis that those certificates do not prove that a valid marriage has been contracted.
Affected families and their legal representatives state that the BHC is refusing to acknowledge that the Nikah forms or marriage certificates in the AJK have changed and no longer mirror those used in mainland Pakistan.
Thousands of people apply to join partners on spouse visas in the UK. A failure by the BHC to understand changes in local laws resulting in the revised marriage certificates being issued has led to unnecessary refusal of their applications, which is proving a nightmare for families.
Under the Pakistan Muslim Family Law Ordinance 1961, the prescribed form issued in Pakistan as proof of a marriage is a Nikah Nama and until recently the same Nikah Namas were also issued in the AJK. It is pertinent to mention that the Pakistan Muslim Family Law Ordinance 1961, which prescribes the form of marriage certificate to be issued in mainland Pakistan, does not apply in Azad Kashmir and this has been accepted in many Asylum and Immigration Tribunal decisions in the United Kingdom.
The government of Azad Kashmir recently prescribed a new form of marriage certificate known as ‘Nikah Khawani’, which is then certified by a Tehsil Mufti. A Nikah Khawani is proof of a valid marriage having been contracted according to the AJK law.
A leading solicitor and immigration expert, who is campaigning on behalf of the affected families, explained that a proclamation was made in May 1988 to amend the form of marriage certificate issued in the AJK to a Nikah Khawani but this change was not actually implemented until recently.
Muhammad Amjad of Dexter Montague solicitors told The News: “It appears that in practice the AJK authorities have continued to issue Nikah Namas until very recently and have only now changed their practice in this regard.