- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, Zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, push
reply from UKBA wrote:There is therefore an error of omission in the current rules which will be amended at the earliest opportunity.
Statement of changes in Immigration Rules HC 628 - October 2013 wrote:133. In paragraph 319E(d)(ii), delete “the specified period is 5 years” and substitute “the specified period is a continuous period of 5 years”.
134. In paragraph 319E(d)(ii)(c), after “where applicable,” insert "with leave".
Thank you very much for pointing it out. I was expecting this by end of october 2013. Can you if you don't mind clarify what is the change in 134 319E(d)(ii)©? My understanding since from start if there was no "and" between 319E(d)(ii) (b) and © then ( C ) can easliy allow currently on dependant visa EC after 9th July 2012 to amalgamate previous non-dependant leave but and is an issue - is that right understanding? Now, what change this "with leave" will play in ( c) - does it mean now it will not count non-dependant leaves?vinny wrote:reply from UKBA wrote:There is therefore an error of omission in the current rules which will be amended at the earliest opportunity.
Statement of changes in Immigration Rules HC 628 - October 2013 wrote:133. In paragraph 319E(d)(ii), delete “the specified period is 5 years” and substitute “the specified period is a continuous period of 5 years”.
134. In paragraph 319E(d)(ii)(c), after “where applicable,” insert "with leave".
To(c) have spent the remainder of the 5 year period, where applicable, as the spouse or civil partner, unmarried or same-sex partner of that person at a time when that person had leave under another category of these Rules.
You think correctly.(c) have spent the remainder of the 5 year period, where applicable with leave, as the spouse or civil partner, unmarried or same-sex partner of that person at a time when that person had leave under another category of these Rules.
Thanks for being kind, I saw your reply after posting my reply.D4109125 wrote:Yes, the leave will have to be as the spouse or civil partner, unmarried or same-gender partner.
Vinny - do you mean there is no mention of dependant as per the reading or it is I am taking it wrong.