Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Yes that is exactly the point to reduce immigration, not to cover bureaucratic costs.jess1959 wrote:Another money making con, to justify the governments claim to reducing immigration, if we cant reduce it, we will price them out of the market. With the introduction of minimum earnings, £18,500 and the new Life in the UK test, which even the government cant pass, the introduction of NHS fees and the increase in visa fees. Once more the government are targeting the lower and middle classes. Being a white, british male, married to a non EU citizen the government is slowly killing off our abilities to marry and love the people we want to. Our new ILR cost as risen 25%. Anyone who goes for a fast track visa, can get one in under 2 hours. That equates to £1.150 per hour. x 2 to cover her son. Who on earth can justify charging £1,150 for paperwork. Think I may be in the wrong job. What really annoys me, if I was a EU citizen from another EU country it wouldnt cost me anything, if I lived in the UK.
That sentiment has been expressed earlier.jess1959 wrote:What really annoys me, if I was a EU citizen from another EU country it wouldnt cost me anything, if I lived in the UK.
The current LITUK test is frightfully easy to pass, if one knows British history and politics. I found the previous one more difficult, but even that required maybe two days worth of study. I agree with seasky that the LITUK test ensures that new citizens are aware of the basics of the country to which they swear allegiance to.jess1959 wrote:the new Life in the UK test, which even the government cant pass,
It used to be much easier just 4 years ago. Spouses of British citizens used to get ILR in two years, followed by citizenship in the third year. However, it was to combat sham marriages that in 2012, spousal ILR was moved to five years, with an intermediary FLR(M).seasky wrote:Saying that for spouses of British citizens it should be easy to get ILR/Naturalization.