100% agree. My wife works also. In fact, her company is now questioning her Right to Work. The process for companies to check (ECS) is so convoluted for HR clerks to follow. We are working with them to resolve but with no or very little information to contribute (just an application reference number), it is only adding to the frustration. This may have become off topic, but still relevant none the less.
sean2606 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 11:05 amlimey10 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 19, 2021 10:48 amHi Sean2606
I agree, it's nice to see others getting their approvals but with no apparent reason why some categories are prioritised over others. Or are Set (M) applicants simply not posting their results? It's super frustrating - with no way of checking other than calling and receiving the "well it hasn't been 6 months yet" answer. I haven't called because I know that I will be upset to hear those words.
At the same time, I read recently of someone calling only to be told that their biometrics had been lost. Whether that is true or not only adds additional uncertainty to the whole "situation." I was going to say process, but it isn't really a process is it.
Hi Limey10, there was a Sep SET(M) who received their decision. I too read the post where HO said they had misplaced the applicant's biometrics, shameful!! that HO couldn't be bothered to contact the applicant and ask them to redo their biometrics.
Other kinds of applications are receiving quicker decisions due to them "contributing to the economy"! but my wife works too and pays tax so does contribute in a way.
