Post
by 1400 Years » Thu Jul 12, 2007 7:32 am
Received documents yesterday afternoon.
Scored 75 points, but could not meet the English language requirements; hence refused.
My IELTS had expired on 14.05.2007 (had scored 8.5 band) so sent along my MA English Literature (2 year certificate) and MBA (1.5 year certificate), which are considered equivalent to UK Bachelor degrees ... but then these, although considered equivalent to UK BA level degrees all right, for my country, these are considered higher level degrees (that's what they wrote citing NARIC).
The thing is that during my BA and BCommerce degrees (which I didn't send because these I thought aren't equivalent to UK Bachelor degrees) we were passive learners. More like cabbages than students. More than 120 students in the class, and the teacher blaring out stuff and no interaction from the students, no presentations, no quizzes - just mid term and final term exams and off we went. So to me these didn't fit the criteria of "displaying a level of competence in each of the four areas of language skills"; but in the MA English and MBA, we had lots of presentations, seminar-style classes, loads of quizzes and assignments which aptly and comprehensively exercised our English language skills ... and so ... out of dead [and foolish!] honesty, if you will ... I sent these degrees, along with a letter (as they require) from the MBA awarding institution. (The MA English Literature degree speaks for itself.)
Thus far, in all my travels abroad, I have never been rejected on any visa application because I have maintained dead honesty as I have known that these guys appreciate one's being upright about one's case; and I thought it should work this time too.
As supplementary evidence (not asked for, I know, but who knows what might suddenly work with these people - again from prior experience), I had also provided a CD of my voice overs in English, a short-short UK film I had played lead role in (film was in English), my English news bulletin clips as news anchor, and some of my newspaper and magazine articles (in English) that I had written from 1992 to 2004. Clearly they would have none of these!
I also have an MA English for Specific Purposes from University of Warwick, UK, and also taught and designed courses in English at the university for a year.
And then I had this job offer from University of Birmingham for work as Instructor of English - for which of course, I had to apply in English, be grilled in the interview session via conference telephone in English, and then be approved to teach English in English in one of the popular universities in Britain - but none of that worked as evidence for my all round English language skills.
But if I had sent in a degree certificate from more than 12 years ago in which we DIDN'T need to display any English language skills except pass the degree course by rote learning, I suppose they would have been convinced indeed about my language skills.
[And yet they wouldn't trust an IELTS score that expired only a month before the application was sent. (I wasn't relying on it though, which is why I sent in the degree certificates.)]
So, yes, I would appeal, but do you think the above arguments would be a strong bases?
Could I not, as a last sentence, write to them, that according to their published guidance book, they say that "we may ask an applicant to do the IELTS"; couldn't they have asked me to do that???
After all, all the rest of my credentials were well supported with evidence.
(Please do not get personal anyone; only pragmatic responses are welcomed. I erred out of [silly] honesty, but there we are.)