ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

New Info on Court Case

Forum to discuss all things Blarney | Ireland immigration

Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, Administrator

Locked
runie80
Member of Standing
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 9:17 pm

Post by runie80 » Sat Jun 16, 2007 12:24 pm

I think protest wont make a damn difference

if u go city center on weekend and u see all these NGO and groups protesting there and no one gives a damn about it

I think protest is a the right word but it should be done in a way that it gets attention and get results not just wasting our time more with no results

As i said arranging a meeting with the "justice minister" on behalf of us all for half an hour or something like that

May be it will give results

anyone has any Valuable ideas ?

The important thing is to get to know whats the new DOJ ministers stance on this is . If its same like the Fcuker Mc Dowell than its all pointless
coz his policies were not powered by justice or equality they were just based on discrimination and race
In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing.

BigAppleWoodenShoe
Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:50 pm
Location: Cork, Ireland

Post by BigAppleWoodenShoe » Sat Jun 16, 2007 1:52 pm

I think protesting would not make a difference for our cases.

But it is the only thing left to do. For our own health we need to get the word out to the world and point the Irish to this mishap.

Also for future immigrants we need to figure this out so it will not happen to them either.

BigApple says that writing to all Irish embassies abroad explaining them that you won't get in in 6 months, that it is not easy, and that you might not get in at all is a good idea, just to get the word out and to stop the flow of people like us. (I am WoodenShoe by the way ;) )
Dutch husband, American wife, applied for a residence card, after 7 months got a Stamp 4 visa for two years. :)

walrusgumble
BANNED
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:30 am
Location: ireland

Post by walrusgumble » Sat Jun 16, 2007 9:54 pm

[quote="runie80"]I think protest wont make a damn difference

if u go city center on weekend and u see all these NGO and groups protesting there and no one gives a damn about it

I think protest is a the right word but it should be done in a way that it gets attention and get results not just wasting our time more with no results

As i said arranging a meeting with the "justice minister" on behalf of us all for half an hour or something like that

May be it will give results

anyone has any Valuable ideas ?

protest? might be too risky to be honest, so i agree that it might not be a good idea. i am sure will know why it might be risky if there were gardai about.

any way ideas, some time last week 13/6/2007 in the irish times, a writer had a one page article/ story about a danish lady who is married to a man from algeria. and like ye, they cant live in denmark. the article talks about how tough the danish immigration is. the story basically gives the reader an interpretation of how crap things are because every morning this danish lady commutes from malmo (sweden) were they can live together in order to go to college. now to many irish people who would have read this would think tut tut that is terrible (and there would) but how many know that this same treatment is happening in ireland. the guys name is Ruadhan Mac Cormaic. might be worth while contacting him to get an article, surely he would be interested in some so called contraversial stories in ireland. he gets his story and you get your publicity and the kumar case will be highlighted. in all, pressure would be tilted against government.

SanMex
Newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 5:20 pm

Post by SanMex » Sun Jun 17, 2007 3:12 am

I found in this link http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/im ... ily_en.htm
"This Directive does not apply in the United Kingdom, Ireland or Denmark"
mmm...does this means we arer doomed?

BigAppleWoodenShoe
Member
Posts: 103
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 5:50 pm
Location: Cork, Ireland

Post by BigAppleWoodenShoe » Sun Jun 17, 2007 10:57 am

Yes, walrusgrumble, I think we have to bring attention to the case in different ways. I used to live with an Irish girl a few years ago, and we reconnected. Come to find out, she works for a newspaper (I think she said the Herald) in Dublin and has her own column on Thursdays. I am going to ask (beg, plead, grovel) her to see if she can do a story on us. She's not a big-time person there, but at least it's an in to the newspaper. I think the paper is only in Dublin, but, hey, it's a start. But I think everyone should write their local senator (or whatever they call it here). I might be kicked out, but I am going out yelling!!! :wink:
Dutch husband, American wife, applied for a residence card, after 7 months got a Stamp 4 visa for two years. :)

runie80
Member of Standing
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 9:17 pm

Post by runie80 » Sun Jun 17, 2007 11:03 am

SanMex wrote:I found in this link http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/im ... ily_en.htm
"This Directive does not apply in the United Kingdom, Ireland or Denmark"
mmm...does this means we arer doomed?
well i guess no point in trying if this statement is correct ?

can anyone cross check and let us know do we still have hope or this is it.

What strickes me is that they mentoned UK in this. but UK is giving spouce visas AFAIK any or may be i am reading it wrong ?
In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing.

microlab
Member
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 1:43 pm

Post by microlab » Sun Jun 17, 2007 12:23 pm

Third country nationals who hold a residence permit valid for at least one year in one of the Member States and who have the genuine option of long-term residence can apply for family reunification. However, this Directive does not apply to a third country national applying for recognition of refugee status whose application has not yet given rise to a final decision or who has temporary forms of protection, nor to members of the family of a Union citizen.

http://europa.eu/scadplus/leg/en/lvb/l33118.htm

Flor_mz
Junior Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 11:40 am
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Post by Flor_mz » Sun Jun 17, 2007 12:34 pm

Yes, this seems to be for Non-EU nationals residing legally who want to bring their Non-EU family to Europe.

It has nothing to do with us (family of an EU national).
Florencia

brownbonno
Member
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:02 pm
Netherlands

Post by brownbonno » Sun Jun 17, 2007 12:49 pm

The issue in the directive in question has no relevance to spouse/family member of an EU national.Its centred on the rights of third country national legally residing within the EC member states and their family unification.
The cases of members of this forum is derived from Directive 2004/38/EU.
Knowledge is Power

runie80
Member of Standing
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 9:17 pm

Post by runie80 » Sun Jun 17, 2007 1:09 pm

brownbonno wrote:The issue in the directive in question has no relevance to spouse/family member of an EU national.Its centred on the rights of third country national legally residing within the EC member states and their family unification.
The cases of members of this forum is derived from Directive 2004/38/EU.
I have always said "BrownBono is the man" and everytime you write here something you confirm that.

You definately are one of the most Knowledgable people with regards to EU directive and if in future we need representative i believe you definately cen represent.

Keep up the good work !
In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing.

walrusgumble
BANNED
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:30 am
Location: ireland

Post by walrusgumble » Sun Jun 17, 2007 1:13 pm

runie80 wrote:
SanMex wrote:I found in this link http://ec.europa.eu/justice_home/fsj/im ... ily_en.htm
"This Directive does not apply in the United Kingdom, Ireland or Denmark"
mmm...does this means we arer doomed?
well i guess no point in trying if this statement is correct ?

can anyone cross check and let us know do we still have hope or this is it.

What strickes me is that they mentoned UK in this. but UK is giving spouce visas AFAIK any or may be i am reading it wrong ?
you might have notice my past posts could have been intrepreted doubt on whether or not the kumar case would be successful, by stating issues that eu law could not impose on any country as each country still enjoys soverignity when putting directives into domestic law. another example of where ireland, britain and denamark never went a long with other european countries was the schegen scheme. but, i am not a judge. we dont know what will happen. maybe a disentin obiter from a judge will highlight an issue that might be used in another case similar to kumar.

basically, and again i know its easy for me to say, but there is no point giving up now considering how far many of ye have come. it is going to be very very very hard for a justice minister to consider deporting people

who have being in this country for over 3 years,

who are in a geniune marriage,

who have a child born here (if one of the parents is irish, that child might be able to use section 7 of nationality and citizenship act 1956-2004 (citizens by decent of irish parent), if one of the parents is european, they could get citizenship from that european parent)

or if

at some point one of ye people were intially legal resident and working due to work permits etc, ye have proven that ye have connection with the state and capability to not be a burden to the state.

what i am trying to say is that maybe it would not hurt if ye make an application to the repatriation unit at irish naturalisation and immigration section, dept of justice, 13/14 burgh quay, dublin 2. the application that ye could make is "an application purusant to section 3 of the immigration act 1999." it is also known as humanitarian application for leave to remain in the state. it will cost ye nothing unless ye get a more professional application done by a solicitor. the decision is at the discretion of the minister. dont send original documents just copies. the following style it should be in:

1. Name (a bit obvious)

2. Address in the State (you might be worried, if refused but you have to give actual address in order to receive a reply, alternatively, if worried use mates address)

3. department of Justice number (if any, its the 69 number which ends with year that you first registered, people who may have applied for refugee status will know what i am saying)

4. age (veryhard to remove an eldery person, if they have been here a long time)

5. date arrival in the state.

6. family and domestic circumstances
this is were you state that your married to an eu national, state how long the relationship was before you married (if a long time) when you got married. any children? where were they born? documents to use could be a copy of marriage cert, copy of birth certs, copy of front photgraph page of eu spouses passport, bank statements with both names on it to show that you have lived together in a home as a family unit. even better a letter from a landlord (if he/she knew both of ye where living together and charging both of ye rent) if possible a letter from a priest/pastor/or muslim leader who married ye (if in the state) or who baptised yer children, the letter would state that he knows ye and states that ye are in a loving family etc. alternatively a letter from a well known neighbour. (these will help to support your case. you can imagine that the spouse who is entitiled to work and does, well who normally takes care of the children while spouse at work? you naturally.does children's interest need to be a priority? yes , for the care and parentage of both parents.

7.
connection with the state.
here you will hammer home (pardon the slang) the amount of time you have been here. for many you will have intergrated into irish society. maybe some of ye might have previously being allowed to legally work in the state, if so show a copy of your old work permit or letter from old boss or p60 (make sure you were legally allowed to work here thou, never mention work unless you were allowed). are any of ye involved in community groups or sports teams? if so get a letter from these people (many people will be aware of these issues as they may have done them before for others like ye). some of ye might have been students here in ireland (show copy of letter from college confirming this) again you also emphasis you family connections . all this helps to prove you could be as the saying goes "more irish than the irish themselves"

8. Humanitarian issues that you wish to bring to the attention of the Minister.
here, you would emphasis the hardship for you and your family if you had to go to another country in order to remain as a famiy unit. for some eu spouses, they maybe from places such as east europe (please i dont mean to offend) or africa or middle east where human rights protection is not actually on the governments list of priorities. could you be able to send your child to a school in those countries? can you genuinely go back to your country? (reason for coming here shows things were not great back home, as i say i dont mean to offend, but it may be valid points, try a strenghten ones case) for documentary evidence of a country, or country of origin as it is known go to www.ecoi.net, www.amnesty.org, check out human rights report and religious freedom report from the us dept of state web www.us.gov, or uk home office country of orign reports www.homeoffice.gov.uk. (these are just examples)

9.
employment history
10. employment prospects in this state.
in no 9 and 10, the minister wishes to see if one would be a burden on the state if granted residency. i am sure many many of ye are highly qualiied people in your country, or business people, etc. copies of college degrees or employment documents could help you here. it might be possible that you know somebody in this state who would employ you if it were not for you not being allowed to work, due to your current status. it may be possible that you might be able to get a letter from that person which would state that he knows you and he would have no problems employing you.

11. representations by you or made on your behalf.
here, you yourself could make a letter stating you case. alternativley you could ask members of the community to write a letter, these letters are like references, or character references. so examples include as stated before, letters from community memebers such as the church/mosque or social and sport leaders or people who know you, landlords etc.

12. here you would state that you have never come to the adverse attention of the police in ireland or the country of origin. you would state that you are a law abidding citizen and a person of impeccable conduct and character. (if by any chance that one has been in trouble, for the love of god do not mention it.

lastly, 13. reason why you should not be deported or refoulement.
here (this is where a legal person could come in handy) you briefly restate sections 1-12. state how returning you might violate your rights under article 8 of european convention on human rights (family and private life), rights of eu spouse to family reunification. some of ye may fear for your life (relates to failed asylum seekers) if returned to your country of orign.


these headings 1-13 are issues that the minister must decide on when considering deporting someone. making one is better than sitting around feeling sorry for your self (just keep your case highlighted to the dept). speak to immigration council about it. if you are successul, you are intially given residence and freedom to work for one year. and so long as you are still in a family unit, not getting into trouble and working, it should normally be extended. however, it will take a good period of time before it is processed. but then you could keep writting to them asking for a decision and asking them to acknowledge the safe receipt of the application. if application takes over 8 months and you had continued to send a letter then go to a lawyer. the possible remedy could be after solicitor giving a warning letter, would be to go to the high court seeking an order of mandamus (bad spelling) forcing the minister to make a decision, considering the serious delay, it might be possible that some form of residency is given,

some of ye might have already done this. some of ye might be sick and tired of waiting. i am just giving ye some ideas of what to do, (just trying to help) if ye make such an application make sure that you keep yourself a copy of such application and a copy of any correspondence from the dept.

brownbonno
Member
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:02 pm
Netherlands

Post by brownbonno » Sun Jun 17, 2007 1:35 pm

runie80 wrote:
brownbonno wrote:The issue in the directive in question has no relevance to spouse/family member of an EU national.Its centred on the rights of third country national legally residing within the EC member states and their family unification.
The cases of members of this forum is derived from Directive 2004/38/EU.
I have always said "BrownBono is the man" and everytime you write here something you confirm that.

You definately are one of the most Knowledgable people with regards to EU directive and if in future we need representative i believe you definately cen represent.

Keep up the good work !
Renie80,Thanks for the commendation.Knowledge not shared is a waste.

walrusgumble,

Remember people concerned in this cases are spouse/family members of EC citizens.They should not be portraits as asylum seeker and should try not(directly or indirectly) be seeking asylum.
It is as at now clear with the Jia case,that ''live in another state'' is not a yardstick for free movement.
Forum members should make appeal on an refusal decision based on the Jia case(this is only case law at the moment).Instead of waiting for the Judgement on the ''Kumar case''
Knowledge is Power

runie80
Member of Standing
Posts: 488
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 9:17 pm

Post by runie80 » Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:00 pm

walrusgumble

I personally believe that applying for humanatarian grounds and etc etc are just a smoke screen.Why we apply for something which is less of a right when our rights of major importance<spouse of eu citizen> are not granted.

Your sugessions might be usefull for someone who dont have a career and just have his all life to get "VISA"

For me personally this is it.If they have to give me Visa it will be EU spouse i will not seek alternatives.

I am a man seeking career and life.I dont have time to waste all my life for this Bloddy Visa.There is loads more to life then just this visa.

I will be looking all other options after this month.Waiting years in this system might suit those who dont have careers.

I know we shouldnt give up for our right and i have never compromised on my principles but when i see the time frame in order to pursue this thing i feel i am missing the bigger picture

On the other hand I will go UK or Poland and if nothing work our there After 6 months i will be back here with all the requirements of Irish Gov
and then they dont have a leg to stand on !
In any moment of decision, the best thing you can do is the right thing, the next best thing is the wrong thing, and the worst thing you can do is nothing.

walrusgumble
BANNED
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:30 am
Location: ireland

Post by walrusgumble » Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:13 pm

brownbonno wrote:
runie80 wrote:
brownbonno wrote:The issue in the directive in question has no relevance to spouse/family member of an EU national.Its centred on the rights of third country national legally residing within the EC member states and their family unification.
The cases of members of this forum is derived from Directive 2004/38/EU.
I have always said "BrownBono is the man" and everytime you write here something you confirm that.

You definately are one of the most Knowledgable people with regards to EU directive and if in future we need representative i believe you definately cen represent.

Keep up the good work !
Renie80,Thanks for the commendation.Knowledge not shared is a waste.

walrusgumble,

Remember people concerned in this cases are spouse/family members of EC citizens.They should not be portraits as asylum seeker and should try not(directly or indirectly) be seeking asylum.
It is as at now clear with the Jia case,that ''live in another state'' is not a yardstick for free movement.
Forum members should make appeal on an refusal decision based on the Jia case(this is only case law at the moment).Instead of waiting for the Judgement on the ''Kumar case''
you are correct. when i said asylum seekers, i was referring to some people who may have come to ireland as such people and unfortunatley be refused., and then whilst in ireland fall in love and marry an eu person. basically when i mentioned ayslum seekers i was referring to those people who have also applied for eu1.

these people would not be able, willing or could be expected to return to their countries in order to enjoy family reunification if ireland refused the non eu spouse to reunite in this state. the eu spouse might not be willing to go to their spouses country either or to return to their own country in order to stay as a family. as for the european spouse, many might have came to ireland because of various hardships in their country. so how could one expect to live in another eu state on those potential issues? what can a family do if the non eu spouse cant stay in ireland? separate? that would be wrong, considering our constitution prohibits attacks on the family unit. would this be a violation to one's rights under article 8 of ECHR?

for those who were not asylum seekers, how many of ye would be willing to return to your country for various reasons, be it lack of employement, badly runned country etc? (sounds like ireland in some respects)

i agree one should not wait for the kumar case. i agree that one should appeal their decisions on the eu1 issue on the Jia case.
but what if kumar or jia case is rejected by the highest authority (supreme court, if it has to go that far) what then, how many people will be able to afford to take their case to european court, will solvit be willing to pay some of the legal fees?what if the irish authorites succefully argue to the european ct that jia should not be applied in this issue?

that is why i suggested the leave to remain application pursuant to section 3, as a short term solution whilst waiting for these cases to be heard and finalised. but alias, you are absolutely correct. i was just suggesting other options to the time being.

walrusgumble
BANNED
Posts: 1279
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:30 am
Location: ireland

Post by walrusgumble » Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:28 pm

runie80 wrote:walrusgumble

I personally believe that applying for humanatarian grounds and etc etc are just a smoke screen.Why we apply for something which is less of a right when our rights of major importance<spouse of eu citizen> are not granted.

Your sugessions might be usefull for someone who dont have a career and just have his all life to get "VISA"

For me personally this is it.If they have to give me Visa it will be EU spouse i will not seek alternatives.

I am a man seeking career and life.I dont have time to waste all my life for this Bloddy Visa.There is loads more to life then just this visa.

I will be looking all other options after this month.Waiting years in this system might suit those who dont have careers.

I know we shouldnt give up for our right and i have never compromised on my principles but when i see the time frame in order to pursue this thing i feel i am missing the bigger picture

On the other hand I will go UK or Poland and if nothing work our there After 6 months i will be back here with all the requirements of Irish Gov
and then they dont have a leg to stand on !
fair enough, i do understand your situation.

i was just commenting on the possiblity of the status quo being upheld. (hopefully things will change, because it could be possible that other eu countries might do the same as ireland in a few years time. maybe irish people will want to go to say france or italy etc and bring their non eu spouse with them but have not lived in other country. then they would be in a similar situation. hence why i feel this current issue should be brought to the everyone's attention who lives in this country)

brownbonno
Member
Posts: 176
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 12:02 pm
Netherlands

Post by brownbonno » Sun Jun 17, 2007 2:29 pm

Well the Jia case is still standing without further challenge.
No ranting today,but the Irish should what is right.Remember in all her refusal decision,there in no mention of removal or to leave the country.If they do,Article 8 will challenge such action.
Knowledge is Power

dsab85
Member
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:44 am

Post by dsab85 » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:57 pm

Hi together,

it appears to be true that the court has decided in favour of the Justice Department in the Kumar Case. I just got the following response from Solvit:

****************
The Irish SOLVIT Centre understands that the Court has decided in favour of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. However, we have not received the approved written Judgment yet. This will be posted on the Courts Service website (www.courts.ie). There is also the possibility that the case will be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Until SOLVIT receive instruction from the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform, we cannot advise on refused residency applications. I will let you know as soon as we receive further information.
****************

Just FYI.

Cheers,
dsab85

bulmash
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2007 9:57 am

oy!

Post by bulmash » Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:21 pm

I was hoping because so many of you had been at the courthouse and heard that it was postponed till the 26th, that maybe there was a silver lining.

Sadly, no. I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm feeling sick to my stomach.

Well, we are not giving up and I'm planning on leaving the country to visit Sweden and go back to the States for a visit. I'll keep everyone posted on what the lawyer advises me as far as leaving and re-entry.

Best to everyone...
bulmash

Birdy
Member
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 9:18 am
Location: In Plymouth Eating Indian Food

Post by Birdy » Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:55 pm

Stacks of boxes in my house. Packed and ready to leave. Sailing the 24th interview the 26th

To all of you who are staying on fighting he fine fight may something happen in all of your favour.

Good luck to you all.
Happy now in the U.K. not so happy about the Rugby

dsab85
Member
Posts: 224
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 10:44 am

Post by dsab85 » Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:00 pm

Yes, I am sitting on packed boxes as well. Might even return in a year or so, because then I will have lived somewhere else within the EU with my wife. :? Still very strange...

megmog
Member
Posts: 162
Joined: Wed Sep 06, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by megmog » Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:08 pm

I feel sick :(

archigabe
Moderator
Posts: 1238
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 9:59 am
Location: Dublin

Post by archigabe » Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:41 pm

dsab85 wrote:Hi together,

it appears to be true that the court has decided in favour of the Justice Department in the Kumar Case. I just got the following response from Solvit:

****************
The Irish SOLVIT Centre understands that the Court has decided in favour of the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform. However, we have not received the approved written Judgment yet. This will be posted on the Courts Service website (www.courts.ie). There is also the possibility that the case will be appealed to the Supreme Court.

Until SOLVIT receive instruction from the Department of Justice, Equality and Law Reform, we cannot advise on refused residency applications. I will let you know as soon as we receive further information.
****************

Just FYI.

Cheers,
dsab85
that's troubling news...we really don't know the immigration history of Kumar, and if it was any way similar to Akrich who was a moroccan immigrant deported twice from the UK, before he used a british woman to try to immigrate to Ireland.
Maybe the Irish authorities will treat each case individually, like the asylum cases being decided individually in the courts?

SanMex
Newbie
Posts: 34
Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2007 5:20 pm

Post by SanMex » Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:50 pm

Well how about we involve the media now I mean how many families are going to destroy with this stupid law?
Dont you think this situation is worthy of a news paper?

joesoap101
Member of Standing
Posts: 333
Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: California

Post by joesoap101 » Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:49 pm

Seriously, Ireland isn’t that great... trust me- after living here for more than 6 years I have a fair idea... Go somewhere else until they get their act together and enjoy the adventure away from the soggy bog, until you feel you MUST return and hopefully by then the EU have forced the hand of the dept of justice to stop being belligerent

Sahil
Junior Member
Posts: 74
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 12:54 pm

Post by Sahil » Tue Jun 19, 2007 7:54 am

http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/irelan ... 75932.html

This is the artical in The Irish Times Re High court ruling!!

Locked
cron