- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
No, 10 months is too far short, some people seem to be able to string out to ten years by making in-time applications for pointless visas and appealing and appealing just to get there under Section 3c but for me I find that morally reprehensible, suppose it's up to your conscience...Haebid79 wrote:#Wanderer & Manchi, Thanks people for the Valuable advise.
I'm currently doing an MBA whose Visa will see me to February 2015. I will qualify for 10 years long stay in December 2015. I'm trying to avoid extending based on MPhil or PhD to bridge up the 10 months gap between Feb and Dec because of the fees-just too expensive, can not afford to part away with the amount being demanded to do these courses. Furthermore, to be honest, I'm also simply exhausted with this study business!
Apart from Tier 2 and Tier 4, which other route would be the safest? Can I apply based on 10 years when I still have 10 months to go, I mean applying at the end of Feb 2015 when the Tier 4 expires-what would be the consequences of such an act?
Please any more further advise will be greatly appreciated.
For seven year thing think someone has to be British/settled, not sure....Haebid79 wrote:Thanks guys-greatly appreciated.
So please what would be your advise considering my position-which is the safest route I should adhere to, to avoid refusal casualty once my current one expires? I have two kids clocking 7 years stay in January 2015, any chances of success applying based on kids 7 yrs concession, considering we are living as a family, I mean my wife and I are not separated -we live under one roof as a family.
Please, please your contributions are very very essential kindly advise....
Many thanks.
3.2.7 Consideration of Section EX: Exception wrote:EX.1. – (a) (i) the applicant has a genuine & subsisting relationship with a child who: (aa) is under the age of 18 years or was under the age of 18 years when the applicant was first granted leave on the basis that this paragraph applied;
(bb) is in the UK;
(cc) is a British citizen or has lived continuously in the UK for at least the 7 years immediately preceding the date of application; and
(ii) it would not be reasonable to expect the child to leave the UK;