Immigrationboards.com - Archive

Archive » United Kingdom » That's interesting

AuthorPost
Thorsten von Thyssen
Member
Member # 4397
Posted February 23, 2004 04:15 PM
You can also aggregate time spent under HSMP with the following (for ILR purposes):
1. Years spent as a dependent of a WP holder (or as a dependent of any person in a category that leads to settlement).
2. Years spent as an unmarried dependent.

[ February 23, 2004: Message edited by: Thorsten von Thyssen ]

--------------------

-----------------------------------
...cut the bullshit please...

Dip
Member
Member # 4428
Posted February 23, 2004 04:20 PM
TVT,

Is that a question? or a fact?

I am actually looking for an answer myself on point #1. I think one can amalgamate the dependent status with HSMP but if you have heard something firm let me know.

Rgds
Dip

Thorsten von Thyssen
Member
Member # 4397
Posted February 23, 2004 04:22 PM
Just to exemplify:


You come to the UK with your girlfriend who comes here on an ancestry visa. You get an unmarried partners LTE. You then spend three and a half years here as her dependent.

You then apply for HSMP. After six months on HSMP you are entitled to get ILR.

[ February 23, 2004: Message edited by: Thorsten von Thyssen ]

--------------------

-----------------------------------
...cut the bullshit please...

Thorsten von Thyssen
Member
Member # 4397
Posted February 23, 2004 04:37 PM
That is the outcome of the Immigration Rules:

"
135G. Indefinite leave to remain may be granted, on application, to a person currently with leave as a highly skilled migrant, provided that he:

(i) has had a continuous period of at least 4 years' leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom in this capacity or has had a continuous period of at least 4 years' leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom which includes periods of leave to enter or remain granted under paragraphs 128 - 319 of these Rules; and ..."

As you can see time spent under HSMP can be amalgamated with periods spend under other immigration categories in sections 128 to 319 of the Immigration Rules.

1 above is found in section s. 195 of the rules.

2 above is found in s. 295k.

--------------------

-----------------------------------
...cut the bullshit please...

Dip
Member
Member # 4428
Posted February 23, 2004 04:56 PM
Very helpful.

Thanks a ton.

Regards
Dip

Dip
Member
Member # 4428
Posted February 23, 2004 05:05 PM
TVT ... looking for the URL, Google doesnt seem to be very helpful here.

Any chance of a cut paste of the URL link on s.195

Regards
Dip

Thorsten von Thyssen
Member
Member # 4397
Posted February 23, 2004 05:28 PM
http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/default.asp?PageId=3203

--------------------

-----------------------------------
...cut the bullshit please...

Joseph01
Member
Member # 7141
Posted February 23, 2004 05:31 PM
The link to the rules are at
http://www.ind.homeoffice.gov.uk/default.asp?PageId=3185

TVT

For that matter, HSMP can be combined with almost everything else except visas like Student, Working Holidaymakers, and Au Pair visas:

Here's a listing of the categories 128-319:

quote:

Work permit employment 128-135
Highly skilled migrants 135A-135H
Sectors-Based Scheme 135I-135K
Representatives of overseas newspapers, news agencies and broadcasting organisations 136-143
Sole representatives 144-151
Private servants in diplomatic households 152-159
Domestic workers in private households 159A-159H
Overseas government employees 160-168
Ministers of religion, missionaries and members of religious orders 169-177
Airport based operational ground staff of overseas owned airlines 178-185
Persons with United Kingdom ancestry 186-193
Spouses of persons with limited leave to enter or remain under paragraphs 128-193 (but not paragraphs 135I-135K) 194-196
Children of persons with limited leave to enter or remain under paragraphs 128-193 (but not paragraphs 135I-135K) 197-199
Multiple entry work permit employment 199A-199L

Part 6: Persons seeking to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as a businessman, self-employed person, investor, writer, composer or artist

Persons intending to establish themselves in business 200-210
Innovators 210A-210H
Persons intending to establish themselves in business under the provisions of EC Association Agreements 211-223
Investors 224-231
Writers, composers and artists 232-239
Spouses of persons with limited leave to enter or remain under paragraphs 200-239 240-242
Children of persons with limited leave to enter or remain under paragraphs 200-239 243-245

Part 7: Other Categories

Persons exercising rights of access to a child resident in the United Kingdom 246-248
EEA nationals and their families 255-262
Retired persons of independent means 263-270
Spouses of persons with limited leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as retired persons of independent means 271-273
Children of persons with limited leave to enter or remain in the United Kingdom as retired persons of independent means 274-276
Long residence 276A-276E

Part 8: Family Members

Spouses 277-289
Victims of domestic violence 289A-289C
Fiance(e)s 290-295
Unmarried partners 295AA-295O
Children 296-316
Parents, grandparents and other dependent relatives 317-319



One thing is for sure, it removes any doubt about whether time spent on TWES counts toward ILR. TWES doesn't necessarily count when combined with other work permits (it may on an exception basis), but TWES definitely counts when combined with HSMP!

Joseph

Thorsten von Thyssen
Member
Member # 4397
Posted February 23, 2004 06:13 PM
I don't think the HO intended HSMP to be aggregated with TWES (does not lead to settlement).

--------------------

-----------------------------------
...cut the bullshit please...

Kayalami
Member
Member # 5984
Posted February 23, 2004 06:27 PM
J01 - to add to TVT's comment TWES is under paras 116-121 just outside the 128-319 range for HSMP amalgamation for ILR. Don't recall this at all so it must be relatively new. However a closer review of the actual periods considered narrows the suitable options considerably especially those linked to ILR via a settled spouse/ partner (2yrs) so all in all a clever move by the HO although in some cases superfolous.

--------------------

---audi alteram partem---

kim2004
Junior Member
Member # 6512
Posted February 23, 2004 06:32 PM
Thats Interesting ..

If TWES is to be counted to HSMP, thats means if i get HSMP today .. i will be able to get ILR tomorrow?
i am 2 years TWES and 3.5 years WP..
tried to apply for ILr one year ago and HO said TWES is no counted...

cheers...

Kayalami
Member
Member # 5984
Posted February 23, 2004 06:54 PM
quote:
If TWES is to be counted to HSMP, thats means if i get HSMP today .. i will be able to get ILR tomorrow?


No - under the immigration rules only periods of leave under paras 128 - 319 can be amalgamated with HSMP. TWES is para 116-121. ILR from TWES + HSMP or TWES + WP or TWES + any other leave will continue to be a concession outside the rules. You are almost there anyway so make your summer plans

--------------------

---audi alteram partem---

kim2004
Junior Member
Member # 6512
Posted February 23, 2004 06:58 PM
ok Thanks,,,

this is why i am still working overtime now,, to impress my boss.. and not get sacked last minute !!!! :-)

"dreaming of the moment when i neednt to do so.."

Joseph01
Member
Member # 7141
Posted February 23, 2004 07:03 PM
TVT/Kayalami
Thanks for the clarification about TWES. I mistakenly thought it fell under Work Permit.
Joseph

[ February 23, 2004: Message edited by: Joseph01 ]

VikB
Junior Member
Member # 7059
Posted February 23, 2004 09:07 PM
Hi Kayalami/Joseph/TVT,

I had asked this question earlier, but wasn't on HSMP then.. My situation:

01/03/2000 - 26/06/2001 - WP
27/06/2001 - 25/07/2002 - Dependent
26/07/2002 - 14/01/2004 - WP
15/01/2004 - to date - HSMP

Does this mean I can apply for ILR on 1st of Mar 2004?

Thanks,
VikB

Kayalami
Member
Member # 5984
Posted February 24, 2004 10:31 AM
If you were a dependent of a person in a category leading to settlement (CLS) then you qualify to apply for ILR in March which I calculate to be the 47th month. If your were not a dependent of a person in a CLS the Home Office will deem the time as such as having re-set your clock counter for ILR purposes back to zero. IMHO they would probably have considered the time as a dependent even if not to a person in a CLS under a concession but not so sure for the length of time = 13mths. However there is no harm in making an application anyway - the most you will lose is 250 GBP and the best well ILR

--------------------

---audi alteram partem---

Dip
Member
Member # 4428
Posted February 24, 2004 11:01 AM
Kaya/Joseph/TVT,

I had this doubt for some time now. Thanks for the clarification.

The particular info I was looking for is a Dependent of a WP holder for 2 years followed by HSMP for another 2 years leading to ILR. Watch this space in October 04 for any surprises


Vik B,

You could actually share your experience prior to that.

Rgds
Dip

[ February 24, 2004: Message edited by: Dip ]

ND
Junior Member
Member # 7557
Posted February 24, 2004 11:08 AM
Until now i thought a WP's dependent cannot add that period to HSMP or WP is he/she wishes to convert to them.I though the count will start from zero.But after readinn all yours msg's i am little confused.

So one can get ILR by combining both the periods right?

i.e WR/HSMP(dependant) + WP/HSMP = 4 years =ILR.

Thorsten von Thyssen
Member
Member # 4397
Posted February 24, 2004 01:41 PM
Another strange thing is that HSMP can be amalgamated with multiple entry WP - certainly a category that does not lead to settlement.

--------------------

-----------------------------------
...cut the bullshit please...

ND
Junior Member
Member # 7557
Posted February 24, 2004 01:44 PM
Until now i thought a WP's dependent cannot add that period to HSMP or WP is he/she wishes to convert to them.I though the count will start from zero.But after readinn all yours msg's i am little confused.

So one can get ILR by combining both the periods right?


i.e WR/HSMP(dependant) + WP/HSMP = 4 years =ILR.

Please Can anyone clarify this?

VikB
Junior Member
Member # 7059
Posted February 24, 2004 06:38 PM
Thanks for your clarification Kayalami. I was a Dependent of a person on WP (category 194-196), which falls within the paragraphs 128 - 319! So will definitely give it a try. I am just a bit concerned whether the Case officers at Croydon or any of the other offices would be aware of such amalgamation. But of course it is worth a try!
Kayalami
Member
Member # 5984
Posted February 24, 2004 06:46 PM
ND - Yes.

VikB - glad to be of help and best of luck..you can always take a print out of the rules with you although I am sure the HO is on top of this.

--------------------

---audi alteram partem---

ND
Junior Member
Member # 7557
Posted February 25, 2004 11:41 AM
Thanks Kalyamani ... I am on WP where as my husband is as dependant and we were thinking that he cannot count his stay as dependant.But after i saw the msg u posted its clear that even he has a chance to get ILR if he gets HSMP or WP later.
Simpleton
Junior Member
Member # 5809
Posted February 25, 2004 02:38 PM
@ND

I have the same case and the croydon team refused it saying that you clock is setback to zero.

My Case is 2yrs (WP) + 1.5 Yrs (Dependand) + 6Months (WP)

@Kayalami: Are you sure about that?

ND
Junior Member
Member # 7557
Posted February 25, 2004 02:46 PM
Hi Simpleton,

U said 2yrs(WP) + 1.5 Yrs(Dependant) + 6 months(WP)

Are u a dependant of WP Holder or HSMP Holder?

IF you are not then i think what they said is true.

Kayalami what do u say ?

Contact Us | workpermit.com | New discussion board

(c) workpermit.com 2001-2004