ELDELRLY DEPENDENT VISA ENQUIRY

Dear All,

One of my friend's (British citizen) parents applied for ILR (Elderly Dependent Parents) in JULY 2012 under old rules but refused by HO in Sep 2013. They were further refused by First tier Tribunal in October 2014 and now seeking to lodgen a further appeal to Upper Tribunal within given time frame. My only question is if they don't get success at end and have to go back to where they belong to then what would happen to their current Family visit visa valid from 2010 till 2020. Would their visit visa be curtailed or they could avail it coming years. Just to note that HO has never returned their passports after refusal but gave removal directions if they won't appeal.

Thank You in advance.

Dear All,
Any genuine comments on my earlier enquiry please.

Thanks in Advance.

The common wisdom is it will be curtailed.

Thank you for your reply, Wandrer.

Are you aware of any immigration rule justfying your comment ?

Thanks.

sainird wrote:Thank you for your reply, Wandrer.

Are you aware of any immigration rule justfying your comment ?

Thanks.

Now their intentions r to settle here not visit. So common sense always prevails.

Refusal of leave to enter in relation to a person in possession of an entry clearance
321. A person seeking leave to enter the United Kingdom who holds an entry clearance which was duly issued to him and is still current may be refused leave to enter only where the Immigration Officer is satisfied that:
(i) False representations were made or false documents or information were submitted (whether or not material to the application, and whether or not to the holder's knowledge), or material facts were not disclosed, in relation to the application for entry clearance; or in order to obtain documents from the Secretary of State or a third party required in support of the application.
(ii) a change of circumstances since it was issued has removed the basis of the holder's claim to admission, except where the change of circumstances amounts solely to the person becoming over age for entry in one of the categories contained in paragraphs 296-316 of these Rules since the issue of the entry clearance; or
(iii) on grounds which would have led to a refusal under paragraphs 320(2), 320(6), 320(18A), 320(18B) or 320(19) (except where this sub-paragraph applies in respect of an entry clearance issued under Appendix Armed Forces it is to be read as if for "paragraphs 320(2), 320(6), 320(18A), 320(18B) or 320(19)" it said "paragraph 8(a), (b), (c) or (g) and paragraph 9(d)")