ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe
Is there any benefit to email them ?Jbkhan32 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:23 amBoth of you Raheal007 and uk2715 send a email to PM house and draw the attantion of PM office in this matter.here is the link how to contact PM office
https://email.number10.gov.uk/contact.aspx
007RAHEEL wrote: ↑Sat Aug 26, 2017 11:53 pmIs there any benefit to email them ?Jbkhan32 wrote: ↑Mon Aug 21, 2017 12:23 amBoth of you Raheal007 and uk2715 send a email to PM house and draw the attantion of PM office in this matter.here is the link how to contact PM office
https://email.number10.gov.uk/contact.aspx
That statement seems odd. If you were an EEA national, would you be a 'qualified person'? However, the statement may be true. When you acquire permanent residence, you lose the retained right of residence!suzuki1985 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2017 12:46 pmYour application has been considered under regulation 15(1)(f) and regulation 21(5) of the immigration (EEA) regulations 2016.
We determined that you dont have a retained right of residence in the UK following divorce from your EEA or Swiss sponsor.
Have you omitted the word 'card' here? The statement would, alas, be true if 'permanent residence' were replaced by 'permanent residence card' and the EEA Regulations were the fundamental definition of the law. However, Directive 2004/38/EC is more fundamental, which would make the demand for the sponsor's ID beyond the lawful powers of the Home Office.suzuki1985 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2017 12:46 pmIn order to qualify for permanent residence under the EEA regulations, all applications must be accompanied by a sponsor`s EEA passport or national identity card.
And here the Home Office backs down from Regulation 21(5). The problem is how to provide evidence of what seems obvious, but isn't true in every case. Sometimes the sponsor can be persuaded to make the ID card or passport available to the Home Office. (It seems it doesn't have to be provided by the applicant.)suzuki1985 wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2017 12:46 pmYou have not provided either of these with your current application nor provided any evidence that this omission is due to circumstances beyond your control.
As I understand it, the passport doesn't actually have to be sent with the application. The ex could send it in to 'join the application'.
jay.ho wrote: ↑Mon Sep 04, 2017 12:36 amI just read this
Original documents and translations
Passports and ID documents must be originals.
Documents submitted to prove a retained right of residence must also be originals.
You cannot accept photocopies unless there are exceptional circumstances and the applicant gives valid reasons for not being able to provide the original document.
In such circumstances, you can accept a copy certified by the body or authority which issued the original or by a notary.
It's mean HO accept photo copies right ???
Richard W wrote: ↑Sun Sep 03, 2017 10:45 pmAs I understand it, the passport doesn't actually have to be sent with the application. The ex could send it in to 'join the application'.
Some divorced couples are in regular contact, e.g. because they have a child. Some members have had the assistance of their ex in making applications under the EEA regulations, e.g. in hunting for documentation of employment.
Nothing wrong if you re apply.suzuki1985 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2017 12:24 amHi,
Should I wait the answer from appeal? and/or should I re-apply in the meantime?
suzuki1985 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 05, 2017 9:54 pmHi,
I am divorced and holding retained right of residence. I have no connection with my ex and we ended bad. I cannot add any id because i have no connection. It is impossible. I did not add any my ex id for my retained right application as well.
