Ftt judge decision

We have hearing tomorrow on ftt but we see on gov websit that there is saying that we are on list j so i m confuse ?
I m worried that what is this

I spoke to mu solicitor he say is float list
So my quetion is if we are on float list will iffect my case or what is the reson that our hearing listed on float list anybody on form have situation like me ? If yes what ws the out come

Judge writ in the decion what is the meaning of this direction ?
I therefore conclude that the decision to refuse to grant the appellant indefinite leave to remain is not “necessary in a democratic society in the interest of national security,public sefety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime , for the protection of health or moral ,or the protection of the rights and freedom of others “ as Lord Bingham said in Razgar

Pls reply someone?

Judge writ in the decision what is the meaning of this direction ?
I therefore conclude that the decision to refuse to grant the appellant indefinite leave to remain is not “necessary in a democratic society in the interest of national security,public sefety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime , for the protection of health or moral ,or the protection of the rights and freedom of others “ as Lord Bingham said in Razgar
I apply for permanent leave to remain (if need any other information pls ask me i will give you )
Home office have to follow judge decision?

Posts merged.

Can you post as much as possible on what the judge wrote?

Thanks for reply vinny
Can i upload copy of judge decision ?

I want to attach copy of decision but how to attach? Pls help me to do
Thanks

vinny wrote: ↑

Mon Sep 10, 2018 3:06 am

Can you post as much as possible on what the judge wrote?

As Mr **** qc rightly submitted, appellant’s case is directly comparable ; and, had the respondent considered the family circumstances proparly ,he would have been bound to counclude that the appellate would have been entitled to British citizenship when she was child, if not before she was born. This is a relevant factor which the respondents did not consider fairly and properly .

I therefore conclude that the decision to refuse to grant the appellant indefinite leave to remain is not “necessary in a democratic society in the interest of national security,public sefety or the economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime , for the protection of health or moral ,or the protection of the rights and freedom of others “ as Lord Bingham said in Razgar

#home office not challenging ut (court fee refunded )
#can i get ILR as per judge direction ?

I writing as much i can if you still need more you can ask me
Waiting for reply from moderator