- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe
Obie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:30 pmYou could have sent evidence of treaty rights and provide proof of when PR was acquired as opposed to when the card was issued.
I have sent a reconsideration letter with all evidence in relation with my PR date.
When faced with a similar citizenship refusal in the past, a Pre Action protocol and a threat of JR resolved the matter for the subject.
Can you share more detail, is this case was refused on no 12mths PR requirement ground?
Just to clarify, Obie, is your suggestion for this evidence to have been submitted to the EEA applications team at the time of applying for the DCPR or to the naturalisation team at the time of applying for the naturalisation?
Given the fact that the OP would be eligible to apply for naturalisation in the normal course (1 year after the date of PR on the Home Office system) on 6th April anyway, is a PAP & threat of JR worth it in terms of cost? And would applying for a PAP and sending it, etc, not take up that much amount of time anyway? In other words, given the timeframe, is a PAP worth it?
But what if the OP submitted incorrect evidence (that of the latest years, for instance, rather than those of the earliest years)? Surely the Home Office caseworker can only go by the evidence submitted?
PAP - Pre Action Protocol - there is a fairly specific format for this.
Hi Obie, am awaiting EEA application team respond, meantime start prepping my NA reconsideration letter, just wondering are u providing legal advice in this matter?Obie wrote: ↑Thu Feb 28, 2019 12:30 pmYou could have sent evidence of treaty rights and provide proof of when PR was acquired as opposed to when the card was issued.
When faced with a similar citizenship refusal in the past, a Pre Action protocol and a threat of JR resolved the matter for the subject.