I am so happy that i did find this active forum and the people behind it to help other in need.
In 2016 i applied for my wife schengenvisa in the embassy of Netherlands in Pakistan. The visa was rejected on the grounds of that she was not going back to home country because she doesn't work and lives with parents and has nothing to show except 1 reason which we gave. Very understandable and then we did go in appeal but that was also rejected. Then we did appeal in court and the judge decided in our favour and so my wife did came for 90 days and did go back as per rules.
Bad luck
Now we want to apply again for 90 days before she can come permanently as i am struggling smalll time owner.
At that time we had an guarontor a friend but now we fullfill also the 34 euro a day criteria and will use the 34 euro a day criteria.
My main question is this. we have an verdict from the judge where the judge said why immigration is not considering us honest as our story looks like that and ordered them to take new decision within 6 weeks and null and void the old rejection.
So if we apply now again how much impact has the court verdict on that case and that she went back according to rules? We are much negative in sense of that we won't get it but i am also a fighter and doesn't want to give it up.
Can someone explain which value the court order has the first schengenvisa? We have the same grounds for why she would go back.
- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222