- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, Administrator
Have you involved the MP on this matter for help? The refusal was wrong as you have extra £600 to be added to the base salary if the basic salary has remain the same throughout the whole 6 months periods.Niknam H wrote: ↑Thu Sep 23, 2021 9:37 amThanks for replying.
Thats the point the £50 is paid EVERY month and is on every payslip, like so
Basic Salary 1512.50
Benefits Allowance 50.00
The ECO in his judgement preamble states:
“You state that your sponsor is employed by xxxxxx since 04/1/19 and earns an annual salary of £18750. As evidence of your sponsors employment, you have submitted an employment letter, payslips and bank statements”
Unfortunately, the ECO then goes on to 1) totally ignore this evidence 2) makes an error in grossing up the salary of the sponsor.
Nowhere in his judgement does the ECO explain why he has ignored the evidence and the £50 per month in his calculations.
The questions are: Is this an error? If we put in a fresh application, can another ECO do the same thing?
Incidentally, since the application the, the applicant's basic pay is above the threshold, but do we have to wait six months to submit?
I do agree Fresh application will be a good idea but make sure they explained to the caseworker how the requirement is met plus quoting the guidance.