ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Previous Job Redundancy -- Should This Be Mentioned

Family member & Ancestry immigration; don't post other immigration categories, please!
Marriage | Unmarried Partners | Fiancé | Ancestry

Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator

Locked
zs786
Newbie
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Sep 15, 2009 11:00 pm

Previous Job Redundancy -- Should This Be Mentioned

Post by zs786 » Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:19 pm

Hi,

Just a quick question, hope someone can advise

I am currently in full time employment and started at my current place on the 2nd of December 2009

I was made redundant at my previous employment and my last date was 30th of Sept 2009

I will be sponsoring my wife for a settlement visa and we are applying soon, my question is should i mention i was made redundant from my previous employer? i did not claim public funds during this period. I have a P45 and P60 from my previous employer along with a letter confirming the dates i worked, but nothing about being made redundant is mentioned. Is there any point of me mentioning this??

Many Thanks

andyb123
Member
Posts: 117
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:59 pm

Post by andyb123 » Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:37 pm

you don't need to provide proof of continuous employment, you just need to provide as much as you can in terms of payslips and bank satements to show that you have the finances to support yourself and your wife

I WOULD note in your covering letter that you don't have payslips for October and November BECAUSE you were made redundant - the fact that you have so quickly gained re-employment and that you didn't need to claim benefits in your time off will only count in your favour

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England
United Kingdom

Post by John » Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:51 pm

i did not claim public funds during this period.
But did you claim contribution-based JSA? If so, that is not within the definition of Public Funds.

But the general point, it would not have caused a problem even if you had claimed any Public Funds, to which you were entitled.
John

Locked