Quick update to my case. My day in court was on 20 Feb '20 and I won my appeal based on the fact that my initial spousal visa was made before 9 July 2012 and HO should not have placed me on a 10 or 5 year track but should have placed me under the old rules which was 2 years back then. My advise to o...
Need advice on what to do next. My initial post I have asked advise on my ILR that was declined by Home Office stating that I only have 2.5 years and need 5 years (60 months). My and my solicitor’s opinion was that I should have been on the 2-year route as we applied before the rules change 9 July ...
The 2012 Visa was refused by Home Office as they questioned my relationship with my partner (now my wife) I appealed and won the court case. The judge ruled in my favour and said Home Office did not follow the immigration rules and I won the appeal on immigration rules. I applied again for the spous...
Neither I or my Solicitor have ever changed the route I was on. Home Office did that themselves. Secondly I applied before 9 July 2012 and should have been on a 2 year route: https://www.gov.uk/uk-family-visa/partner-spouse When you can settle permanently The earliest you can apply to settle in the ...
Thanks for your feedback. This means if I am reading this right that there are different Spousal partner/unmarried partner applications routes but are there different application forms? Or is this for Home Office to decide what route you fall under? This is the guidance I find on government websites...
When I won my appeal it was under immigration rules and not humanitarian. Quote: Decision from judge(June 2014): The appeal is allowed under the immigration rules. When we only applied for the unmarried partner visa via my solicitor and I am not familiar with different requirements under FLR(M) or F...
I have a question regarding the Indefinite Leave to remain application via the Spousal visa. Background my first Spousal Visa was rejected by Home Office as they questioned whether I was in a legit relationship even though we had shown them all the proof they needed. The UK Tribunal court ruled in m...
