My views are aligned to yours. We will see, the Senior Presenting officer at the hearing indicated that provisions have been made to people affected , who would have succeeded. However within 2 weeks the individual was approached and asked to present himself for ETD. I consider in a very serious li...
No a fresh application will not matter as the Secretary of State may say they are not bound by it , as there was no jurisdiction. A finding of fact by the judge that he would have allowed the appeal but for Sala and jurisdiction would create a strong irrationality challenge in the event the HO reje...
Please desist from writing in capital letters. I am not sure if I can give more than I have already given. It is a shame in your case, that matter is at Ftt. Due to the fact that mine was at the Upper Tribunal with permission, I am able to appeal to the court of appeal. If my argument succeeds, it ...
Sala is an extremely.... strange..... decision. However, in practical terms, dealing with it: 1. Any FTT Judge / HOPO aware of it will raise it, meaning there is no jurisdiction. In my experience, and having asked in Chambers, this is happening almost all the time. So if there is an outstanding appe...
I'd agree, especially the long absence. The Home Office bears in mind (among lots of other things) whether you are making the UK your home and intend to in the future. That sort of absence falls outside the guidelines.
British nationality is not a matter which comes under EU law - the rights of EEA nationals in other member states include permanent residence after 5 years of exercising treaty rights, but there is no right to nationality.
All of those matters - turnout, threshold, whatever - needed to be argued about BEFORE the referendum. It's not great to start arguing about them afterwards.
The Act of Parliament passed by a country mile, the majority was huge.
After complaining about them discriminating my human right, they have finally started to make a move. The problem is that he is in another County in another City and therefore we have to give notice again. That means it will take 70 days again. He has got a removal date for the 29th of July. We are...
I think we're heading for enough evidence of swallowed lies and misunderstandings to dismiss the referendum as invalid. I think that would be absolutely wrong. It's impossible to say what people had in mind when they voted, but 1.3 million votes as a margin is a definite decision, if not an overwhe...
It has never been a problem, breaking down the different constituency of voters. No one has suggested, that all the people who voted leave are uneducated or lovey. However it is a fact that a significant majority are. That is a fact , when you look into facts. Don't be silly. That's not a "fact", t...
I earn a significant portion of my living from EU law too, as I'm a barrister who does immigration law. I don't, however, think that everyone should have considered my career before voting! I live in one of the areas with the highest percentage of "remain" voters, but I have family members in Kent w...
I have expressed a view. I said most of the people who voted, did so for facial motivated reason. The actions of these people affect the lives of many people in a fundamental manner. This is not a difference as reconcileable as someone voting for labour or conservatives. Yes the view are respected,...
On the subject of democracy, this referendum was not democratic. Foreign citizens from commonwealth countries were able to vote and with all certainty they have voted leave, while EU citizens who have been here for donkeys years were not allowed to vote. That's been the electoral law position for a...
