Post
by dazzle » Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:42 pm
Hello all.. could you give me some opinions on this situation please.
My wife was denied a UK spouse visa in 2009. After a lengthy 13 month appeal the refusal was overturned and the visa issued.
During the appeal process we laid down roots in another EU country and she now has an residence card for that country. We've been here for 8 months.
We do still want to move to the UK asap. However because of the length of the appeal, the job offer that I had during the initial UK visa application is no longer on offer. So I am waiting for a new UK job offer before we move, and I don't know how much longer this will take - vacancies for my profession are very few and far between.
The thing is, I believe that my wife will have to obtain FLR in the future because of the delay in making the move to the UK, in order to meet requirements for ILR, if we continue through the national immigration law route. So would it be better to go down the EU route under Surinder Singh instead?
What are the pros and cons of each route, in terms of costs, timescales, progression to British citizenship, and other hoops to jump through such as the Life in UK test?
Thanks!