ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Sunday Times story - civil partnerships of convenience?

General UK immigration & work permits; don't post job search or family related topics!

Please use this section of the board if there is no specific section for your query.

Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator

Locked
ppron747
inactive
Posts: 950
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 6:10 pm
Location: used to be London

Sunday Times story - civil partnerships of convenience?

Post by ppron747 » Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:17 am

The Sunday Times February 19, 2006 wrote:Migrants use gay marriage loophole
Robert Winnett, Ali Hussain and Claire Newell

LAWYERS are prepared to advise potential immigrants how to gain British citizenship by signing up for “gay marriages” even if they are heterosexual.

Undercover reporters were told by six different firms of solicitors how to exploit a loophole in the civil partnership rules to get passports.

Immigrants face less rigorous tests if they seek to gain British citizenship through a civil partnership than through a heterosexual marriage.

Under laws that took effect last December, gay people have the same immigration rights as married people — and may secure a full passport after two years in the country.

However, while marriages have to be consummated to qualify there is no such requirement on couples in a civil partnership. It is thus not illegal for two heterosexual friends to form a civil partnership and then to “divorce” after two years once the foreigner has gained British citizenship.

Last week register offices in London, Essex and Leeds recorded 27 foreigners out of a total of 217 people who had declared their intention to form a civil partnership. Six out of 14 recorded at Bristol involve a foreigner who could be eligible for British citizenship.

Several firms of immigration lawyers advertise their services in gay publications and some solicitors explain on their websites the immigration benefits of civil partnerships.....
The full story is here

Silly gaffe over the idea that "a full passport" can be gained after two years - I'm tempted to say that the UKPS only issue empty passports, but will resist it :) - interesting read, despite that
|| paul R.I.P, January, 2007
Want a 2nd opinion? One will be along shortly....

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England
United Kingdom

Post by John » Sun Feb 19, 2006 9:58 am

Paul, sounds as far fetched as the storylines in "Hotel Babylon" where the writers seem to have absolutely no idea that non-EEA citizens need the correct sort of visa, or a Certificate of Approval, to marry in the UK. And as for the illegal immigration story in last week's episode ...well :!: :!: :!:
John

Rogerio
Member
Posts: 249
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 11:30 pm

Post by Rogerio » Sun Feb 19, 2006 10:26 am

As a gay man, in a r/ship and not in a civil partnership, I can only roll my eyes and say "oh well!".

R

olisun
Diamond Member
Posts: 1079
Joined: Mon Oct 14, 2002 2:01 am

Post by olisun » Mon Feb 20, 2006 10:28 am

I wonder if the ministers actually bother to check for any possible loop holes before passing a bill in the parliment..

Are there any legal advisors dedicated to the parliment?

ppron747
inactive
Posts: 950
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2005 6:10 pm
Location: used to be London

Post by ppron747 » Mon Feb 20, 2006 11:27 am

I think you'll find, Olisun, that Acts of Parliament are written by lawyers, rather than by ministers.... It is also worth considering that the House of Lords is stuffed full of lawyers.

I am not aware of there being any more "loopholes" in the civil partnership legislation than there are in the law governing marriages. The point is that all law is open to being abused, no matter how carefully it may be drafted.

I suspect that there's a kernel of truth in the Sunday Times story - not least because they've named names, and risk having to pay out a lot of damages if they're misreporting their contacts with the lawyers concerned. But how could the law have been framed so as to avoid unscrupulous people from taking advantage of it?

I headed this thread "civil partnerships of convenience" deliberately, to echo the parallel with marriages of convenience. They happen, and it would be impossible to cut them out altogether.
|| paul R.I.P, January, 2007
Want a 2nd opinion? One will be along shortly....

Locked