ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

new trend by ukba

Use this section for any queries concerning the EU Settlement Scheme, for applicants holding pre-settled and settled status.

Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe

Locked
jamoman
Newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 7:06 pm

new trend by ukba

Post by jamoman » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:34 pm

http://www.gherson.com/blog/a-step-in-t ... -required/

Recently we have started to see a worrying trend in withdrawals of the UKBA decision days or minutes prior to the hearing. We have been told that the Home Office Presenting Officer’s unit that represents the UK Border Agency at appeals has a new policy that, where they consider the refusal to be indefensible, they withdraw the decision and refer the matter back to the British Embassy or UK Border Agency to reconsider the decision. However, they can only make recommendations. They cannot compel the British Embassy or UK Border Agency to approve the application or dictate a timeframe within which they must make a decision.



So, on the one hand, this can be viewed as welcome news but the actual effect can still be very damaging on appellants.



In many cases the appellants have waited months to have their day in court. To find out shortly before the hearing that the matter will now go back to the embassy or UK Border Agency to reconsider the matter, with no assurance that they will approve it or that the reconsideration will take place within any set time frame, is unfair to say the least. The embassy or UK Border Agency are not obliged to follow the Home Office Presenting Officer’s requests and if they refuse again a whole new appeal process begins, causing further delays.



A system of withdrawing flawed refusals is welcome but some regulation must be imposed to ensure that the system works quickly and fairly and is not an abuse of process.

ravii
Member
Posts: 210
Joined: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:57 pm
Location: Dorset

Post by ravii » Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:47 pm

In most of the cases ukba turn down their decisions at the time of pre action protocol notice,but some time if the appellant produce more evidences before the court which are enough to satisfy the court then mostly ukba representers withdraw the decisions before court turn down ukba with cost.
Best regards

joanna2012
Newly Registered
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 5:21 pm

Post by joanna2012 » Wed Feb 20, 2013 7:07 am

I think in such cases UKBA should still be bound by the six month rule as after withdrawal of their decision one can argue that no decision has effectively been issued. It cannot be that the UKBA issues flawed decisions just to be within the six month rule and then withdraw such decisions as they wish at the court hearing.

Locked
cron