- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe
Ahhh ok, sorry. I wasn't getting what you meant... The UK does accept the "bare" US documents... Yeah I know it is strange, considering he has used it a number of times to fly inside and outside of the USA... I don't know how long they are valid for, my husband told me just today that his doesn't expire until 2017...86ti wrote:That's not what I was asking for. The marriage document may need an Apostille unless the UK accepts "bare" US documents. It is strange that the US passport was not accepted. How long is such a passport valid for (10 years)?
EDIT: It may be useful to provide us with the exact wording of the refusal.
Ok I have the letter..86ti wrote:In any case the first action would be to contact the entry clearance manager and ask that person to review the case.
I suppose the rest of the letter is a standard blurb with a denial under section 12? And there is no info why the documents would not be valid or any indication that the ECO has actually looked at those documents?Missy11 wrote:Ok I have the letter..86ti wrote:In any case the first action would be to contact the entry clearance manager and ask that person to review the case.
Current guidance states that non-EEA national direct family members must
Hold a valid passport
Have evidence that they are related as claimed e.g an original marriage certificate
Yes it is just standard blurb... No nothing at all to explain how or why and nothing stating that the ECO actually looked at the documents... In fact it doesn't even say who the ECO is!!86ti wrote:I suppose the rest of the letter is a standard blurb with a denial under section 12? And there is no info why the documents would not be valid or any indication that the ECO has actually looked at those documents?
You can try to get more info by telephone. If that doesn't work you can either try to apply again or if you think that that would yield in the same answer get in touch with the ECM.
Thinking "positively", maybe somebody there just totally screwed up.Missy11 wrote:Yes it is just standard blurb... No nothing at all to explain how or why and nothing stating that the ECO actually looked at the documents...
I guess that's just for protection.Missy11 wrote:In fact it doesn't even say who the ECO is!!