UK tribunal sides with HSMP visa holder

An appeal by a gentleman who was served a deportation order by the British government has been upheld. His application for extension under the Highly Skilled Migrant Programme (HSMP) was rejected by the government after changes to the program were applied retrospectively. The gentlemen then challenged the order under human rights laws.

The Highly Skilled Migrant Programme allows highly skilled, foreign-born professionals to live and work in the United Kingdom if they successfully qualify under a points-based system. Usually referred to as an HSMP visa, it has become very popular since its introduction in 2002. The program has undergone a number changes over the years.

On 07 November 2006, the program was temporarily suspended while a major overhaul was implemented. On 05 December it was reopened under new rules, and the changes were applied retrospectively ... those who successfully came to the UK under the previous HSMP criteria must qualify under the new criteria if they wish to obtain an extension to their HSMP visa.

George Joseph, and Indian national who holds a PhD in chemistry, arrived in Britain under earlier HSMP rules. He sold his home and left his job in India to relocate to the UK. After the changes to the HSMP program were enacted, Joseph was unable to qualify for an HSMP extension and he challenged his notice to leave the UK before the Hatton Cross Tribunal.

Upon his arrival in the UK, Joseph was presented with "guidance notes" which stated he could expect a route to settlement under the HSMP scheme and that revisions to HSMP would not affect his application. As long as he was economically active, or had taken all reasonable steps to become so, he could expect his HSMP visa to be renewed. The court agreed with him.

"This case is in fact stronger than any 'legitimate expectation' cases, as here the appellant changed his position to his detriment as a result of what he was told," said Judge Digney of the tribunal court.

"There is no overriding public interest that demands here the treatment to which the appellant was subjected ... I conclude that the decision of the respondent is therefore not in accordance with the law."

Up to an estimated 16,000 people who were granted HSMP visas under the old rules may be affected by the retrospective application of the new rules. Those who cannot qualify under the new HSMP rules, or qualify under other immigration categories, face deportation when their visas expire.

The tribunal courts decision is a major victory that may offer relief to many people caught up in the changes.

.

Generally, for liability reasons, ANY article from ANY source that is posted to this forum needs to be sourced.

This is to comply with fair and appropriate use regulations & laws related to copyright and intellectual property rights.

Especially when you use one of our own articles, we REALLY like it when you give us credit.

The proper way is to :

1) include the URL where the article is found

2) include the copyright notice for the organization that owns the content of the article.

3) include the full article (including title) OR ... if you should post only part of the article ... make sure to clearly note where deletions or your own added commentary occurs.


For an example of how I follow these rules when I post articles :

http://www.workpermit.com/news/2007-05- ... plaint.htm

UK tribunal sides with HSMP visa holder denied extension under new rules

An appeal by a gentleman who was served a deportation order by the British government has been upheld. His application for extension under the Highly Skilled Migrant Programme (HSMP) was rejected by the government after changes to the program were applied retrospectively. The gentlemen then challenged the order under human rights laws.

[ ... ]

George Joseph, and Indian national who holds a PhD in chemistry, arrived in Britain under earlier HSMP rules. He sold his home and left his job in India to relocate to the UK. After the changes to the HSMP program were enacted, Joseph was unable to qualify for an HSMP extension and he challenged his notice to leave the UK before the Hatton Cross Tribunal.

Upon his arrival in the UK, Joseph was presented with "guidance notes" which stated he could expect a route to settlement under the HSMP scheme and that revisions to HSMP would not affect his application. As long as he was economically active, or had taken all reasonable steps to become so, he could expect his HSMP visa to be renewed. The court agreed with him.

"This case is in fact stronger than any 'legitimate expectation' cases, as here the appellant changed his position to his detriment as a result of what he was told," said Judge Digney of the tribunal court.

"There is no overriding public interest that demands here the treatment to which the appellant was subjected ... I conclude that the decision of the respondent is therefore not in accordance with the law."

[ NOTE : His deportation is considered to be against his human rights in the UK; the ruling does not say that the retrospective application of the new HSMP rules is illegal or improper. ]

Up to an estimated 16,000 people who were granted HSMP visas under the old rules may be affected by the retrospective application of the new rules. Those who cannot qualify under the new HSMP rules, or qualify under other immigration categories, face deportation when their visas expire.

The tribunal courts decision is a major victory that may offer relief to many people caught up in the changes.

----
Copyright© 2007 SIA workpermit.com - All rights reserved.

Placing the entire article inside of a quote really helps; the author of the article cannot claim there is some attempt at plagiarism.

We are rather happy you noticed our article and quite happy for you to reproduce it ... here or anywhere ... BUT please do give proper notice of the source.

If you post our article somewhere else, we especially would like credit.

And, if you post someone else's article here, we expect to give the same professional courtesy in return.

This forum is run by a commercial company, so posting entire articles as ''fair use'' is a little bit dodgy. We will tolerate it here unless/until we receive too many complaints. It helps us a lot if you delete out some unimportant content and add some of your own commentary ... that makes it MUCH easier to defend as ''fair use.''

If a news organization or one of our competitors complains, we may have to delete the post. If we get many / serious complaints, we may not be able to allow posting articles.

I personally want members to post articles and links to immigration news .. it helps me to do my job.

Following these guidelines will help very much in allowing us to permit this type of activity.

THANK YOU !!

The Admin