Anontier20 wrote: ↑
Wed Apr 01, 2020 11:05 pm
Not looking for loopholes, just occurred to me as a bit of a counter productive guidelines, as in one part they don't need to see the investment documentation again, therein won't know if I've spent £50k, £75k or £200k as they don't ask for this, so one could join/ take over several businesses outside of the original investment, but then don't have to actually create a net increase in jobs so to speak because their initial company has shown it had the jobs in place
. Anyway what will be will be. I am going to go with what you suggested, Company A to show the £50k investment and Company B for my jobs.
Not sure if there is something counter productive. Not fully defined in some places, yes.
You are only required to provide evidence that meets the minimum requirements set out.
So, once the extension has been granted (investment shown), any additional investment, business, etc. is up to you. HO does not need to know about it and there is no need to provide those documentation.
Similarly, if you have the same jobs continuing in the first company, whatever jobs you create elsewhere does not matter. Again, there is no need to report those to HO or provide any documentation for that.
Based on your queries, I have assumed you did not have 2 jobs in the original company and needed to use job(s) from the 2nd company. And where the 2nd company is one you have joined, you need to show NET increase in jobs.
But this post seems to indicate that " ..initial company has shown it had the jobs in place.." If that is the case, the whole discussion on your second company was irrelevant.
My comments are in no way meant to be advisory. I have no professional knowledge of immigration. These are based on my own experience, convictions and personal interpretation of publicly available information.