ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

PSW on ACCA Fundamental Papers

Archived UK Tier 1 (Post-Study Work) points system forum. This route no longer exists.

Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe

Locked
malik5805
BANNED
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:38 pm

Post by malik5805 » Mon Oct 01, 2012 4:10 pm

Hi yah guys we need also and if anyone hve those information then plz forward me aswell thanks kingheart1122@yahoo.com

amran
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:41 pm

Post by amran » Wed Oct 03, 2012 11:43 pm

friends Did you get your reply from home office, any positive decision or still waiting.... I am awaiting .. my friends going for appeal.
any advice where to get some support for appeal. need to mentally prepare

malik5805
BANNED
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:38 pm

Post by malik5805 » Thu Oct 04, 2012 9:34 am

amran wrote:friends Did you get your reply from home office, any positive decision or still waiting.... I am awaiting .. my friends going for appeal.
any advice where to get some support for appeal. need to mentally prepare
i received my gift from HO last week

rv
Newly Registered
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:37 pm

Post by rv » Thu Oct 04, 2012 12:03 pm

Hello everyone,

I got my rejection last week and visa is due to expire next week therefore i didn't get right of appeal.
Do you think that i should go for higher tribunal. I haven't seen anyone getting visa in higher tribunal and it is too expensive.

Regards
RV

malik5805
BANNED
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 10:38 pm

Post by malik5805 » Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:18 pm

rv wrote:Hello everyone,

I got my rejection last week and visa is due to expire next week therefore i didn't get right of appeal.
Do you think that i should go for higher tribunal. I haven't seen anyone getting visa in higher tribunal and it is too expensive.

Regards
RV
i heared from
someone but not seen anyone personally but ppl saying that if anyone go for judicial review HO try to do outside court settlement and issue visas and i think
you shud go for Review::

rv
Newly Registered
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:37 pm

Post by rv » Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:42 pm

malik5805 wrote:
rv wrote:Hello everyone,

I got my rejection last week and visa is due to expire next week therefore i didn't get right of appeal.
Do you think that i should go for higher tribunal. I haven't seen anyone getting visa in higher tribunal and it is too expensive.

Regards
RV
i heared from
someone but not seen anyone personally but ppl saying that if anyone go for judicial review HO try to do outside court settlement and issue visas and i think
you shud go for Review::

I know someone who got rejection in judicial review and he appealed again and then court said that it will be oral hearing.

What i know in oral hearing is that judge and both sides solicitor will argue and this will not consider in as a high court case. he is waiting for oral hearing now.

Big thing is that he is waiting from last one year and i think it will take another 6 months at least and too much money.

That's why i am just waiting for their responses from court and UKBA but i would really appreciate if someone shares their case with me(judicial review or out of court settlement case) so that i can go for judicial review.

Regards
RV

rv
Newly Registered
Posts: 17
Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:37 pm

Post by rv » Thu Oct 04, 2012 1:43 pm

my email id is arvindwadhwa@gmail.com

smylinggalaxi
BANNED
Posts: 2
Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:47 pm

Post by smylinggalaxi » Fri Oct 05, 2012 7:54 pm

Hello Guys I been following this forum since long time ago...But last week all my friends and i got decision from home office...
Anywz we guys also have filed our appeals this week...
Mr Marfat going to represents our cases we know some more people whoz won appeals wholly basis on the ACCA fundamental Level and Marfat represents thier cases very well...

All of you whoz got thier decision back from home office dontworry and keep faith on God and all of us inshalla we will get Visas evantually but make sure get the good represntative and pray for everyone..

Will keep you update when will be my hearing date..

amran
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:41 pm

Post by amran » Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:40 pm

DO anybody knows any lawyer to represent cases on no-win-no fee basis. money is matter because some lawyer asking fees in advance but their knowledge is less them this forum's member. we will pay fees but looking for little bit certainty that we will get psw at the end of the road.

please some advice people for shake of humanity and future inconveniences.

NAHID
Junior Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:26 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by NAHID » Sat Oct 06, 2012 2:15 pm

try your friends lawyer or others, call them and ask if they are interested to help in your circumstances. however no-win -no fee cases lawyers usually ask for some admin fees. and at the end if you win you may have to more than normal fees. think carefully and call some lawyers if you dont find anybody try the number i posted earlier.

good luck in your lawyer search and application matter.

Noman83
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:10 pm

Post by Noman83 » Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:09 pm

amran wrote:DO anybody knows any lawyer to represent cases on no-win-no fee basis. money is matter because some lawyer asking fees in advance but their knowledge is less them this forum's member. we will pay fees but looking for little bit certainty that we will get psw at the end of the road.

please some advice people for shake of humanity and future inconveniences.
http://www.duncanlewis.co.uk/immigratio ... 09%29.html

amran
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:41 pm

Post by amran » Tue Oct 09, 2012 10:05 am

noman83

thank you for your kind support. unfortunately that information is out of date becasue it was 2009, there after policy change and rules also change in 2010 and last year many student went on appeal at upper tribunal . Gure Greene, and other member provided many link of cases, I did not see any case represented was allowed in upper tribunal.

this time they are refusing cases on Appendix A and B not on policy guidance. it seems much tough than before. one things surprise me that the link you attached they did not update their information since 2009 does it means that no other cases were able to get positive decision.

I do not wish to judge any body just sharing my personal opinion. im still waiting for my reply from ukba.

Are they willing to get cases no win -no fee basis , psw fundamental level ?

Noman83
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:10 pm

Post by Noman83 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:03 am

amran wrote:noman83

thank you for your kind support. unfortunately that information is out of date becasue it was 2009, there after policy change and rules also change in 2010 and last year many student went on appeal at upper tribunal . Gure Greene, and other member provided many link of cases, I did not see any case represented was allowed in upper tribunal.

this time they are refusing cases on Appendix A and B not on policy guidance. it seems much tough than before. one things surprise me that the link you attached they did not update their information since 2009 does it means that no other cases were able to get positive decision.

I do not wish to judge any body just sharing my personal opinion. im still waiting for my reply from ukba.



Are they willing to get cases no win -no fee basis , psw fundamental level ?
I know these are previous cases but the only thing u need is either a good lawyer or a good representation . They are not relying on Policy Guidance refusals as they have been told by supreme court judges in ALVI JUDGEMENT . My whole point of sharing this appeal over here was to give you good points on which you can defend yourself in the court for eg UKBA and my other respected freinds have been saying this on and on that ACCA is not a recognised body but yesterday i went on to study whole ACCA constitution where it said it was recognised as a qualifiying body in 1993 so if somebody dont know about something it does not mean it did not exist .

This point of recognition is also mentioned in this appeal :

Decision :

The Tribunal stated that the new and old guidance ( pre 31st March 2009) seemed to mirror each other and the main concern was “professional and vocational” qualifications being considered in the same category.

The Tribunal considered the issue of whether professional and vocational qualifications were different in nature and concluded that vocational courses especially at NVQ level involve little academic study whereas the Appellant according to ACCA literature had achieved a level of Bachelors when he passed his Part Two exams and then onto the equivalent of a Master’s degree when he completed his Professional qualification.

The Tribunal found that the literature and further documentation from the ACCA body was authoritative evidence concerning the equivalency of the course studied by the Appellant. The Tribunal held that in light of this evidence the Appellant had obtained a qualification which was equivalent to a Master’s degree level. As the ACCA was recognised as a qualifying body in 1993 and the Appellant had obtained the qualification at a recognised institution, the Tribunal was satisfied that the Appellant was entitled to a grant of further leave as a Tier 1 (Post – Study Work) Migrant and the appeal was allowed.

And for equivalency level obiviously judges had to take in coinsideration documents provided by ACCA on thier equivalency . In short it depends on you and your lawyer how well they have prepared for the case . Outcome could be you loose or you win but take decision yourself dont rely on my or somebody else interpretation .

quantum1
Member of Standing
Posts: 304
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:31 pm

Post by quantum1 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 11:56 am

Noman83 wrote:
amran wrote:noman83

thank you for your kind support. unfortunately that information is out of date becasue it was 2009, there after policy change and rules also change in 2010 and last year many student went on appeal at upper tribunal . Gure Greene, and other member provided many link of cases, I did not see any case represented was allowed in upper tribunal.

this time they are refusing cases on Appendix A and B not on policy guidance. it seems much tough than before. one things surprise me that the link you attached they did not update their information since 2009 does it means that no other cases were able to get positive decision.

I do not wish to judge any body just sharing my personal opinion. im still waiting for my reply from ukba.



Are they willing to get cases no win -no fee basis , psw fundamental level ?
I know these are previous cases but the only thing u need is either a good lawyer or a good representation . They are not relying on Policy Guidance refusals as they have been told by supreme court judges in ALVI JUDGEMENT . My whole point of sharing this appeal over here was to give you good points on which you can defend yourself in the court for eg UKBA and my other respected freinds have been saying this on and on that ACCA is not a recognised body but yesterday i went on to study whole ACCA constitution where it said it was recognised as a qualifiying body in 1993 so if somebody dont know about something it does not mean it did not exist .

This point of recognition is also mentioned in this appeal :

Decision :

The Tribunal stated that the new and old guidance ( pre 31st March 2009) seemed to mirror each other and the main concern was “professional and vocational” qualifications being considered in the same category.

The Tribunal considered the issue of whether professional and vocational qualifications were different in nature and concluded that vocational courses especially at NVQ level involve little academic study whereas the Appellant according to ACCA literature had achieved a level of Bachelors when he passed his Part Two exams and then onto the equivalent of a Master’s degree when he completed his Professional qualification.

The Tribunal found that the literature and further documentation from the ACCA body was authoritative evidence concerning the equivalency of the course studied by the Appellant. The Tribunal held that in light of this evidence the Appellant had obtained a qualification which was equivalent to a Master’s degree level. As the ACCA was recognised as a qualifying body in 1993 and the Appellant had obtained the qualification at a recognised institution, the Tribunal was satisfied that the Appellant was entitled to a grant of further leave as a Tier 1 (Post – Study Work) Migrant and the appeal was allowed.

And for equivalency level obiviously judges had to take in coinsideration documents provided by ACCA on thier equivalency . In short it depends on you and your lawyer how well they have prepared for the case . Outcome could be you loose or you win but take decision yourself dont rely on my or somebody else interpretation .
Operational word here is equivalent. Old rules allowed equivalent qualification. Recent rules required strict qualification.

Noman83
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:10 pm

Post by Noman83 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:01 pm

quantum1 wrote:
Noman83 wrote:
amran wrote:noman83

thank you for your kind support. unfortunately that information is out of date becasue it was 2009, there after policy change and rules also change in 2010 and last year many student went on appeal at upper tribunal . Gure Greene, and other member provided many link of cases, I did not see any case represented was allowed in upper tribunal.

this time they are refusing cases on Appendix A and B not on policy guidance. it seems much tough than before. one things surprise me that the link you attached they did not update their information since 2009 does it means that no other cases were able to get positive decision.

I do not wish to judge any body just sharing my personal opinion. im still waiting for my reply from ukba.



Are they willing to get cases no win -no fee basis , psw fundamental level ?
I know these are previous cases but the only thing u need is either a good lawyer or a good representation . They are not relying on Policy Guidance refusals as they have been told by supreme court judges in ALVI JUDGEMENT . My whole point of sharing this appeal over here was to give you good points on which you can defend yourself in the court for eg UKBA and my other respected freinds have been saying this on and on that ACCA is not a recognised body but yesterday i went on to study whole ACCA constitution where it said it was recognised as a qualifiying body in 1993 so if somebody dont know about something it does not mean it did not exist .

This point of recognition is also mentioned in this appeal :

Decision :

The Tribunal stated that the new and old guidance ( pre 31st March 2009) seemed to mirror each other and the main concern was “professional and vocational” qualifications being considered in the same category.

The Tribunal considered the issue of whether professional and vocational qualifications were different in nature and concluded that vocational courses especially at NVQ level involve little academic study whereas the Appellant according to ACCA literature had achieved a level of Bachelors when he passed his Part Two exams and then onto the equivalent of a Master’s degree when he completed his Professional qualification.

The Tribunal found that the literature and further documentation from the ACCA body was authoritative evidence concerning the equivalency of the course studied by the Appellant. The Tribunal held that in light of this evidence the Appellant had obtained a qualification which was equivalent to a Master’s degree level. As the ACCA was recognised as a qualifying body in 1993 and the Appellant had obtained the qualification at a recognised institution, the Tribunal was satisfied that the Appellant was entitled to a grant of further leave as a Tier 1 (Post – Study Work) Migrant and the appeal was allowed.

And for equivalency level obiviously judges had to take in coinsideration documents provided by ACCA on thier equivalency . In short it depends on you and your lawyer how well they have prepared for the case . Outcome could be you loose or you win but take decision yourself dont rely on my or somebody else interpretation .
Operational word here is equivalent. Old rules allowed equivalent qualification. Recent rules required strict qualification.
Thanks but then what does level means as it says in the appendix we are refering to ? One intresting piece of information my freind has been offered admission in MBA PROGRAM by 2 reputed uni on sole basis of ACCA FUNDAMENTALS ??? what explanation do we have for this ???

amran
Newly Registered
Posts: 7
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 8:41 pm

Post by amran » Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:52 pm

that is the problem, Employer, specially University accept but Home Office do not accept.
Appendix A did not said anything about level for PSW matter.

Noman83
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:10 pm

Post by Noman83 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 1:55 pm

amran wrote:that is the problem, Employer, specially University accept but Home Office do not accept.
Appendix A did not said anything about level for PSW matter.
I have got my refusal in which it is stated as bachelor or PHD level so now they will face the music on thier mistakes

NAHID
Junior Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:26 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by NAHID » Tue Oct 09, 2012 5:31 pm

Noman83

it will depend on tribunal, what they will decide based on refusal. do you have evidence to met the Appendix A requirements except UKNARIC.

Noman83
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:10 pm

Post by Noman83 » Tue Oct 09, 2012 5:35 pm

NAHID wrote:Noman83

it will depend on tribunal, what they will decide based on refusal. do you have evidence to met the Appendix A requirements except UKNARIC.
Yes i have all the paperwork uk naric Acca letters etc and am going for JR not appeal so have a v good Barrister as well who is a family freind as well

msaini
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 9:02 am
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

PSW for CIMA

Post by msaini » Wed Oct 10, 2012 7:00 pm

Dear all,

I too have been following this thread for long time since I applied my PSW visa in March 2012 on basis of CIMA. I attached letter from UK Naric and Kaplan Financial to support my PSW visa. Recently my visa got rejected saying that CIMA is not a recognised qualification and it is immaterial if it comparable to UK Masters degree standard. I wasnt given right to appeal as my visa expires in Nov 2012.


Now I consulted a barrister who said that I need to find someone who got psw visa on basis of ACCA so that we can fight for our case in upper tribunal/high court on ground of equality or something like that. I do have a friend who was awarded psw on basis of ACCA some time ago. Has someone recently got psw on basis of ACCA? I need to know your views about how to get on.

affiliate
Newbie
Posts: 44
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:11 pm

Post by affiliate » Fri Oct 12, 2012 5:07 pm

Guys, is the story same for affiliates?
I qualified in Dec applied in April, done biometrics in June, no news yet.
Am I going to get a refusal?

NAHID
Junior Member
Posts: 54
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:26 pm
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by NAHID » Sat Oct 20, 2012 3:28 pm

Anybody get hearing date.................

PSWUKBA
Newly Registered
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 10:59 am

Post by PSWUKBA » Sun Oct 21, 2012 11:03 am

NAHID wrote:Anybody get hearing date.................
Yes I have hearing date

hisham786
Newly Registered
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:26 pm

Post by hisham786 » Tue Oct 23, 2012 10:33 pm

Its a long shot..but I have heard rumours that PSW was granted for ACCA in High Court judicial review. Not hearing but judicial review.

Is it possible for anyone to check it up with their lawyers and barrister.

Also anyone appealing in Upper Tribunal please contact me as I am in the same boat

Noman83
Member
Posts: 118
Joined: Sat Feb 18, 2012 7:10 pm

Post by Noman83 » Tue Oct 23, 2012 11:01 pm

hisham786 wrote:Its a long shot..but I have heard rumours that PSW was granted for ACCA in High Court judicial review. Not hearing but judicial review.

Is it possible for anyone to check it up with their lawyers and barrister.

Also anyone appealing in Upper Tribunal please contact me as I am in the same boat

where did you hear that somebody won in JR??

Locked
cron