I know but what can we do except cursing Zane Malik who messed up all of us..vishwen wrote:Brother it's not time to make jokes, but you make me laugh tho.
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Hi Vishvishwen wrote:Dear all, I received a letter from HM COURTS & TRIBUNAL SERVICE that the ukba have requested another 35 days to file their ground of defence,and the permission been granted ,till 17 July. After that, a hearing date will be fixed. The ukba doesn't have anything to prove , they are just waiting time, I got all the evidence regarding students been awarded after 5 April 2012 and just recently some got visa. I'm using all these evidence in court. I'm ready for them.
Well you are right but when Home office sent consent order first time my solicitor refused to sign it but then they again sent the consent order and my solicitor explained to me that even if I don't sign it they gonna put me under the khatel category.vishwen wrote:Challenge you are wring, our case is my identical because you sign the consent order and you been placed on hold, and whatever the outcome of khatel case will have an impact on your case. But me I didn't sign at all, because I don't follow TSOL instruction, that's why my JR keep progressing to the next stage.
vishwen wrote:Brother, my case it's not like yours, because I didn't get right of appeal and I'm on JUDICIAL REVIEW PROCESS. My hearing is coming after 17 july. I will keep u update. I didn't rely on khatel case coz I didn't signed the consent oder sent by TSOL.
thanks vishwen any new frm khatel they r goin to sc r not thanks.vishwen wrote:Dear sherarain, this will not affect you because your case is in upper tribunal, while our case is in the high court for judicial review process. TSOL mean treasury solicitor the ukba solicitor.and concern the consent order, is kind of a letter Sent by TSOL to all students who in Jr to sign, so that they will put a hold on the case, till the outcome of khatel case. Let me knw if you need more clarification
but i check the court fee is just £1000 hw does it come £5600 an there some other barrister who charge less fee thn zane malikvishwen wrote:Brother we don't know yet, because khatel is asking money with all the students to pay court fees which is £ 5600 and Zane Malik fees £7500. We don't know yet, I will keep you update.
slam brother can u explain in simple words thanksazizch wrote:Some one put in Zane Malik FB page.... might be useful if anyone has some knowledge....
"@MalikZane Hy Rule 34g can be over come by using sec 85(5) and 85A(4)(d) in strict sense by using as these are specially in wording of 'is adduced'. Moreover CO decision in calculating points of table 10, if u read as whole according to judment, does not seems accurate because points of degree has been awarded at the time of decision on the reliance of evidance submitted after making application but HO didnt award the points of qualification, which comes before degree.34g has not been used since 2008 in these cases but at the revokation of route does not make sense under fairness of policy triggered by pankina. If it is on the discretion of sectry of state then the basic aim of sec 85(5) is pointless. These are my findings to help u and powers of Surinder Singh route is always in question under common law.