- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, Administrator
He has had couple of GP consultations and they have all been free . Also you can check here .Casa wrote:He must pay for all NHS treatment, including GP consultation and medication. Failure to do so will further complicate his outstanding application. Were you advised to apply under FLR(O)? I would have thought that FLR(FP) would be more applicable. Are you earning at least £18,600 per annum?
Would he still be considered as a overstayer if he applied for flr(o) before his visa expired and the case is still with the home office?Casa wrote:You've misunderstood the CAB information. Your husband isn't here legally as your spouse as he entered as a visitor, for which he would require private medical insurance. He is now an overstayer as there is no concession for a visitor to switch to any other category from within the UK. I believe you've been poorly advised to apply under FLR(0). Apart from other issues, FLR(O) would require a sponsor's annual salary of £18,600, whereas FLR(FP) as the family/parent route doesn't.
Back to NHS treatment. Even straightforward visa applications are now being refused due to the use of the NHS when there is no entitlement.
You've been waiting 2 years for a decision on an application that I believe would be considered invalid. Have youfollowed up the status of the application with the Home Office or received any correspondence from them? It's essential that he uses his private medical insurance for any treatment.Ray111 wrote:Would he still be considered as a overstayer if he applied for flr(o) before his visa expired and the case is still with the home office?Casa wrote:You've misunderstood the CAB information. Your husband isn't here legally as your spouse as he entered as a visitor, for which he would require private medical insurance. He is now an overstayer as there is no concession for a visitor to switch to any other category from within the UK. I believe you've been poorly advised to apply under FLR(0). Apart from other issues, FLR(O) would require a sponsor's annual salary of £18,600, whereas FLR(FP) as the family/parent route doesn't.
Back to NHS treatment. Even straightforward visa applications are now being refused due to the use of the NHS when there is no entitlement.
He does have private medical insurance aswell from Vitality . thanks for this advice.
No i dont earn 18k.
+1Casa wrote:You've been waiting 2 years for a decision on an application that I believe would be considered invalid. Have youfollowed up the status of the application with the Home Office or received any correspondence from them? It's essential that he uses his private medical insurance for any treatment.Ray111 wrote:Would he still be considered as a overstayer if he applied for flr(o) before his visa expired and the case is still with the home office?Casa wrote:You've misunderstood the CAB information. Your husband isn't here legally as your spouse as he entered as a visitor, for which he would require private medical insurance. He is now an overstayer as there is no concession for a visitor to switch to any other category from within the UK. I believe you've been poorly advised to apply under FLR(0). Apart from other issues, FLR(O) would require a sponsor's annual salary of £18,600, whereas FLR(FP) as the family/parent route doesn't.
Back to NHS treatment. Even straightforward visa applications are now being refused due to the use of the NHS when there is no entitlement.
He does have private medical insurance aswell from Vitality . thanks for this advice.
No i dont earn 18k.
My father is supporting me financially . the last we heard was 8 months ago when the case was initially rejected and we appealed . we are waiting for a court date to be more specific.Casa wrote:As a further thought, if you aren't employed at the moment how are you supporting yourselves financially?
Which paragraph they are refused under? I could not find examples on the forum - would you mind sharing some?Casa wrote: Back to NHS treatment. Even straightforward visa applications are now being refused due to the use of the NHS when there is no entitlement.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... ndix_7.pdfPoleCat wrote:Which paragraph they are refused under? I could not find examples on the forum - would you mind sharing some?Casa wrote: Back to NHS treatment. Even straightforward visa applications are now being refused due to the use of the NHS when there is no entitlement.
I am obviously curious, being in a similar boat.
Thank you. If you heard about a case similar to ours (no invoice issued; after multiple enguiries an NHS official has stated in writing that no payment is due), would you be so kind as to share it in my thread?Casa wrote:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... ndix_7.pdf
"You should be aware that under immigration rules 320, 321, 321A and 322, a person with outstanding debts of over £1,000 for NHS treatment that are not paid within three months of invoicing, may be denied a further immigration application to enter or remain in the UK."