15 months full-time + 36 months working 20 hrs/week (equivalent to 18 months full-time) = 33 months (2 years and 9 months) of full-time work
Part of the reason I don't have more full-time work experience is that I have a BSc, an MA (from the UK) and I'm completing a second MA now (also in the UK). I applied as an under-28, so it's not unreasonable to think that a young person with lots of education would be lacking in full-time work experience. Has anyone else been accepted in a similar situation (for instance, using 4 years of half-time work to make up 2 years of full-time work)?
When I submitted the application back in September, my consultant said this was pretty standard and had been accepted in the past. Now she's gotten a rejection for a similar case and the reason given was "not enough work experience". So apparently they're applying this new standard retroactively and my consultant seems almost certain that my application will be denied.
Is this sort of thing even legal? The whole process of handling HSMPs from June-October of last year seems really, really dodgy.
1) They give an estimated processing time of 2-3 months. Then they put 5 months of applications off to the side and won't process them for some indeterminate length of time. The original 2-3 months turns into 8-12+ months. And while this is going on, they claim that they're processing applications as per their "Service Standard".
They neglect to mention the massive backlog of applications which they seem to have unofficially removed from the system temporarily. It's very easy to meet processing quotas when you just hide any application that you can't process in time.Service standard: 50% of applications to be decided within 5 weeks of receipt at our payment handling service and 90% in 14 weeks.
2) They have a set of guidelines by which they judge applications. Those of us who submitted last year were told they would be judged by one set of guidelines. Because of the HSMP team's remarkable incompetence, the applications are being judged now by a harsher standard. So essentially, applicants paid 300 quid to apply based on the old standards and now the Home Office says, "thanks for the money, but you don't meet the new standards we created after you submitted your application." Seems quite fraudulent to me..