ESC

Click the "allow" button if you want to receive important news and updates from immigrationboards.com


Immigrationboards.com: Immigration, work visa and work permit discussion board

Welcome to immigrationboards.com!

Login Register Do not show

Naturalisation Refused

General UK immigration & work permits; don't post job search or family related topics!

Please use this section of the board if there is no specific section for your query.

Moderators: Casa, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha, archigabe, Administrator

samir10
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:13 pm

Naturalisation Refused

Post by samir10 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:19 pm

I applied in July and got letter back now saying your application has been refused becuase of traffic conviction.

I have been fined £60+£60+3points for not displaying L plate and speeding and yes that was in court.

Is there anything i can do , or Judcial Review is the last option as i am not convinced they have acted lawfully.

Any expereince similar to this ?

Mr Rusty
Diamond Member
Posts: 1041
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:09 pm

Post by Mr Rusty » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:49 pm

Interesting.

Did you declare it on your application?
How long ago were the convictions?
Have you written to them to ask why two such allegedly minor offences are sufficient to justify a decision that you are not "of good character"? There is no right of appeal but their website says you are entitled to ask them to justify their decision and say why it is wrong.

tech
Member of Standing
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 1:01 am

Post by tech » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:56 pm

If it is given in your court, then it should be spent before you can apply for naturalisation. Did you declare them in the form ? Anything given in court must be declared unless that was spent.

You need give more details about when this has happened and full details of the incident to get some suggestions.

The only way to challenge this, the offenece has been already spent and that was not taken into consideration while making the decision.

samir10
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:13 pm

Post by samir10 » Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:02 pm

Mr Rusty wrote:Interesting.

Did you declare it on your application?
How long ago were the convictions?
Have you written to them to ask why two such allegedly minor offences are sufficient to justify a decision that you are not "of good character"? There is no right of appeal but their website says you are entitled to ask them to justify their decision and say why it is wrong.
Yes of course i have declared that. I wrote them with case worker guidllines and also sent them my Disclosure Scotland clearly shows no conviction ,no warning , no caution or anything whatsoever.

But this minor conviction which is even not recordable was basis of their decision

My basis was them to consider my case under "case worker guidlines for good character" where 3..3.2 which clearly tells case workers to ignore minor unspent convictions where applicant is good by all standards.

I am confidant that again excessive beaurocratic power ( i would say unlawful as well) been used by case worker and a Judicial review can settle this.

Has anyone been through judicial review or anyone can help me going forward.

newperson
Member
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 6:36 am

Post by newperson » Mon Sep 07, 2009 10:53 pm

samir10 wrote: I am confidant that again excessive beaurocratic power ( i would say unlawful as well) been used by case worker and a Judicial review can settle this.

Has anyone been through judicial review or anyone can help me going forward.
I fear that a JR would be a complete waste of time for you. Naturalisation decisions in the UK under Section 6(1) may perhaps be one of the most opaque processes in the country. These decisions are literally at the discretion of the Home Secretary. Even if you meet the legal requirements, if s/he doesn't like you for whatever reason, you don't get naturalised. Simple as that. It's at his/her whim. That's what "discretion" means.

Talk to a solicitor about a JR if you like, but just be realistic. If Harrod's owner Mohamed al-Fayed can't get naturalised with all his clout and connections, it sort of underlines what "discretion" is all about.

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England

Post by John » Tue Sep 08, 2009 6:26 am

samir10 wrote:Is there anything i can do
Yes, wait until the convictions are spent, and then reapply.

You have already been asked about the date of the convictions, but have not replied. So again, when was that?
John

samir10
Newly Registered
Posts: 4
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 7:13 pm

Post by samir10 » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:24 am

John wrote:
samir10 wrote:Is there anything i can do

You have already been asked about the date of the convictions, but have not replied. So again, when was that?
Oct 07. That may put me under new rules as well.

supercreature
Junior Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:50 am

Post by supercreature » Tue Sep 08, 2009 7:59 am

Guys,

How much time is required in between to consider such minor conviction as spent?

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England

Post by John » Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:27 am

How much time is required in between to consider such minor conviction as spent?
One looks at the sentence imposed. As a fine was imposed, we are talking about the convictions becoming spent 5 years .... after the date of conviction ... not the date the offenses were committed.
John

dr_raihan29
Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:36 am

Post by dr_raihan29 » Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:51 am

hi there guys a bit off topic and my apologies for that but may I ask you what happens if somebody has a police caution(given at a police station not at court) for fight with ones wife? As far as I know cautions never become spent and does this mean that person(me in this case) can never apply for naturalization?

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England

Post by John » Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:32 am

Cautions? That is not actually a conviction so from the naturalisation angle, there is nothing to worry about.

Obviously what I am just about to write does not apply to you, but the only exception regarding cautions relates to s e x offences, and there even a caution ends up on the S e x Offenders Register. Being on the register, even through just a caution, could well cause problems as regards a naturalisation application.
John

winber
Junior Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:36 pm

Post by winber » Tue Sep 08, 2009 5:43 pm

So have I understood this correctly, if I get a speeding ticket, I can't get naturalised for 5 years? Is it the same for a parking ticket?

Are the rules the same for ILR?

I feel scared to drive now!

tech
Member of Standing
Posts: 278
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 1:01 am

Post by tech » Tue Sep 08, 2009 9:51 pm

"You must give details of all unspent criminal convictions. This includes road traffic offences but not fixed penalty notices (such as speeding or parking tickets) unless they were given in court". You must include all drink-driving offences. An explanation of unspent convictions is given below.
http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/briti ... character/

Hope this helps

dr_raihan29
Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:36 am

Post by dr_raihan29 » Tue Sep 08, 2009 10:19 pm

interesting link tech:

so basically in this link it say why the OP was not given naturalization
"Drink-driving offences, driving while uninsured or disqualified are also not minor offences."

not displaying a L plate where needed is = driving uninsured thats why probably they didnt disregard the offence. Initially when i failed 4 times my practical test I was tempted to just continue driving on my international licence and not displaying L plate(beyond a year), thank God I didnt take the risk and finally passed the 5th time! :)

winber
Junior Member
Posts: 88
Joined: Sun Mar 01, 2009 11:36 pm

Post by winber » Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:02 pm

Interesting. So you don't have to declare fixed penalty notices.

Looking at this link, not displaying L plates is a fixed penalty notice:
http://www.psni.police.uk/index/advice- ... _codes.htm

That is for Northern Ireland, but I'd be surprised if it was different for England.

So I think the lesson here is, don't declare anything you don't have to. Otherwise the Home Office may become confused and think you have declared it because you have to, and because offences that have to be declared are bad, they might jump to a conclusion without proper consideration.

dr_raihan29
Member
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:36 am

Post by dr_raihan29 » Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:36 pm

you have got it wrong winber.........L plate might be itself fixed penalty.........but driving without L plate when u need to means you r driving unlicenced and that automatically invalidates ur insurance WHICH is a non-minor offence so indirectly the OP commited a major offence and got his application refused

Sten
Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:20 am

Re: Naturalisation Refused

Post by Sten » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:20 am

samir10 wrote:I have been fined £60+£60+3points for not displaying L plate and speeding and yes that was in court.
tech wrote:This includes road traffic offences but not fixed penalty notices (such as speeding or parking tickets) unless they were given in court".
Simples.

So the lesson here is - study UKBA guides before applying.

And another one - if you get fined, do not let it go to court, simply pay what they ask if you plan to apply for ILR/BC in future ..
Good luck !

hari15
Member of Standing
Posts: 362
Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 2:44 pm

Re: Naturalisation Refused

Post by hari15 » Wed Sep 09, 2009 9:36 am

Sten wrote:
samir10 wrote:I have been fined £60+£60+3points for not displaying L plate and speeding and yes that was in court.
tech wrote:This includes road traffic offences but not fixed penalty notices (such as speeding or parking tickets) unless they were given in court".
Simples.

So the lesson here is - study UKBA guides before applying.

And another one - if you get fined, do not let it go to court, simply pay what they ask if you plan to apply for ILR/BC in future ..
Good point sten.

Does this means that Going to court or not is the option to one who did this traffic offense? Or is it police to decide?

I still havent got license (failed 8 times practical test for some minor reasons each time). and not having car still going by local bus only

But I am highly tempted to buy a car before getting license and then to appear for test with my own car.

I need to apply for BC next year.

Just wanted to know if we pay the full penalty will it help in these kind of situiations?

Anyway I am now more scared to buy the car before getting license

Sten
Member
Posts: 237
Joined: Tue Jul 13, 2004 8:20 am

Re: Naturalisation Refused

Post by Sten » Wed Sep 09, 2009 10:05 am

hari15 wrote:Does this means that Going to court or not is the option to one who did this traffic offense? Or is it police to decide?
Obviously not. If it goes to court = you have to declare it even if it was a fixed penalty.

But you do not always have this choice. For example, if you get a speeding ticket while driving on a foreign licence, they can not put points there, so it goes to court automatically. Also if you exceed the speed limit by more than 20mph (if I remember this figure correctly) it also goes to court by default. I expect there are other scenarios that lead to court without an option to pay fine and close the case.

So my advice would be: if you drive here - get a UK licence and drive carefully, if you have commited a minor traffic offence - do not argue, try to settle it outside of court, just pay what they ask.
Good luck !

SOJOURNER
Newly Registered
Posts: 1
Joined: Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:27 pm

Post by SOJOURNER » Sun Sep 13, 2009 5:30 pm

i just got a car last week, because i thought it would give me something to work on... learning how to drive manual, and passing the test, but now im thinking that i will just sell the car once i pass my test because i dont want to take any chances of a traffic violation affecting my naturalisation. i thought that having a car would be good for holidays when there is no public transport, and also getting to know britain a little better, but now im thinking i better just take a taxi. i still cant get used to these round abouts. they are so confusing.

Sky_High
Member of Standing
Posts: 274
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:45 pm

Post by Sky_High » Sun Sep 13, 2009 6:31 pm

Oh Dear

U do not need to worry. If you do not live in London than you must have a car. Thats what I see. Just try to be careful. Do not drive without MOT and insurance. Do not drive above the speed limit. No drink driving etc . You will be fine.

melo75
Junior Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:31 am

Declare vs Give Details??

Post by melo75 » Mon Sep 28, 2009 9:34 pm

tech wrote:"You must give details of all unspent criminal convictions. This includes road traffic offences but not fixed penalty notices (such as speeding or parking tickets) unless they were given in court". You must include all drink-driving offences. An explanation of unspent convictions is given below.
http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/briti ... character/

Hope this helps
What is the difference between "declare" and "give details"? I had a speeding ticket fine that I challenged in court (but lost) in the USA 8 years ago. Do I have to tick the "YES" box when it asks if I ever had a convition?

alexsh1
Newbie
Posts: 42
Joined: Tue Apr 28, 2009 2:15 pm

Re: Declare vs Give Details??

Post by alexsh1 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 10:53 am

melo75 wrote:
tech wrote:"You must give details of all unspent criminal convictions. This includes road traffic offences but not fixed penalty notices (such as speeding or parking tickets) unless they were given in court". You must include all drink-driving offences. An explanation of unspent convictions is given below.
http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/briti ... character/

Hope this helps
What is the difference between "declare" and "give details"? I had a speeding ticket fine that I challenged in court (but lost) in the USA 8 years ago. Do I have to tick the "YES" box when it asks if I ever had a convition?
I am sure UKBA are not interested in your USA fine. They are interested in you appearing in the court in the UK

melo75
Junior Member
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:31 am

Re: Declare vs Give Details??

Post by melo75 » Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:37 pm

alexsh1 wrote:
melo75 wrote:
tech wrote:"You must give details of all unspent criminal convictions. This includes road traffic offences but not fixed penalty notices (such as speeding or parking tickets) unless they were given in court". You must include all drink-driving offences. An explanation of unspent convictions is given below.
http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/briti ... character/

Hope this helps
What is the difference between "declare" and "give details"? I had a speeding ticket fine that I challenged in court (but lost) in the USA 8 years ago. Do I have to tick the "YES" box when it asks if I ever had a convition?
I am sure UKBA are not interested in your USA fine. They are interested in you appearing in the court in the UK
Thanks Alexsh1. I also thought the same but the problem is the question (3.6 in naturalisation and 7.1 in ILR) clearly asks for "the UK and other countries", hence is my dilemma of what exactly I need to answer there.....YES or NO?

John
Moderator
Posts: 12320
Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 2:54 pm
Location: Birmingham, England

Post by John » Tue Sep 29, 2009 12:55 pm

I had a speeding ticket fine that I challenged in court (but lost) in the USA 8 years ago.
That being the case, under UK law, as far as the UK is concerned, that conviction is "spent" after 5 years .... a fine imposed = 5 year period.

As the application form AN says "Convictions spent under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 need not be disclosed", there is of course no need to mention that conviction.
John

Locked
cron