4L vs 4C Registration
Posted: Sat Jul 11, 2026 6:24 am
Hello everyone. I was registered as a British citizen under section 4C in 2022. My mother was born in the UK in 1957 and I was born in the United States in 1978. However, after reviewing the current nationality guidance, particularly Example 12 concerning section 5(1)(b) of the British Nationality Act 1948 and section 4L, I am trying to see why I was not registered under 4L, or if this means my children can register under 4L. Thank you!
“Registration as a British citizen in special circumstances,” Version 5.0, 7 May 2025
Example 12 – grandmother born in the UK – possible route to citizenship through section 5(1)(b) of the 1948 Act
Dwight was born in the USA in 1972. His maternal grandmother was born in the UK in 1925. Dwight’s father was born in the USA in 1950. Dwight’s father was not a citizen of the UK and Colonies by descent, because women could not pass on citizenship at that time. He has since registered as a British citizen under section 4C (in 2010). If women had been able to pass on citizenship at the time, Dwight’s father would have become a CUKC by descent and could have registered Dwight’s birth at a UK consulate within a year of the birth.
Under section 5 of the British Nationality Act 1948 there were certain scenarios where a person could have become a CUKC, despite their father being a CUKC by descent. The Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Romein took into account the fact that British mothers could not register their children’s birth at a British consulate, and we have recently legislated to allow a person who would have qualified under section 5(1)(b) to benefit under section 4C, despite the fact that no registration took place. If Dwight can establish that he would have had a claim under section 5(1)(b), having been born in a foreign (and not Commonwealth) country, had women been able to pass on citizenship in the same way as men, registration under section 4L might be appropriate.
“Registration as a British citizen in special circumstances,” Version 5.0, 7 May 2025
Example 12 – grandmother born in the UK – possible route to citizenship through section 5(1)(b) of the 1948 Act
Dwight was born in the USA in 1972. His maternal grandmother was born in the UK in 1925. Dwight’s father was born in the USA in 1950. Dwight’s father was not a citizen of the UK and Colonies by descent, because women could not pass on citizenship at that time. He has since registered as a British citizen under section 4C (in 2010). If women had been able to pass on citizenship at the time, Dwight’s father would have become a CUKC by descent and could have registered Dwight’s birth at a UK consulate within a year of the birth.
Under section 5 of the British Nationality Act 1948 there were certain scenarios where a person could have become a CUKC, despite their father being a CUKC by descent. The Supreme Court’s decision in the case of Romein took into account the fact that British mothers could not register their children’s birth at a British consulate, and we have recently legislated to allow a person who would have qualified under section 5(1)(b) to benefit under section 4C, despite the fact that no registration took place. If Dwight can establish that he would have had a claim under section 5(1)(b), having been born in a foreign (and not Commonwealth) country, had women been able to pass on citizenship in the same way as men, registration under section 4L might be appropriate.