Page 1 of 1
Long Residence guidance wording
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 2:27 pm
by Hope987
How about those who have applied before 8 July 2024 relying on the Guidance where it says 'As the 10-year period extend beyond 1 1 April, there is no 548-day limit' and the clear example on Page 33 of the Guidance? Their applications were put on hold and what would be the status now?
Re: Long Residence guidance wording
Posted: Wed Jul 10, 2024 3:52 pm
by zimba
Hope987 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 10, 2024 2:27 pm
How about those who have applied before 8 July 2024 relying on the Guidance where it says 'As the 10-year period extend beyond 1 1 April, there is no 548-day limit' and the clear example on Page 33 of the Guidance? Their applications were put on hold and what would be the status now?
Refrain from tagging the query over other topics. Updates posted on other topics are intended for the original poster, it is not an invitation to everyone to jump in and hijack the thread. The guide mostly poorly worded the issue, leading to major confusion and an incorrect example. It should have been worded differently like that for the period of
absences (not the 10 years) extending beyond 11 April 2024, the 548 rule does not apply.
Re: Long Residence guidance wording
Posted: Thu Jul 11, 2024 10:47 pm
by indramm2020
Received confirmation.. More than 950 days absence from 7/14 till 4/24..super priority service