In Limbo
Posted: Fri Nov 28, 2014 11:59 am
Hi All,
Your input is highly appreciated.
A friend of mine found himself in a tricky situation. His 5 years visa has expired while he was in the middle of a legal procedure (high court) vs the H.O. The judge had given both parties the right of appeal but the H.O did not do so after the 5 days deadline given by the judge. Now according to his solicitor he's automatically entitled to a residence card but it might take a while until it's issued as the H.O are extremely busy (some similar cases took up to a year to be sorted). His employer asked him to leave his previous job two months ago because of the expired visa and once contacted the H.O confirmed to the employer and later to his local MP that he's not allowed to work until his situation is dealt with.
The fact that he was allowed to pursue legal procedure (appeal,hearing,..) isn't it in itself an admission of legal stay hence the ability to work until the stay is no longer legal ? Why the H.O is refusing to let him work (He was always working) knowing all the dire consequences of being unemployed without any possibility of help ?
Is there any legal way to challenge the decision of the H.O to not allow him temporarily to work until his visa is issued ?
Thank you so much.
Your input is highly appreciated.
A friend of mine found himself in a tricky situation. His 5 years visa has expired while he was in the middle of a legal procedure (high court) vs the H.O. The judge had given both parties the right of appeal but the H.O did not do so after the 5 days deadline given by the judge. Now according to his solicitor he's automatically entitled to a residence card but it might take a while until it's issued as the H.O are extremely busy (some similar cases took up to a year to be sorted). His employer asked him to leave his previous job two months ago because of the expired visa and once contacted the H.O confirmed to the employer and later to his local MP that he's not allowed to work until his situation is dealt with.
The fact that he was allowed to pursue legal procedure (appeal,hearing,..) isn't it in itself an admission of legal stay hence the ability to work until the stay is no longer legal ? Why the H.O is refusing to let him work (He was always working) knowing all the dire consequences of being unemployed without any possibility of help ?
Is there any legal way to challenge the decision of the H.O to not allow him temporarily to work until his visa is issued ?
Thank you so much.