MelK83 wrote: ↑Wed Aug 17, 2022 9:57 pm
Ok, so, to be clear on the logic, if he were to re-apply for pre-settled (as a family member of an EEA citizen) status tomorrow and have it granted on 30 August 2022, he'd have a new pre-settled status granted letter saying it expires on 30 August 2027 but started on 3 May 2022 (original date)?
That is what the caseworker guidance says.
Is there not an advantage of doing this to be "safe" as what if on 4 May 2022, there is a massive internet outage or something? (I know this is being dramatic - I just don't want his pre-settled status to expire.)
Good question. You could say it, but... I am wondering if this technique works for everyone. There is probably a catch? I am wondering if they indeed do grant pre-settled status to everyone who applies and is eligible. In theory that is what they should do, but in practice... there are always hidden/blank sections in the guidance that are restricted in the published document and we cannot see. I am wondering if there is further information on wether they sometimes can simply... not do anything with repeat applications, not grant, not cancel; just treat the application as void? It says "If you grant pre settled status" not 'when you grant pre-Settled status", which suggests not all repeat applications result in repeat pre-settled status.
I would say, you lose nothing by just trying.
Another separate question: Would he have to do biometrics again for any further applications? (Settled status, naturalisation, etc.) He had to do them for the pre-settled status (and separately for his Tier 2).
I would think no. Biometrics is needed for when you need a physical card. The EU Settled status itself is digital; biometrics were needed in his case because he is non-EU and did not have a card under the EUSS. But now that he has a card, it should not get replaced, and thus he should not need to do biometrics again.
I didn't really want to wait an extra 4 years to apply for naturalisation so
True that 4 years is a long time to wait, but just so it's clear, apart from being able to vote on general elections (which, granted, might be a valid motivation) there aren't any substantial advantages of life in the UK between being a British citizen and just having Settled Status.
I'm trying to understand the trade-off here of how hard is Lounes? Is it just more work to fill out the paper and a longer wait time? But it's not more or less likely to be granted than settled status?
Unfortunately we don't have comprehensive timelines to tell how much longer a Lounes application takes compared to a regular one. We just know that you cannot apply online, but instead you need use a paper form that you have to request by phone, and it will be pre-filled for you with your details, so you can imagine how that in itself adds much more room for error and delay (I imagine you have seen
this post).
The issue with Lounes is not about likelihood it's about it just being unnecessarily cumbersome. Then again, if we are talking 4 years, then... that might justify it.