- FAQ
- Login
- Register
- Call Workpermit.com for a paid service +44 (0)344-991-9222
ESC
Welcome to immigrationboards.com!
Moderators: Casa, archigabe, CR001, push, JAJ, ca.funke, Amber, zimba, vinny, Obie, EUsmileWEallsmile, batleykhan, meself2, geriatrix, John, ChetanOjha
Fixed penalty notices, penalty charge notices and penalty
notices for disorder
Fixed penalty notices, penalty charge notices and penalty notices for disorder are
imposed by the police or other authorised enforcement officers for traffic rule
violations, environmental and civil violations. A fixed penalty notice may also be
issued where a person has committed an offence under the coronavirus Regulations.
It is a way of the criminal justice system disposing of minor offences without the need
for a person to attend court.
Receiving one does not form part of a person’s criminal record. A fixed penalty
notice will not normally result in refusal unless the person has failed to pay or has
unsuccessfully challenged the notice and there were subsequent criminal
proceedings resulting in a conviction. In such instances, they should be treated in
line with the sentence imposed by the court.
However, multiple fixed penalty notices over a short period of time, could
demonstrate a disregard for the law and therefore demonstrate that someone is not
of good character.
See considering the balance of probabilities for more information.
Considering the balance of probabilities
Where a person has criminality that would not normally result in the refusal of their
application, you must decide whether they are of good character, on the balance of
probabilities.
An assessment of whether or not a person is of good character on the balance of
probabilities, must take account of all available information concerning the
applicant’s character, weighing any negative factors around criminality against
mitigating factors such as contributions a person has made to society or any
significant proportions of a person’s life spent not offending.
You must consider the individual circumstances of the case; what may be
appropriate for one case will not be appropriate for another. Each application must
be carefully considered on an individual basis on its own merits, giving consideration
to the (non-exhaustive) list of factors below:
Length of time since offences
You must consider how long ago the offences took place. The more recent the
offence, the more likely it is the applicant is not of good character.
Older offences may still indicate the person is not of good character, if the
circumstances of the conviction or disposal call the person’s character into question.
It is also more likely that a person will not be meet the good character requirement on
the sole basis of non-custodial offences or out of court disposals where the offences
took place recently.
Number of offences
You must consider the number of offences on the applicant’s record. There is no set
number of non-custodial sentences or out of court disposals that would mean a
person is not of good character; however, the higher the number the more likely it is
the person is not of good character.
A person who persistently shows a lack of respect for, or desire to comply with, the
law of the UK, through frequent criminal activity and adverse engagement with the
judicial system, can be considered to show a particular disregard for the law.
Where a person is identified as a persistent offender who has shown a particular
disregard for the law, they will normally not be considered to be of good character on
that basis alone.
Period over which offences were committed
You must consider the period over which offences were committed or other
disposals occurred. For example, a series of minor offences or disposals in a short
space of time may indicate a pattern of sustained anti-social behaviour or disregard
for the law which will be relevant to the assessment of the person’s character.
Older non-custodial sentences or out of court disposals may be relevant if there are
other serious factors.
Where a person is identified as a persistent offender who has shown a particular
disregard for the law, they will normally not be considered to be of good character on
that basis alone.
...
Other mitigating factors
You must also consider whether the applicant has demonstrated genuine,
meaningful attempts to change their behaviour and comply with the law that may
indicate, on a balance of probabilities, they are now considered to be of good
character despite earlier offending. A long period of time with no offending will be a
more positive factor than a short period of time.
An applicant may have also been involved in activities that indicate they may be of
good character. For example, they may have,
• engaged with programmes or activities aimed at addressing the cause of the
offending, such as (but not limited to) treatments aimed at reduction of alcohol
consumption, or drug dependency or anger management courses
• actively engaged with voluntary work, charity work, or actively promoted the
reduction of crime
The list of factors is indicative, not exhaustive.
I'm not sure I understand rhings right. It's saying "multiple fixed penalty notices", but does it also include PCNs (Penalty Charge Notices) and Parking Charge Notices? If we are talking only about the FPNs, then I have just 3 of them.Casa wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2024 4:58 pmhttps://www.gov.uk/government/publicati ... sentencing
"However, multiple fixed penalty notices over a short period of time, could demonstrate a disregard for the law and therefore demonstrate that someone is not of good character."
contorted_svy wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2024 4:15 pmFor any FPNs you received, as well as late filing by HMRC, do your best to retrieve the details. The HMRC helpline may be a resource for you - call them and ask about these late filings, they may have them still on record.
Cancelled FPNs/PCNs are not relevant. Nor are awareness courses as you were not issued a FPN.
I am assuming you paid all of these, also those you received a notice of rejection for?
Why have you been summoned regarding Council Tax? Have you made a repayment plan?
Overall, you haven't committed serious offences, BUT there is a pattern there, which may indicate to the Home Office that you tend to disregard the rules.
From the Good character guidance https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... racter.pdf
Fixed penalty notices, penalty charge notices and penalty
notices for disorder
Fixed penalty notices, penalty charge notices and penalty notices for disorder are
imposed by the police or other authorised enforcement officers for traffic rule
violations, environmental and civil violations. A fixed penalty notice may also be
issued where a person has committed an offence under the coronavirus Regulations.
It is a way of the criminal justice system disposing of minor offences without the need
for a person to attend court.
Receiving one does not form part of a person’s criminal record. A fixed penalty
notice will not normally result in refusal unless the person has failed to pay or has
unsuccessfully challenged the notice and there were subsequent criminal
proceedings resulting in a conviction. In such instances, they should be treated in
line with the sentence imposed by the court.
However, multiple fixed penalty notices over a short period of time, could
demonstrate a disregard for the law and therefore demonstrate that someone is not
of good character.
See considering the balance of probabilities for more information.Considering the balance of probabilities
Where a person has criminality that would not normally result in the refusal of their
application, you must decide whether they are of good character, on the balance of
probabilities.
An assessment of whether or not a person is of good character on the balance of
probabilities, must take account of all available information concerning the
applicant’s character, weighing any negative factors around criminality against
mitigating factors such as contributions a person has made to society or any
significant proportions of a person’s life spent not offending.
You must consider the individual circumstances of the case; what may be
appropriate for one case will not be appropriate for another. Each application must
be carefully considered on an individual basis on its own merits, giving consideration
to the (non-exhaustive) list of factors below:
Length of time since offences
You must consider how long ago the offences took place. The more recent the
offence, the more likely it is the applicant is not of good character.
Older offences may still indicate the person is not of good character, if the
circumstances of the conviction or disposal call the person’s character into question.
It is also more likely that a person will not be meet the good character requirement on
the sole basis of non-custodial offences or out of court disposals where the offences
took place recently.
Number of offences
You must consider the number of offences on the applicant’s record. There is no set
number of non-custodial sentences or out of court disposals that would mean a
person is not of good character; however, the higher the number the more likely it is
the person is not of good character.
A person who persistently shows a lack of respect for, or desire to comply with, the
law of the UK, through frequent criminal activity and adverse engagement with the
judicial system, can be considered to show a particular disregard for the law.
Where a person is identified as a persistent offender who has shown a particular
disregard for the law, they will normally not be considered to be of good character on
that basis alone.
Period over which offences were committed
You must consider the period over which offences were committed or other
disposals occurred. For example, a series of minor offences or disposals in a short
space of time may indicate a pattern of sustained anti-social behaviour or disregard
for the law which will be relevant to the assessment of the person’s character.
Older non-custodial sentences or out of court disposals may be relevant if there are
other serious factors.
Where a person is identified as a persistent offender who has shown a particular
disregard for the law, they will normally not be considered to be of good character on
that basis alone.
...
Other mitigating factors
You must also consider whether the applicant has demonstrated genuine,
meaningful attempts to change their behaviour and comply with the law that may
indicate, on a balance of probabilities, they are now considered to be of good
character despite earlier offending. A long period of time with no offending will be a
more positive factor than a short period of time.
An applicant may have also been involved in activities that indicate they may be of
good character. For example, they may have,
• engaged with programmes or activities aimed at addressing the cause of the
offending, such as (but not limited to) treatments aimed at reduction of alcohol
consumption, or drug dependency or anger management courses
• actively engaged with voluntary work, charity work, or actively promoted the
reduction of crime
The list of factors is indicative, not exhaustive.
I suggest that you should review your list in chronological order, removing the ones I mentioned above which are not relevant. You do have (if I counted correctly) at least 3 FPNs in 5 years. You never committed any serious offence, but from the amount of small infractions you committed you may give the impression of having a general disregard of the rules - note it is hard to know what the HO may consider a pattern, or if there is a maximum number of FPNs over a certain period of time that leads to refusal.
What I would recommend, after reassessing the number/frequency of offences, is to do your very best to spend at least a year without getting any PCNs/FPNs and to do something that shows your character has changed (eg volunteering in the community, taking a safe driving course)
If the vehicle is in your name, one could infer that you committed most of those violations. If they were all paid, theoretically they shouldn't be a problem HOWEVER the fact you received so many may raise a problem. I do not know how they would find out but surely they have ways to conduct background checks.Tony_LV wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2024 6:42 pm
No. 1, 2, and 3 are all PCNs. Some are for ULEZ and Congestion Charge, some for Parking, some for something else. But they are all still PCNs, not FPNs. Do I need to declare them at all? Do they see them at all in their system? I guess they should not, as PCNs are addressed to a vehicle owner and potentially driver could be someone else (my wife, for example). Now I can't even remember which PCNs were received by me and which of them by my wife.
I wouldn't say it causes an issue as you paid what you were requested. As it is a PCN normally these are not declared, but as I highlighted above you have a pattern of receiving a consistent amount of them - unsure how this is interpreted by caseworkers.Tony_LV wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2024 6:42 pmAlso, what about this one? Do I need to declare this PCN:
20/02/2023 - PCN by Wandsworth - Entering and stopping in a box junction when prohibited - I made a representation, but I think it was unsuccessful, or possibly they didn't receive it. As a result, an order to recover a Penalty Charge Notice has been made against me at the Traffic Enforcement Centre at the County Court Business Centre. I paid in full, £165, plus a £9 court registration fee, £174 total. I guess I do need to declare this, don't I? Can an unsuccessful representation of a PCN be a reason for refusal?
Was this a trial? Was it an out of court disposal?
It seems like a Penalty Charge Notice so it would be akin to a parking offence. Again normally these are not a matter to have to declare but you have a certain number to your name.Tony_LV wrote: ↑Thu Jul 11, 2024 6:42 pmDo I need to declare this one:
05/02/2024 - Penalty Notice by London Borough of Sutton - Penalty Notice for my son's 5-day absence from school because of an unauthorized holiday trip - Paid in full, £120. Do I need to declare it and where does it go in the form?