Disclosure : I has started a topic several months ago, but wasn't in a position to reply to any messages so it was locked. Hence why I'm doing it again.
A quick recap of the background is:
- My husband was born in the UK in the 1950s. As such, he is entitled by right to claim British citizenship, but he hasn't ever done so, and likely never will.
- But just last year, he claimed Right of Abode and this was granted very quickly. On that basis, I claimed it as well, and it was granted to me too by virtue of having been married to him.
Now I am wondering if this is something my daughter can use? The guidance does state that "A CUKC born to or adopted by a parent who, at the time of the person’s birth or adoption, had right of abode under s.2(1)(a) of the 1971". So a basic understanding of that implies that she does qualify.
But the legalese isn't clear / explicit enough that I feel comfortable enough to encourage her to use this as a basis to apply for RoA. If it's denied, then I don't want that to impact her future regular visitor visa applications.
If anyone has any input on whether or not this is something that is feasible, it will be much appreciated.
To summarise :
- Father born in UK, never claimed British Citizenship, always had an Indian passport, but was granted RoA in 2024
- Mother born in Kenya, always had a Kenyan passport, married in the 70s, was granted RoA in 2024 on the basis of being married to someone with RoA
- Adult child, born in India in 1981, always had an Indian passport
Can the adult daughter (born before 1983) of a man born in the UK (in the 1950s) who just claimed (and got) RoA recently claim RoA for herself? Neither parents have a British Passport, but it would appear the father is entitled by right to British Citizenship on account of his birth in Britain in the 1950s.
It seems my daughter would be eligible. But like I said I don't want to encourage her and if there's a denial have it count against her in future.